Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
RIP Republican Party Hello Patriot Party
#31
(02-15-2021, 12:12 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 12:04 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 11:59 AM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 11:46 AM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 11:20 AM)Cardfan1 Wrote: copy and paste nonsense.  You're as bad as TRT and his Bible verses these days, Hooter.


This website is great.  I put it in the other thread but you can sort by state and type of crime. 
https://www.npr.org/2021/02/09/965472049...ir-stories

But I'd rather hear your stories. 

Come on, Man. I want that primary source.  If I should believe you and Jetty over my own eyes, tell me why.
Where is the name and charge of one Trump supporter who injured or killed anybody at the Capitol? I am still waiting.
Right there in the article.  Your eyes won't burn.  Read it, Hooter. 

All I can believe are the videos and that list provided by NPR using the court filings.  But as I said if you have something more definitive please share. I am giddy to here your story.  

 They are Trump stooges ain't no denying that.
One name, one injury, one charge. Is this yet another case of you posting a link to an article that you did not read? The article contains at least one allegation that has been withdrawn. It also contains names of people who are not Trump supporters. Come on, Comrade Cardfan, quit posting stuff that you have not even read. One name, one injury, one charge.
What are you talking about?  I thought you were a tech wiz? 

There are 28.

Scroll to the bottom and choose "violence and assault" and you will get results showing those who have been arrested at this time.  Read there charges.  
All are Trump stooges.
So, you are too lazy to read the article for yourself and provide a single Trump supporter who is responsible for injuring somebody. I thought so!  Big Grin
#32
I can't do everything for you Patriot Party folks. Big Grin

We have hijacked this thread with squabbling, Hooter.

Let's get back on topic with this new Rainbow Socialist Patriot Party. I'm interested. Will you be joining?
#33
(02-15-2021, 12:44 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote: I can't do everything for you Patriot Party folks.  Big Grin

We have hijacked this thread with squabbling, Hooter. 

Let's get back on topic with this new Rainbow Socialist Patriot Party.  I'm interested. Will you be joining?
I've already answered. Trump has no interest in the Patriot Party. This is just more wishful thinking from a Democrat Party led by a Chinese Communist Party puppet.
#34
(02-15-2021, 12:48 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 12:44 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote: I can't do everything for you Patriot Party folks.  Big Grin

We have hijacked this thread with squabbling, Hooter. 

Let's get back on topic with this new Rainbow Socialist Patriot Party.  I'm interested. Will you be joining?
I've already answered. Trump has no interest in the Patriot Party. This is just more wishful thinking from a Democrat Party led by a Chinese Communist Party puppet.

So Trump is just going to expel 30-50% of the Republican party?  It's obvious there is a major contingency of moderate Republicans that has no interest in the Trump wing of the party.  One group is going to leave.  

Democrats love refugees.  We won't even have to fake their citizenship for these votes. Big Grin
#35
(02-15-2021, 01:01 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 12:48 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 12:44 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote: I can't do everything for you Patriot Party folks.  Big Grin

We have hijacked this thread with squabbling, Hooter. 

Let's get back on topic with this new Rainbow Socialist Patriot Party.  I'm interested. Will you be joining?
I've already answered. Trump has no interest in the Patriot Party. This is just more wishful thinking from a Democrat Party led by a Chinese Communist Party puppet.

So Trump is just going to expel 30-50% of the Republican party?  It's obvious there is a major contingency of moderate Republicans that has no interest in the Trump wing of the party.  One group is going to leave.  

Democrats love refugees.  We won't even have to fake their citizenship for these votes. Big Grin
If Republicans can use their majorities in state legislatures to ensure secure, fair elections going forward, they have nothing to worry about. Democrats have shown that they cannot win without cheating. Your math skills suck. Trump had the support of far more than 70 percent of the Republican Party. 

High gas prices, high unemployment rates, and high tax rates have never been popular among Americans and that is what China wants for this country. What China wants, Biden will deliver.
#36
(02-15-2021, 01:15 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 01:01 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 12:48 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 12:44 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote: I can't do everything for you Patriot Party folks.  Big Grin

We have hijacked this thread with squabbling, Hooter. 

Let's get back on topic with this new Rainbow Socialist Patriot Party.  I'm interested. Will you be joining?
I've already answered. Trump has no interest in the Patriot Party. This is just more wishful thinking from a Democrat Party led by a Chinese Communist Party puppet.

So Trump is just going to expel 30-50% of the Republican party?  It's obvious there is a major contingency of moderate Republicans that has no interest in the Trump wing of the party.  One group is going to leave.  

