Poll: Who to beat
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Shelby Valley
35.56%
Hazard
23.70%
Knott Central
19.26%
Letcher Central
7.41%
Other
14.07%
* You voted for this item.

  •  Previous
  • 1
  • 2(current)
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 7
  • Next 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Who will be the better Mountain team for 2009?
#31
Hazard
SV
Knott
#32
Aristotle Wrote:Hazard
SV
Knott
Sounds good
#33
I can't believe Elliot isn't considered a "mountain" team. Are you afraid of them?
#34
Elliott should be considered a mountain team. I personally think they are better than SV but thats just me. They only lose 2 people and one didn't really play a lot. The other guy was just a shooter but I am sure Elliott isn't going to miss a shooter considering everyone on the team can shoot. But if they are not a mountain team then id say SV and Hazard are the best.
#35
TheRealVille Wrote:I can't believe Elliot isn't considered a "mountain" team. Are you afraid of them?
What do I have to be afraid of them, Im not in High School.
I just dont consider there hills as big as Letcher,Knott, or Floyd Counties.
I guess to Lexington or Louisville people they are mountains but not me.
#36
Aristotle Wrote:Hazard
SV
Knott

LOL, Knotts not even top 5.
#37
liveordie20 Wrote:LOL, Knotts not even top 5.
I know there not right now, but next season they will be.
#38
RavenBoy Wrote:I know there not right now, but next season they will be.

I still dont belive so.

Hazard
Shelby Valley.
South L.
PCC
LCC
Clay
All of these teams will still be better. And to be honest maybe estill but idk how many seniors they had.
#39
RavenBoy Wrote:What do I have to be afraid of them, Im not in High School.
I just dont consider there hills as big as Letcher,Knott, or Floyd Counties.
I guess to Lexington or Louisville people they are mountains but not me.
If you consider Johnson Co. teams to be mountain teams you have to include Elliot. It is the same hills as Johnson. Both counties are considered to be in the "mountains", as well as Lawrence.
#40
I agree with all, SV, Haz, KCC, if the collins kid from JBS goes to any of these 3 then I think you have to put that school ahead of the other 2.
#41
Shelby Valley did not get past final 4 in Class A or Regional. Hazard proved their deserving.........
#42
BlueSky Wrote:Shelby Valley did not get past final 4 in Class A or Regional. Hazard proved their deserving.........

LOL, Valley was beaten by a team that made the 2nd day of State Tournament. Valley and Paintsville should have been the final game, not final 4 game.
#43
liveordie20 Wrote:I still dont belive so.

Hazard
Shelby Valley.
South L.
PCC
LCC
Clay
All of these teams will still be better. And to be honest maybe estill but idk how many seniors they had.
Pcc wasent good this year and they will be the same next year.
#44
I do believe Hazard also made it past the first round and closer to final round. Also they won their regionals.
#45
PC_You_Know Wrote:LOL, Valley was beaten by a team that made the 2nd day of State Tournament. Valley and Paintsville should have been the final game, not final 4 game.
So you think the drawing should have been rigged so that they played in the final game of the All A instead of having a drawing for it?
It's not the size of the dog in the fight. It is the size of the fight in the dog.
#46
I think it will come down to Hazard and SV. I wish they would play each other in the WYMT.
#47
BasketBallonlyfan Wrote:So you think the drawing should have been rigged so that they played in the final game of the All A instead of having a drawing for it?

I belive he was refering to the final four of the region, not the all-a, just saying
#48
liveordie20 Wrote:I belive he was refering to the final four of the region, not the all-a, just saying
Same thing for the regions. It is names drawn out of a hat. I will agree the dream match up would have been them meeting in the finals. It didnt work that way.
It's not the size of the dog in the fight. It is the size of the fight in the dog.
#49
BasketBallonlyfan Wrote:Same thing for the regions. It is names drawn out of a hat. I will agree the dream match up would have been them meeting in the finals. It didnt work that way.

