Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
North Korea and Playground Rhetoric
#31
TheRealThing Wrote:Who really cares what you reject or what you think? You never have the first clue what you're talking about, be it the Sombrero brand of pseudo-spirituality or the secular. And the more ridiculous others make you look the more you retreat into denial and self delusion. But hey, not to worry. You're still tops with your posse. They're totally impressed with you.

To which because there is no reasonable recourse and because lies and blather are your forte, you dutifully obliged with the following...



The Urban Sombrero Wrote:My, you are a sad, wee man, aren't you. The truth? Your peacocking, Forum Boy gig? It's old. It's tired. It's boring. So, blah, blah, blah, peacock.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#32
TheRealThing Wrote:To which because there is no reasonable recourse and because lies and blather are your forte, you dutifully obliged with the following...

Onviously you, weelittleman, obviously you.

"You copy me."
You're obsessed with me."

Cry and whine. Cry and whine.

Geez.
#33
Chump sure loves to talk a big game but still has not done anything about N.K.
#34
War after war....
#35
Well, if Hillary had been elected, we would be paying NK not to launch missiles at us, like we paid 1/2 billion to Iran not to develop their military.
#36
Pick6 Wrote:Well, if Hillary had been elected, we would be paying NK not to launch missiles at us, like we paid 1/2 billion to Iran not to develop their military.

Donald Trump and his staff ran a better campaign, won the Rust Belt, bagged the electoral votes needed and won the election. Thus, Hillary Clinton is not relevant. The bombastic, schoolyard pissing contest between Trump and Kim Jong un is ridiculous, and would be laughable, except nuclear exchanges are deadly serious.
#37
NEWARKCATHOLICFAN Wrote:Chump sure loves to talk a big game but still has not done anything about N.K.


Why didn't someone do something about you?...You have no business even being allowed to run loose in this country? You should have been locked up with the keys thrown away. That's the real travesty..
#38
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:Onviously you, weelittleman, obviously you.

"You copy me."
You're obsessed with me."

Cry and whine. Cry and whine.

Geez.



Still better than being a liar and a hypocrite like you.

You do copy my writing style, chapter and verse, I've told you that from the outset. But as in everything else, whenever confronted you just retreat into La-La Land. After the election of 2024 I get to see what a genuine monkey puke swilling champion of homosexual deviancy looks like. I plan to bring a barf bag.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#39
TheRealThing Wrote:Still better than being a liar and a hypocrite like you.

You do copy my writing style, chapter and verse, I've told you that from the outset. But as in everything else, whenever confronted you just retreat into La-La Land. After the election of 2024 I get to see what a genuine monkey puke swilling champion of homosexual deviancy looks like. I plan to bring a barf bag.

Once again, Peacock, you fail. Utterly. Totally. Completely. Seven years is a long time to wait. The real hypocrisy, the real deceit is how a Bible thumping Peacock became a champion of a thrice married business cheat who duped the religious right. What a rube.
#40
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:Once again, Peacock, you fail. Utterly. Totally. Completely. Seven years is a long time to wait. The real hypocrisy, the real deceit is how a Bible thumping Peacock became a champion of a thrice married business cheat who duped the religious right. What a rube.


Trump doesn't profess to Christianity, though he does accept the sovereignty of Almighty God. And in that his theology is light years better than yours.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#41
TheRealThing Wrote:Trump doesn't profess to Christianity, though he does accept the sovereignty of Almighty God. And in that his theology is light years better than yours.

So, let's see, in your theology, a man, thrice married, a man who believes the rich are so desirous that they can grab a woman's genitalia willt nilly and meet with acceptance, a man who professed his ga-ga eyeing married women, wait, yes, this man accepts the "sovereignty of Almighty God." What a bozo Peacock.
#42
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:So, let's see, in your theology, a man, thrice married, a man who believes the rich are so desirous that they can grab a woman's genitalia willt nilly and meet with acceptance, a man who professed his ga-ga eyeing married women, wait, yes, this man accepts the "sovereignty of Almighty God." What a bozo Peacock.



Nope, in my theology a man married more than once may be forgiven of that particular sin if he genuinely repents. I mean, you just got through misinterpreting the passage on the woman at the well who'd had 5 husbands and numerous boyfriends. John 4:18 (KJV)
18 For thou hast had five husbands; and he whom thou now hast is not thy husband: in that saidst thou truly.

She was a little LOOSE shall we say? And yet the Lord did not hesitate to give her the water of everlasting life because she asked Him for It. You'd have boiled her in oil while castigating honest Christians. Every bit of it goes right over your head.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#43
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:So, let's see, in your theology, a man, thrice married, a man who believes the rich are so desirous that they can grab a woman's genitalia willt nilly and meet with acceptance, a man who professed his ga-ga eyeing married women, wait, yes, this man accepts the "sovereignty of Almighty God." What a bozo Peacock.