Democrats love refugees.  We won't even have to fake their citizenship for these votes. Big Grin
If Republicans can use their majorities in state legislatures to ensure secure, fair elections going forward, they have nothing to worry about. Democrats have shown that they cannot win without cheating. Your math skills suck. Trump had the support of far more than 70 percent of the Republican Party. 

High gas prices, high unemployment rates, and high tax rates have never been popular among Americans and that is what China wants for this country. What China wants, Biden will deliver.
That was on Election Day. It’s been a century since then. 

Republicans have a deep fissure. They can’t win national popular votes anyway, so what makes you think they can with a chunk of the party that is ready to dump Trump?

 At the very least 15% is tired of Diaper Don.  But I believe that number is higher possibly much higher. Most Republicans don’t support attempted coups of our govt.
#37
(02-15-2021, 01:15 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 01:01 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 12:48 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 12:44 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote: I can't do everything for you Patriot Party folks.  Big Grin

We have hijacked this thread with squabbling, Hooter. 

Let's get back on topic with this new Rainbow Socialist Patriot Party.  I'm interested. Will you be joining?
I've already answered. Trump has no interest in the Patriot Party. This is just more wishful thinking from a Democrat Party led by a Chinese Communist Party puppet.

So Trump is just going to expel 30-50% of the Republican party?  It's obvious there is a major contingency of moderate Republicans that has no interest in the Trump wing of the party.  One group is going to leave.  

Democrats love refugees.  We won't even have to fake their citizenship for these votes. Big Grin
If Republicans can use their majorities in state legislatures to ensure secure, fair elections going forward, they have nothing to worry about. Democrats have shown that they cannot win without cheating. Your math skills suck. Trump had the support of far more than 70 percent of the Republican Party. 

High gas prices, high unemployment rates, and high tax rates have never been popular among Americans and that is what China wants for this country. What China wants, Biden will deliver.
Only chance you got Quooter keeping legal voters from voting that's the Q Party's plan keep the legal votes down
#38
(02-15-2021, 02:25 PM)vector#1 Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 01:15 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 01:01 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 12:48 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 12:44 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote: I can't do everything for you Patriot Party folks.  Big Grin

We have hijacked this thread with squabbling, Hooter. 

Let's get back on topic with this new Rainbow Socialist Patriot Party.  I'm interested. Will you be joining?
I've already answered. Trump has no interest in the Patriot Party. This is just more wishful thinking from a Democrat Party led by a Chinese Communist Party puppet.

So Trump is just going to expel 30-50% of the Republican party?  It's obvious there is a major contingency of moderate Republicans that has no interest in the Trump wing of the party.  One group is going to leave.  

Democrats love refugees.  We won't even have to fake their citizenship for these votes. Big Grin
If Republicans can use their majorities in state legislatures to ensure secure, fair elections going forward, they have nothing to worry about. Democrats have shown that they cannot win without cheating. Your math skills suck. Trump had the support of far more than 70 percent of the Republican Party. 

High gas prices, high unemployment rates, and high tax rates have never been popular among Americans and that is what China wants for this country. What China wants, Biden will deliver.
Only chance you got Quooter keeping legal voters from voting that's the Q Party's plan keep the legal votes down
Nope, Republicans will do fine if they eliminate the dead and imaginary Democrat voters. Even the dead will regret voting for Biden eventually.
[-] The following 1 user Likes Hoot Gibson's post:
  • TheRealThing
#39
(02-15-2021, 02:40 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 02:25 PM)vector#1 Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 01:15 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 01:01 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 12:48 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote: I've already answered. Trump has no interest in the Patriot Party. This is just more wishful thinking from a Democrat Party led by a Chinese Communist Party puppet.

So Trump is just going to expel 30-50% of the Republican party?  It's obvious there is a major contingency of moderate Republicans that has no interest in the Trump wing of the party.  One group is going to leave.  

Democrats love refugees.  We won't even have to fake their citizenship for these votes. Big Grin
If Republicans can use their majorities in state legislatures to ensure secure, fair elections going forward, they have nothing to worry about. Democrats have shown that they cannot win without cheating. Your math skills suck. Trump had the support of far more than 70 percent of the Republican Party. 

High gas prices, high unemployment rates, and high tax rates have never been popular among Americans and that is what China wants for this country. What China wants, Biden will deliver.
Only chance you got Quooter keeping legal voters from voting that's the Q Party's plan keep the legal votes down
Nope, Republicans will do fine if they eliminate the dead and imaginary Democrat voters. Even the dead will regret voting for Biden eventually.