Yes that's all I was saying. I think the region would have been a lot better if the two met in the championship like it should have been decided. Like the NCAA, the top teams are on opposite sides, why can't the regions get this right?
#50
Hazard all the way
#51
RavenBoy Wrote:Pcc wasent good this year and they will be the same next year.

they werent? im pretty sure they were in the region finals, while nott didnt even make it out of district. PCC only lost one player two, so maybe if u knew anything you would know, yes, they are good.
#52
liveordie20 Wrote:they werent? im pretty sure they were in the region finals, while nott didnt even make it out of district. PCC only lost one player two, so maybe if u knew anything you would know, yes, they are good.
They had the easiest draw, Riverside could of made it out there. Listen PAL, they lost their coach and will never be the same. Thats the bottom line.
#53
RavenBoy Wrote:They had the easiest draw, Riverside could of made it out there. Listen PAL, they lost their coach and will never be the same. Thats the bottom line.

Really? they beat every one in the region last year pretty much except for Hazard, so i dotn see how they are so bad, they had a youngg team with one senior and no, they havent lost there coach. And idk about u calling me pal cause im nto much for hanging out with a idiot.
#54
EKY Sportster Wrote:Only one county stands between Elliott and WV, so how can they not be a mountain team? Get real!!

for the record elliot co. touches johnson county. how could they not be a mountain team?
#55
liveordie20 Wrote:And idk about u calling me pal cause im nto much for hanging out with a idiot.
I wonder why people on Forums get bad names. Real Mature.Smile Well looks like you just got yourself a infraction. :thatsfunn
#56
Its goin to be a good wymt mountain classic next year but im goin to have to go with the boys in knott...KCC
Go Pats
#57
anklebreaker Wrote:Its goin to be a good wymt mountain classic next year but im goin to have to go with the boys in knott...KCC
Go Pats

I doubt that Knott will even be in the WYMT. They are usually not in it when it's at PCC because they are so weak. So, I doubt your boys will even be playing. Hazard should win everything they play in next year with ease.
#58
Survivor Wrote:I doubt that Knott will even be in the WYMT. They are usually not in it when it's at PCC because they are so weak. So, I doubt your boys will even be playing. Hazard should win everything they play in next year with ease.

your a joke...i don't see why people like you are allowed to post on here. Quit insulting other schools, especially when you are dead wrong and obviously have no sense of what it takes to make a good team. Knott will be awesome next year, as well as Hazard. The only way we will see who is better is when they play their first game, maybe later.
#59
PATS2011 Wrote:your a joke...i don't see why people like you are allowed to post on here. Quit insulting other schools, especially when you are dead wrong and obviously have no sense of what it takes to make a good team. Knott will be awesome next year, as well as Hazard. The only way we will see who is better is when they play their first game, maybe later.


It's you're not your. They let people like me post on here because I know what I'm talking about. Knott will not come close to Hazard next year. Nobody will. Hazard lost only 2 games in the state of KY this year before the state tournament. What makes you thank that adding Cox to a team that was mediocre at best can contend with the mighty Dawgs? I also heard today that Hazard is adding another great player to an already great team. Miller from Knox Central will be attending Hazard next year. I think you just may see a state championship title for the bulldogs.:rockon:
#60
Let me remind everyone of rule #1...

Rule #1 Wrote:1.Use common sense and be considerate and respectful toward all users. Diversity of opinion is encouraged here at BGR, however insulting or flaming another member because he or she doesn’t agree with you will not be tolerated. (This applies to everyone on the board, including staff members) Disagreeing with an idea or opinion of one is perfectly acceptable and is not the same as attacking that individual. An example of this would be calling someone a disrespectful name because you don’t agree with them. - Violating this rule will result in an immediate ban of user account and you could possibly be prosecuted.
  •  Previous
  • 1
  • 2(current)
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 7
  • Next 

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)