[Beef]

Hmmm...let me throw some stuff out there about these last couple of posts...

1.) Why go to Iraq/Afgan and not N. Korea? -- Seems to me as if 9/11 was a result of terrorists and not N.K. Seems like the place to go.

2.) "trying to find WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION" -- If I'm not mistaken we have found hundreds of WMDs. -- http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html

3.) Bush not doing anything about it -- There's an idea, lets attack a country with Nukes (See next post) .... not to mention, we can't just attack a country like this without support from the rest of the UN countries. Not to mention all of the protests that would come from this country and the thousands that support it now and back out in a couple of months (ie. Afgan/Iraq)

4.) Why N.K. has nukes -- Clinton agreed in the mid 90's to give N.K $5 BILLION and TWO(2) nuclear reactors to cease nuclear enrichment -- good call there to GIVE them the nuclear producers.

5.) "Daddy didn't make a mistake" -- Daddy didn't cause 9/11 eaither. Things happen and I'm sure that eaither party would have done the same thing if they were in the White House. Let us not forget that John Kerry was a supporter of the War along with a good majority of Congress. Dems or Republicans would have gone, face it.

6.) BEST QUOTE!

Either way we go, the Pres. is damned if he does, ...damned if he don't.

[CatDawg]

North Korea would have been a lot harder with the location, plus Kim II Sung is a psycho, he might have just started launching nukes. They probly couldn't have reached the US because of all the satelites and whatever, but it might have started WWIII

When we started jacking around with them again they didn't have the nukes. Now we've waited to long.

[CatDawg]

Hmmm...let me throw some stuff out there about these last couple of posts...

1.) Why go to Iraq/Afgan and not N. Korea? -- Seems to me as if 9/11 was a result of terrorists and not N.K. Seems like the place to go.

2.) "trying to find WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION" -- If I'm not mistaken we have found hundreds of WMDs. -- http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html

3.) Bush not doing anything about it -- There's an idea, lets attack a country with Nukes (See next post) .... not to mention, we can't just attack a country like this without support from the rest of the UN countries. Not to mention all of the protests that would come from this country and the thousands that support it now and back out in a couple of months (ie. Afgan/Iraq)

4.) Why N.K. has nukes -- Clinton agreed in the mid 90's to give N.K $5 BILLION and TWO(2) nuclear reactors to cease nuclear enrichment -- good call there to GIVE them the nuclear producers.

5.) "Daddy didn't make a mistake" -- Daddy didn't cause 9/11 eaither. Things happen and I'm sure that eaither party would have done the same thing if they were in the White House. Let us not forget that John Kerry was a supporter of the War along with a good majority of Congress. Dems or Republicans would have gone, face it.

6.) BEST QUOTE!

1. North Korea was named with Iraq and Iran from the first minute after 9/11 remember the big State of the Union address from 2002.

2. Correct we've found some in Iraq and as I stated I think we should have gone back into Iraq heck we shouldn't have stopped short of going all the way the first time. As for finding big WMD we've known for years that North Korea was getting them but we didn't do anything about it. The big reason for going back into Iraq was due to the threat they were to the USA we'll North Korea is surely as much of a threat since with Iraq they couldn't even fly in almost half of their own country due to the no fly zones and with us watching every other move they made. I would say North Korea is more of a threat now than Iraq was then.

3. We can attack without the support of the UN look at the Iraq war.

4. I agree with this one pretty much Clinton and Bush should have done something about this long ago. But guess what we're now prepared to offer almost the same deal to Iran. This is also why most experts think North Korea has been trying to get attention since we've been giving all the attention to Iran and deals instead of even talking to them.

5. Like I said before I support going back in and would hope that either party would have. But I do think that 9/11 just happened to help justify the reason for doing so. And yes DADDY did screw up George W. Bush has even said that his father shouldn't have stopped during an interview while he was still leading Texas.

6. :thumpsup:

[Beef]

3. We can attack without the support of the UN look at the Iraq war.

Not without troops....many of which are in Iraq.

[CatDawg]

Not without troops....many of which are in Iraq.

That is true.

[Old School]

I heard on one report that there were more missiles to be tested in the near future.