Isn't that the truth!  I figured out Cardfan and vector's strategy. What ever the truth is,  vow and declare the exact opposite.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#40
(02-15-2021, 01:01 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 12:48 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 12:44 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote: I can't do everything for you Patriot Party folks.  Big Grin

We have hijacked this thread with squabbling, Hooter. 

Let's get back on topic with this new Rainbow Socialist Patriot Party.  I'm interested. Will you be joining?
I've already answered. Trump has no interest in the Patriot Party. This is just more wishful thinking from a Democrat Party led by a Chinese Communist Party puppet.

So Trump is just going to expel 30-50% of the Republican party?  It's obvious there is a major contingency of moderate Republicans that has no interest in the Trump wing of the party.  One group is going to leave.  

Democrats love refugees.  We won't even have to fake their citizenship for these votes. Big Grin


Well, it's about time. Everything else about the Dems is, is. Odds dictated they'd have to tell the truth about something, no matter how adverse to it they may be.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#41
https://news.gallup.com/poll/329639/supp...point.aspx

“ Independents are usually much more likely than Republicans or Democrats to favor a third political party, but in the current poll, Republicans are nearly as likely as independents to hold this view, 63% to 70%. That represents a dramatic shift for Republicans since last September when 40% favored a third party.
Republicans' current level of support for a third party is also the highest Gallup has measured for Republicans or Democrats in Gallup's trend.”

“ Currently, 68% of Republicans prefer that Trump remain the party leader, while 31% want the party to have a new leader. Republican-leaning independents, however, are divided, with 47% wanting Trump to continue leading and 51% preferring a new voice.”

These polls seem to back up my lies. Big Grin
#42
(02-15-2021, 09:23 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote: https://news.gallup.com/poll/329639/supp...point.aspx

“ Independents are usually much more likely than Republicans or Democrats to favor a third political party, but in the current poll, Republicans are nearly as likely as independents to hold this view, 63% to 70%. That represents a dramatic shift for Republicans since last September when 40% favored a third party.
      Republicans' current level of support for a third party is also the highest Gallup has measured for Republicans or Democrats in Gallup's trend.”

“ Currently, 68% of Republicans prefer that Trump remain the party leader, while 31% want the party to have a new leader. Republican-leaning independents, however, are divided, with 47% wanting Trump to continue leading and 51% preferring a new voice.”

These polls seem to back up my lies. Big Grin
Nobody backs up the whoppers you tell, Comrade Cardfan. Support for a third party is higher than normal among Republicans at the moment because of the betrayal of Trump by the establishment GOP. However, the Lincoln Project is disintegrating and Trump will help to topple many RINOs in the 2022 midterms, so support for a third party will not last. Republicans will be reminded of the failures of all previous modern third parties and no Republican will want to see Biden or Harris in the White House for two terms.
#43
(02-15-2021, 10:02 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 09:23 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote: https://news.gallup.com/poll/329639/supp...point.aspx

“ Independents are usually much more likely than Republicans or Democrats to favor a third political party, but in the current poll, Republicans are nearly as likely as independents to hold this view, 63% to 70%. That represents a dramatic shift for Republicans since last September when 40% favored a third party.
      Republicans' current level of support for a third party is also the highest Gallup has measured for Republicans or Democrats in Gallup's trend.”

“ Currently, 68% of Republicans prefer that Trump remain the party leader, while 31% want the party to have a new leader. Republican-leaning independents, however, are divided, with 47% wanting Trump to continue leading and 51% preferring a new voice.”

These polls seem to back up my lies. Big Grin
Nobody backs up the whoppers you tell, Comrade Cardfan. Support for a third party is higher than normal among Republicans at the moment because of the betrayal of Trump by the establishment GOP. However, the Lincoln Project is disintegrating and Trump will help to topple many RINOs in the 2022 midterms, so support for a third party will not last. Republicans will be reminded of the failures of all previous modern third parties and no Republican will want to see Biden or Harris in the White House for two terms.

you said that last time.  Cool Cool
#44
(02-15-2021, 10:07 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 10:02 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 09:23 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote: https://news.gallup.com/poll/329639/supp...point.aspx

“ Independents are usually much more likely than Republicans or Democrats to favor a third political party, but in the current poll, Republicans are nearly as likely as independents to hold this view, 63% to 70%. That represents a dramatic shift for Republicans since last September when 40% favored a third party.
      Republicans' current level of support for a third party is also the highest Gallup has measured for Republicans or Democrats in Gallup's trend.”

“ Currently, 68% of Republicans prefer that Trump remain the party leader, while 31% want the party to have a new leader. Republican-leaning independents, however, are divided, with 47% wanting Trump to continue leading and 51% preferring a new voice.”