Here we go again....You just cant get over not being one of the desirous ones to be "grabbed"....Are you sure that you haven't had one of those government funded "operations"?
#44
Kudos to Secretary Tillerson and Trump administration's diplomatic efforts with China. China's agreeing to stop imports of iron and other materials, plus the statement to North Korea that if they engaged the US they'd be "on their own" have had impact on Kim Jong un.
#45
Bob Seger Wrote:Here we go again....You just cant get over not being one of the desirous ones to be "grabbed"....Are you sure that you haven't had one of those government funded "operations"?

Ah, Boob's "Evasion Tactic Manual, page 24"... I see you, Bob. Perhaps, Boob Sugar, you fancy Trump a champion of God's sovereignty also. Or, you could just be a zealot. Either way, I see you.
#46
TheRealThing Wrote:Nope, in my theology a man married more than once may be forgiven of that particular sin if he genuinely repents. I mean, you just got through misinterpreting the passage on the woman at the well who'd had 5 husbands and numerous boyfriends. John 4:18 (KJV)
18 For thou hast had five husbands; and he whom thou now hast is not thy husband: in that saidst thou truly.

She was a little LOOSE shall we say? And yet the Lord did not hesitate to give her the water of everlasting life because she asked Him for It. You'd have boiled her in oil while castigating honest Christians. Every bit of it goes right over your head.

Per usual, you are stuck in the mud of your own making. In one breath, you say the tweeting don is no Christian, meaning he has rejected the ultimate soverignty issue, and in the next you are touting him as some champion of the faith. Now, his lips may draw near, to woo folk like you, but his heart? Come on, now.

As for the woman at the well, Christ dealt wisely (she accepted him as Messiah), and corrected an error long embraced regarding the holiness of pieces of dirt. Keep trying, though, GeeWeeMe, keep trying.
#47
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:Ah, Boob's "Evasion Tactic Manual, page 24"... I see you, Bob. Perhaps, Boob Sugar, you fancy Trump a champion of God's sovereignty also. Or, you could just be a zealot. Either way, I see you.

Just more jibberish that has absolutely no reference to anything...


You are a fool,sis.
#48
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:Per usual, you are stuck in the mud of your own making. In one breath, you say the tweeting don is no Christian, meaning he has rejected the ultimate soverignty issue, and in the next you are touting him as some champion of the faith. Now, his lips may draw near, to woo folk like you, but his heart? Come on, now.

As for the woman at the well, Christ dealt wisely (she accepted him as Messiah), and corrected an error long embraced regarding the holiness of pieces of dirt. Keep trying, though, GeeWeeMe, keep trying.

Just cant leave the well story alone, can you. Let's see, that's just the 97th time now...Got news for you simpleton, it doesn't apply to everything that gets said,..What a bore you really are.
#49
TheRealThing Wrote:Like Daniel, I intend to stand in my lot at the end of my days.

Roosevelt was unfaithful as was JFK. Then there was was the epic exploits of Bronco Billy, and of of course the standard set by your hero Obama, to which no man will ever sink again. Of whatever indiscretions DJT is guilty, those happened BEFORE his marriage. And I double dog dare you to type Obama's name on the search bar and see what comes up. Trump is thrice the man Obama is,is. Meanwhile, your incessant defenses of homosexuality, abortion on demand and all things liberal are written here on this forum and will stand against you for all eternity at the judgment.

The passage you reference in Mathew, deals only and exclusively with the lost. I am saved, and therefore one of "the king's brethren" as mentioned in said passage. Feeding the hungry is a noble pursuit, but though I hate to break it to you, only the saved are brethren of God. Thus the reference here is for any who offer solace and comfort to God's children fleeing the horror of the antichrist during the great tribulation.

So not only are you misapplying Mathew 25 incorrectly, you have failed miserably to understand the context as it relates to sheep and goats. The sheep (set on God's right hand), go to be forever with God. The goats (the cursed) set on His left, are told to depart from Him into everlasting fire. In other words you are woefully ignorant of the truths of this scripture. And frankly, I would feel bad for anybody that far off base. I mean talk about getting picked off, brother not only did you not see the throw, you got tagged and the ump called you out before you knew a thing about it.

Consistent revisionism. And I mean consistent. And, yet again, strutting about the barnyard, plume wide...eh, peacock, peacock, peacock, master of nothing but your own tiny domain.

In context, have you oil in your lamp, have you a return on the Master's investment, or, foolish and selfish and self-willed, have you no oil, hid the talent, ignored the need. Blah, blah, blah, Peacock, you overstuffed turd.
#50
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:Consistent revisionism. And I mean consistent. And, yet again, strutting about the barnyard, plume wide...eh, peacock, peacock, peacock, master of nothing but your own tiny domain.

In context, have you oil in your lamp, have you a return on the Master's investment, or, foolish and selfish and self-willed, have you no oil, hid the talent, ignored the need. Blah, blah, blah, Peacock, you overstuffed turd.