These polls seem to back up my lies. Big Grin
Nobody backs up the whoppers you tell, Comrade Cardfan. Support for a third party is higher than normal among Republicans at the moment because of the betrayal of Trump by the establishment GOP. However, the Lincoln Project is disintegrating and Trump will help to topple many RINOs in the 2022 midterms, so support for a third party will not last. Republicans will be reminded of the failures of all previous modern third parties and no Republican will want to see Biden or Harris in the White House for two terms.

you said that last time.  Cool Cool
Yes, I did, and I was right. Democrats had to rig the election and extend the time to count votes so that they could truck in additional ballots. You are wrong again. A third party may be formed but it will not be a factor in 2024 and it is unlikely Trump would support a third party movement. He is the leader of the GOP already, so it would not make much sense for him to endorse a third party.
#45
(02-15-2021, 10:13 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 10:07 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 10:02 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 09:23 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote: https://news.gallup.com/poll/329639/supp...point.aspx

“ Independents are usually much more likely than Republicans or Democrats to favor a third political party, but in the current poll, Republicans are nearly as likely as independents to hold this view, 63% to 70%. That represents a dramatic shift for Republicans since last September when 40% favored a third party.
      Republicans' current level of support for a third party is also the highest Gallup has measured for Republicans or Democrats in Gallup's trend.”

“ Currently, 68% of Republicans prefer that Trump remain the party leader, while 31% want the party to have a new leader. Republican-leaning independents, however, are divided, with 47% wanting Trump to continue leading and 51% preferring a new voice.”

These polls seem to back up my lies. Big Grin
Nobody backs up the whoppers you tell, Comrade Cardfan. Support for a third party is higher than normal among Republicans at the moment because of the betrayal of Trump by the establishment GOP. However, the Lincoln Project is disintegrating and Trump will help to topple many RINOs in the 2022 midterms, so support for a third party will not last. Republicans will be reminded of the failures of all previous modern third parties and no Republican will want to see Biden or Harris in the White House for two terms.

you said that last time.  Cool Cool
Yes, I did, and I was right. Democrats had to rig the election and extend the time to count votes so that they could truck in additional ballots. You are wrong again. A third party may be formed but it will not be a factor in 2024 and it is unlikely Trump would support a third party movement. He is the leader of the GOP already, so it would not make much sense for him to endorse a third party.
Where did Democrats extend the time to count votes? 

How can The Trump wing win losing 20% (that’s being generous) of the vote to another party?
#46
(02-15-2021, 10:36 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 10:13 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 10:07 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 10:02 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 09:23 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote: https://news.gallup.com/poll/329639/supp...point.aspx

“ Independents are usually much more likely than Republicans or Democrats to favor a third political party, but in the current poll, Republicans are nearly as likely as independents to hold this view, 63% to 70%. That represents a dramatic shift for Republicans since last September when 40% favored a third party.
      Republicans' current level of support for a third party is also the highest Gallup has measured for Republicans or Democrats in Gallup's trend.”

“ Currently, 68% of Republicans prefer that Trump remain the party leader, while 31% want the party to have a new leader. Republican-leaning independents, however, are divided, with 47% wanting Trump to continue leading and 51% preferring a new voice.”

These polls seem to back up my lies. Big Grin
Nobody backs up the whoppers you tell, Comrade Cardfan. Support for a third party is higher than normal among Republicans at the moment because of the betrayal of Trump by the establishment GOP. However, the Lincoln Project is disintegrating and Trump will help to topple many RINOs in the 2022 midterms, so support for a third party will not last. Republicans will be reminded of the failures of all previous modern third parties and no Republican will want to see Biden or Harris in the White House for two terms.

you said that last time.  Cool Cool
Yes, I did, and I was right. Democrats had to rig the election and extend the time to count votes so that they could truck in additional ballots. You are wrong again. A third party may be formed but it will not be a factor in 2024 and it is unlikely Trump would support a third party movement. He is the leader of the GOP already, so it would not make much sense for him to endorse a third party.
Where did Democrats extend the time to count votes? 

How can The Trump wing win losing 20% (that’s being generous) of the vote to another party?
Asked and answered repeatedly. You should spend more time reading and less time lying.
#47
(02-15-2021, 11:42 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 10:36 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 10:13 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 10:07 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 10:02 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote: Nobody backs up the whoppers you tell, Comrade Cardfan. Support for a third party is higher than normal among Republicans at the moment because of the betrayal of Trump by the establishment GOP. However, the Lincoln Project is disintegrating and Trump will help to topple many RINOs in the 2022 midterms, so support for a third party will not last. Republicans will be reminded of the failures of all previous modern third parties and no Republican will want to see Biden or Harris in the White House for two terms.

you said that last time.  Cool Cool
Yes, I did, and I was right. Democrats had to rig the election and extend the time to count votes so that they could truck in additional ballots. You are wrong again. A third party may be formed but it will not be a factor in 2024 and it is unlikely Trump would support a third party movement. He is the leader of the GOP already, so it would not make much sense for him to endorse a third party.
Where did Democrats extend the time to count votes? 

How can The Trump wing win losing 20% (that’s being generous) of the vote to another party?
Asked and answered repeatedly. You should spend more time reading and less time lying.
Not Pennsylvania, Not Georgia, Not Wisconsin, Not Arizona.  Republicans made those decisions, so you telling a fib.  Big Grin

You have never answered how the Trump wing wins without a portion of its party.
#48
(02-16-2021, 12:25 AM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 11:42 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 10:36 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 10:13 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 10:07 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote: you said that last time.  Cool Cool
Yes, I did, and I was right. Democrats had to rig the election and extend the time to count votes so that they could truck in additional ballots. You are wrong again. A third party may be formed but it will not be a factor in 2024 and it is unlikely Trump would support a third party movement. He is the leader of the GOP already, so it would not make much sense for him to endorse a third party.
Where did Democrats extend the time to count votes? 

How can The Trump wing win losing 20% (that’s being generous) of the vote to another party?
Asked and answered repeatedly. You should spend more time reading and less time lying.
Not Pennsylvania, Not Georgia, Not Wisconsin, Not Arizona.  Republicans made those decisions, so you telling a fib.  Big Grin

You have never answered how the Trump wing wins without a portion of its party.
Liar. The Democrats on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended the deadline for receiving absentee ballots and counting them on a party line vote. You are trying to confuse multiple issues. Republicans tried to get vote counting suspended in several jurisdictions because Democrats illegally kicked out Republican vote count observers.

In those cases, Republicans filed for emergency retraining orders and requested the suspension of the counts until Republican observers were allowed to do resume observing the count, which was their legal right.

If you want details on other delays in the counts, then you can search through my previous posts. I am not going to waste time repeating everything for you.
#49
(02-16-2021, 12:59 AM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-16-2021, 12:25 AM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 11:42 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 10:36 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 10:13 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote: Yes, I did, and I was right. Democrats had to rig the election and extend the time to count votes so that they could truck in additional ballots. You are wrong again. A third party may be formed but it will not be a factor in 2024 and it is unlikely Trump would support a third party movement. He is the leader of the GOP already, so it would not make much sense for him to endorse a third party.
Where did Democrats extend the time to count votes? 

How can The Trump wing win losing 20% (that’s being generous) of the vote to another party?
Asked and answered repeatedly. You should spend more time reading and less time lying.
Not Pennsylvania, Not Georgia, Not Wisconsin, Not Arizona.  Republicans made those decisions, so you telling a fib.  Big Grin

You have never answered how the Trump wing wins without a portion of its party.
Liar. The Democrats on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended the deadline for receiving absentee ballots and counting them on a party line vote. You are trying to confuse multiple issues. Republicans tried to get vote counting suspended in several jurisdictions because Democrats illegally kicked out Republican vote count observers.

In those cases, Republicans filed for emergency retraining orders and requested the suspension of the counts until Republican observers were allowed to do resume observing the count, which was their legal right.

If you want details on other delays in the counts, then you can search through my previous posts. I am not going to waste time repeating everything for you.
1 out of 4 ain't bad, but that’s a bit of a technicality since you are talking the state SC and upheld by SCOTUS, but  I'll give it to you, Hooter.  You can tally one on the wall;  your other one now has a friend Big Grin  

BTW how many votes fell under that extended deadline?  How many did Uncle Joe smash Trump by? 

There were Republicans in the room per usual, but in order, to create CHAOS, paid crisis actors stood outside and proclaimed they couldn't see the tabulating.  

Are you trying to be disingenuous again?   I hope no one counts on you for information, but I'm pretty sure that's how you get your information.  Someone questions a something small and insignificant to undermine a whole position.  You swallow it hook, line, and sinker.  

  
I apologize for making you rehash your previous fables; let's get back on topic.  

So can Trump, or his heir apparent win without 15-30% of the Republican voting block?
#50
(02-16-2021, 10:03 AM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-16-2021, 12:59 AM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-16-2021, 12:25 AM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 11:42 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 10:36 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote: Where did Democrats extend the time to count votes? 