Speaking of overstuffed birds, you're as full of it as a Christmas turkey. You can never put into reasonable terms any sort of argument. All you ever got is a name or a politically correct buzz word, or a dodge, or a misinterpretation, or a flat out lie. I notice you are somewhat obsessed with crap. It oozes out of every pore, you can scarcely make a post without some sort of reference to it, and everything you burp up on here smells a lot like it. Have you tried the gallon sized jugs of Listerine as I suggested yet? Or maybe you'd just be better off to only talk downwind?

Don't speak to me about The Master when you deny Him by denying that which He has written.
John 1:14 (KJV)
14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

Any of this filtering through that liberal bias of yours? He is the Word, and the Word is Him. Now which part of Him is it that you, the great Sombrero, would deny by parsing Scripture passages again?
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#51
TheRealThing Wrote:Speaking of overstuffed birds, you're as full of it as a Christmas turkey. You can never put into reasonable terms any sort of argument. All you ever got is a name or a politically correct buzz word, or a dodge, or a misinterpretation, or a flat out lie. I notice you are somewhat obsessed with crap. It oozes out of every pore, you can scarcely make a post without some sort of reference to it, and everything you burp up on here smells a lot like it. Have you tried the gallon sized jugs of Listerine as I suggested yet? Or maybe you'd just be better off not to only talk downwind?

😂 ⬆ I enjoyed that.

Spirit and truth worship occurs in the heart, and no piece of land is any holier than another. That time came and yet is. As for Listerine, I prefer Scope; however, that smell is uncleaned Peacock feathers emanating from "to thine own self be shoo."
#52
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:Per usual, you are stuck in the mud of your own making. In one breath, you say the tweeting don is no Christian, meaning he has rejected the ultimate soverignty issue, and in the next you are touting him as some champion of the faith. Now, his lips may draw near, to woo folk like you, but his heart? Come on, now.

As for the woman at the well, Christ dealt wisely (she accepted him as Messiah), and corrected an error long embraced regarding the holiness of pieces of dirt. Keep trying, though, GeeWeeMe, keep trying.



You blow your Biblical point in epic fashion and still, you come right back lecturing on it (wrong again BTW) demonstrating that you are both brainless and shameless.

But I guess I must be one of the only guys on this site that ever works, you're always sitting on top of your computer. I said DJT did not profess to be saved. I said further, that he nonetheless accepted God as being the sovereign force of this world and this universe. If you think those concepts are mutually exclusive, you are by definition ignorant. Therefore I don't in any way need to keep trying. ABTW, don't you think you'd need to be right about at least one point before you try inhabiting that fake high ground you keep planting your flag on? But since when did reality have the first thing to do with anything you say, right there Napoleon?

You do on the other hand champion everything evil, such as the abomination of homosexuality and abortion on demand, while claiming to be a Christian (even though the interpretation of every single Scripture you've ever referenced has been taken out of context and completely errant) Ironically and inexplicably all the while slamming DJT for his proper stand against abortion. And let's at least mention the fact that the President did this country a huge favor in banning transgenders from military service. We both know how badly you got hurt over that one.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#53

Once again, a legend in your own mind, WeeGeePee. And that's about it. Are we to suppose that Trump actually holds those views, when everything to this point in his life BEFORE needing votes ran otherwise? I don't fault DJT and his advisors in being shrewd, calculating, coalition counting politicos. I do fault you for allowing the tail of politics to wag the dog of faith. Screech on, Peacock, screech on.
#54
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:
Once again, a legend in your own mind, WeeGeePee. And that's about it. Are we to suppose that Trump actually holds those views, when everything to this point in his life BEFORE needing votes ran otherwise? I don't fault DJT and his advisors in being shrewd, calculating, coalition counting politicos. I do fault you for allowing the tail of politics to wag the dog of faith. Screech on, Peacock, screech on.



Right, it's just that you don't have the first clue what the Bible even teaches, but you are nonetheless qualified to judge everybody else. Don't fret, your posse are all glassy eyed.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#55
TheRealThing Wrote:Right, it's just that you don't have the first clue what the Bible even teaches, but you are nonetheless qualified to judge everybody else. Don't fret, your posse are all glassy eyed.

Over and over again, I have invited you over to the Religion Forum to debate. You read the Scripture with an Edna Prude lens. I sometimes wonder if you have even read John 4. I mean, I know you have, but, geez, really?

It seems to me, GeeWeePee, that you are a fine one to be whining about someone taking the tone of judgment. Come to think of it, that's rich.
#56
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:Over and over again, I have invited you over to the Religion Forum to debate. You read the Scripture with an Edna Prude lens. I sometimes wonder if you have even read John 4. I mean, I know you have, but, geez, really?

It seems to me, GeeWeePee, that you are a fine one to be whining about someone taking the tone of judgment. Come to think of it, that's rich.



No you've asked several times and I told you then as I tell you now, I refuse to waste my time debating a guy who rejects the inerrancy of God's word. I will not argue about your opinion. Enjoy your infection, I have no patience for it. ABTW, if you don't have the first clue what you're talking about here, what would change on the religion forum?
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)