How can The Trump wing win losing 20% (that’s being generous) of the vote to another party?
Asked and answered repeatedly. You should spend more time reading and less time lying.
Not Pennsylvania, Not Georgia, Not Wisconsin, Not Arizona.  Republicans made those decisions, so you telling a fib.  Big Grin

You have never answered how the Trump wing wins without a portion of its party.
Liar. The Democrats on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended the deadline for receiving absentee ballots and counting them on a party line vote. You are trying to confuse multiple issues. Republicans tried to get vote counting suspended in several jurisdictions because Democrats illegally kicked out Republican vote count observers.

In those cases, Republicans filed for emergency retraining orders and requested the suspension of the counts until Republican observers were allowed to do resume observing the count, which was their legal right.

If you want details on other delays in the counts, then you can search through my previous posts. I am not going to waste time repeating everything for you.
1 out of 4 ain't bad, but that’s a bit of a technicality since you are talking the state SC and upheld by SCOTUS, but  I'll give it to you, Hooter.  You can tally one on the wall;  your other one now has a friend Big Grin  

BTW how many votes fell under that extended deadline?  How many did Uncle Joe smash Trump by? 

There were Republicans in the room per usual, but in order, to create CHAOS, paid crisis actors stood outside and proclaimed they couldn't see the tabulating.  

Are you trying to be disingenuous again?   I hope no one counts on you for information, but I'm pretty sure that's how you get your information.  Someone questions a something small and insignificant to undermine a whole position.  You swallow it hook, line, and sinker.  

  
I apologize for making you rehash your previous fables; let's get back on topic.  

So can Trump, or his heir apparent win without 15-30% of the Republican voting block?
Another lie. The Supreme Court has not upheld the unconstitutional actions of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. I have never seen two people more obsessed about one man than you and your little buddy vector. Move on. Tell us about all of the wonderful things that China Joe is doing for this country. Let Republicans decide what to do about Trump and the Republican Party. You just worry about what China Joe and the CCP is doing for your country.
#51
(02-16-2021, 10:24 AM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-16-2021, 10:03 AM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-16-2021, 12:59 AM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-16-2021, 12:25 AM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-15-2021, 11:42 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote: Asked and answered repeatedly. You should spend more time reading and less time lying.
Not Pennsylvania, Not Georgia, Not Wisconsin, Not Arizona.  Republicans made those decisions, so you telling a fib.  Big Grin

You have never answered how the Trump wing wins without a portion of its party.
Liar. The Democrats on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended the deadline for receiving absentee ballots and counting them on a party line vote. You are trying to confuse multiple issues. Republicans tried to get vote counting suspended in several jurisdictions because Democrats illegally kicked out Republican vote count observers.

In those cases, Republicans filed for emergency retraining orders and requested the suspension of the counts until Republican observers were allowed to do resume observing the count, which was their legal right.

If you want details on other delays in the counts, then you can search through my previous posts. I am not going to waste time repeating everything for you.
1 out of 4 ain't bad, but that’s a bit of a technicality since you are talking the state SC and upheld by SCOTUS, but  I'll give it to you, Hooter.  You can tally one on the wall;  your other one now has a friend Big Grin  

BTW how many votes fell under that extended deadline?  How many did Uncle Joe smash Trump by? 

There were Republicans in the room per usual, but in order, to create CHAOS, paid crisis actors stood outside and proclaimed they couldn't see the tabulating.  

Are you trying to be disingenuous again?   I hope no one counts on you for information, but I'm pretty sure that's how you get your information.  Someone questions a something small and insignificant to undermine a whole position.  You swallow it hook, line, and sinker.  

  
I apologize for making you rehash your previous fables; let's get back on topic.  

So can Trump, or his heir apparent win without 15-30% of the Republican voting block?
Another lie. The Supreme Court has not upheld the unconstitutional actions of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. I have never seen two people more obsessed about one man than you and your little buddy vector. Move on. Tell us about all of the wonderful things that China Joe is doing for this country. Let Republicans decide what to do about Trump and the Republican Party. You just worry about what China Joe and the CCP is doing for your country.
Sure it did.  4-4 with ACB abstaining in mid-October.  I mean it wasn't overturned?

I just posted a thread on Uncle Joe and the next period of Dem leadership.  

Ok, Hooter, I'll answer for you.  He can't.  There is enough of the party that will write in Gilligan before they vote for the kooks the Trump wing is putting up that will kill GOP and Patriot Party winning in most states even Trump strongholds.
#52
(02-16-2021, 10:55 AM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-16-2021, 10:24 AM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-16-2021, 10:03 AM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-16-2021, 12:59 AM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-16-2021, 12:25 AM)Cardfan1 Wrote: Not Pennsylvania, Not Georgia, Not Wisconsin, Not Arizona.  Republicans made those decisions, so you telling a fib.  Big Grin

You have never answered how the Trump wing wins without a portion of its party.
Liar. The Democrats on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended the deadline for receiving absentee ballots and counting them on a party line vote. You are trying to confuse multiple issues. Republicans tried to get vote counting suspended in several jurisdictions because Democrats illegally kicked out Republican vote count observers.

In those cases, Republicans filed for emergency retraining orders and requested the suspension of the counts until Republican observers were allowed to do resume observing the count, which was their legal right.

If you want details on other delays in the counts, then you can search through my previous posts. I am not going to waste time repeating everything for you.
1 out of 4 ain't bad, but that’s a bit of a technicality since you are talking the state SC and upheld by SCOTUS, but  I'll give it to you, Hooter.  You can tally one on the wall;  your other one now has a friend Big Grin  

BTW how many votes fell under that extended deadline?  How many did Uncle Joe smash Trump by? 

There were Republicans in the room per usual, but in order, to create CHAOS, paid crisis actors stood outside and proclaimed they couldn't see the tabulating.  

Are you trying to be disingenuous again?   I hope no one counts on you for information, but I'm pretty sure that's how you get your information.  Someone questions a something small and insignificant to undermine a whole position.  You swallow it hook, line, and sinker.  

  
I apologize for making you rehash your previous fables; let's get back on topic.  

So can Trump, or his heir apparent win without 15-30% of the Republican voting block?
Another lie. The Supreme Court has not upheld the unconstitutional actions of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. I have never seen two people more obsessed about one man than you and your little buddy vector. Move on. Tell us about all of the wonderful things that China Joe is doing for this country. Let Republicans decide what to do about Trump and the Republican Party. You just worry about what China Joe and the CCP is doing for your country.
Sure it did.  4-4 with ACB abstaining in mid-October.  I mean it wasn't overturned?

I just posted a thread on Uncle Joe and the next period of Dem leadership.  

Ok, Hooter, I'll answer for you.  He can't.  There is enough of the party that will write in Gilligan before they vote for the kooks the Trump wing is putting up that will kill GOP and Patriot Party winning in most states even Trump strongholds.
The case has been docketed and the Supreme Court has a hearing scheduled to decide whether to take the case on Friday. There are also at least two other cases still pending for Georgia and Michigan that have hearings scheduled on Friday. Rulings not to expedite the hearing of cases did not mean that the Supreme Court found against Trump or his allies. Nor did dismissals of cases on the basis of standing mean that the justices reviewed any evidence. Maybe the Supreme Court will decide not to get involved in the election - and they do seem like a cowardly lot - but they have not declined to hear the cases yet.
#53
The more I read some of the things the Trumpsters spew on here, I'm convinced that either they are playing the devil's advocate just to try and stir things up, are brainwashed or are members of one of the extreme right radical that groups that make up a sizeable portion of Trump's supporters.
[-] The following 1 user Likes The Outsider's post:
  • Cardfan1
#54
(02-16-2021, 11:19 AM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-16-2021, 10:55 AM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-16-2021, 10:24 AM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-16-2021, 10:03 AM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-16-2021, 12:59 AM)Hoot Gibson Wrote: Liar. The Democrats on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended the deadline for receiving absentee ballots and counting them on a party line vote. You are trying to confuse multiple issues. Republicans tried to get vote counting suspended in several jurisdictions because Democrats illegally kicked out Republican vote count observers.

In those cases, Republicans filed for emergency retraining orders and requested the suspension of the counts until Republican observers were allowed to do resume observing the count, which was their legal right.

If you want details on other delays in the counts, then you can search through my previous posts. I am not going to waste time repeating everything for you.
1 out of 4 ain't bad, but that’s a bit of a technicality since you are talking the state SC and upheld by SCOTUS, but  I'll give it to you, Hooter.  You can tally one on the wall;  your other one now has a friend Big Grin  

BTW how many votes fell under that extended deadline?  How many did Uncle Joe smash Trump by? 

There were Republicans in the room per usual, but in order, to create CHAOS, paid crisis actors stood outside and proclaimed they couldn't see the tabulating.  

Are you trying to be disingenuous again?   I hope no one counts on you for information, but I'm pretty sure that's how you get your information.  Someone questions a something small and insignificant to undermine a whole position.  You swallow it hook, line, and sinker.  

  
I apologize for making you rehash your previous fables; let's get back on topic.  

So can Trump, or his heir apparent win without 15-30% of the Republican voting block?
Another lie. The Supreme Court has not upheld the unconstitutional actions of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. I have never seen two people more obsessed about one man than you and your little buddy vector. Move on. Tell us about all of the wonderful things that China Joe is doing for this country. Let Republicans decide what to do about Trump and the Republican Party. You just worry about what China Joe and the CCP is doing for your country.
Sure it did.  4-4 with ACB abstaining in mid-October.  I mean it wasn't overturned?

I just posted a thread on Uncle Joe and the next period of Dem leadership.  

Ok, Hooter, I'll answer for you.  He can't.  There is enough of the party that will write in Gilligan before they vote for the kooks the Trump wing is putting up that will kill GOP and Patriot Party winning in most states even Trump strongholds.
The case has been docketed and the Supreme Court has a hearing scheduled to decide whether to take the case on Friday. There are also at least two other cases still pending for Georgia and Michigan that have hearings scheduled on Friday. Rulings not to expedite the hearing of cases did not mean that the Supreme Court found against Trump or his allies. Nor did dismissals of cases on the basis of standing mean that the justices reviewed any evidence. Maybe the Supreme Court will decide not to get involved in the election - and they do seem like a cowardly lot - but they have not declined to hear the cases yet.
Big Grin 


can’t wait.
#55
(02-16-2021, 09:21 PM)The Outsider Wrote: The more I read some of the things the Trumpsters spew on here, I'm convinced that either they are playing the devil's advocate just to try and stir things up, are brainwashed or are members of one of the extreme right radical that groups that make up a sizeable portion of Trump's supporters.
And the more I see your posts the more I'm convinced you're going to be like most of the liberals on here and your posts will continue to be 100% "Orange Man bad" and 0% facts...
#56
(02-17-2021, 01:17 AM)jetpilot Wrote:
(02-16-2021, 09:21 PM)The Outsider Wrote: The more I read some of the things the Trumpsters spew on here, I'm convinced that either they are playing the devil's advocate just to try and stir things up, are brainwashed or are members of one of the extreme right radical that groups that make up a sizeable portion of Trump's supporters.
And the more I see your posts the more I'm convinced you're going to be like most of the liberals on here and your posts will continue to be 100% "Orange Man bad" and 0% facts...

The facts are that Trump started out doing a fairly good job as President.  Then over time his character flaws took over and his Presidency started going down the tubes following the same trends as a lot of his businesses.  His history in business will show you, if you research them and be truthful with yourself, that he leaves them in financial peril and ruining peoples lives who are left to clean up his mess.  He has left the country in pretty much the same shape as he has many of his businesses.  I am certain that he and his supporters will come down on the wrong side of history.
[-] The following 1 user Likes The Outsider's post:
  • Cardfan1
#57
^^^Lol, you immediately prove me right with a comeback response that is 100% "Orange Man bad" and 0% facts...you liberals are all alike and too easy...
#58
(02-17-2021, 11:24 AM)jetpilot Wrote: ^^^Lol, you immediately prove me right with a comeback response that is 100% "Orange Man bad" and 0% facts...you liberals are all alike and too easy...

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/watch-...li=BBnb7Kz

Trump Plaza was the first of three casinos Mr. Trump owned before his gambling businesses in Atlantic City cratered and went bankrupt for good, leaving a trail of unpaid contractors and suppliers — and a bad taste for the Trump brand in this struggling city of 38,000.

“The money I took out of there was incredible,” he once told an interviewer.

In fact, he used little of his own money, a New York Times investigation found, and he shifted personal debts to the casinos, leaving the burden of his failures on investors and others who had gambled on his success.

This is a prime example of how Trump has done business over the years.  


What character traits do you admire about Trump?  I'll hang up and wait for your response.
[-] The following 1 user Likes The Outsider's post:
  • Cardfan1
#59
Mr. ImNotASocialistBut..., you seem to have a real problem with capitalism. It is a recurring theme throughout your intermittent posts here. Do you really believe that being a successful entrepreneur makes morally inferior to China Joe, who has raked in millions of dollars in bribes from foreign governments and oligarchs? Biden has created zero jobs in the private sector during his lifetime. Like most successful businessmen, Trump does not have a perfect record but most of his ventures having been very successful with a few failures sprinkled among them.
#60
(02-18-2021, 10:12 AM)Hoot Gibson Wrote: Mr. ImNotASocialistBut..., you seem to have a real problem with capitalism. It is a recurring theme throughout your intermittent posts here. Do you really believe that being a successful entrepreneur makes morally inferior to China Joe, who has raked in millions of dollars in bribes from foreign governments and oligarchs? Biden has created zero jobs in the private sector during his lifetime. Like most successful businessmen, Trump does not have a perfect record but most of his ventures having been very successful with a few failures sprinkled among them.
A few failures ?
SOB has filed Bankruptcy 6 times 

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)