[The Urban Sombrero]

Another post, another diversion. Same sex couples are absolutely entitled to equal protection under our Constitution - as is every American citizen, but that fact has nothing to do with your lack of honesty, Hack.

You confuse honest differences of opinion and political differences with personal integrity. I have honest differences of opinion with Dennis Kucinich and Alan Dershowitz. Yet, I believe that they are men of integrity. Your cowardly, dishonest posts give no indication that you hold yourself to such a standard. You simply parrot whatever lies that the DNC and its media surrogates feed you.

So you need to believe. Dershowitz recently made statements favorable to Trump's cause in terms of obstruction of justice and impeachment. That's too easy to see through.

You're like a dog that growls and backs up. You shout "absolutes" then back up. How convenient for you. Speaking of cowardice, it's a cowardly, fallacious way of debating.

[Hoot Gibson]

So you need to believe. Dershowitz recently made statements favorable to Trump's cause in terms of obstruction of justice and impeachment. That's too easy to see through.

You're like a dog that growls and backs up. You shout "absolutes" then back up. How convenient for you. Speaking of cowardice, it's a cowardly, fallacious way of debating.

I'm not backing up on personal integrity at all, Hack. I respect Dershowitz whether I agree with him or not because I believe that he expresses his own, honest opinions, with which I usually disagree. He does not dodge issues, he tackles them head on.

You, on the other hand, are slimy as an eel, preferring to avoid the truth when you find it inconvenient. You are a dishonest, cowardly debater. Not content to waste your own time, you are compelled to waste everybody else's time.

As for wasting time, I have wasted enough of my time for today arguing with a mental and moral midget. Good night, Hack.

[TheRealThing]

See the Special Counsel. Follow along, Scooter.

LOL, I saw the special counsel (not capitalized anywhere except a Sombrero post) and there was nothing there. You're going to have to explain your charge of your own. I refuse to write something you can twist or copy. Or was that just another one of your bluffs you can't back up?

[The Urban Sombrero]

I'm not backing up on personal integrity at all, Hack. I respect Dershowitz whether I agree with him or not because I believe that he expresses his own, honest opinions, with which I usually disagree. He does not dodge issues, he tackles them head on.

You, on the other hand, are slimy as an eel, preferring to avoid the truth when you find it inconvenient. You are a dishonest, cowardly debater. Not content to waste your own time, you are compelled to waste everybody else's time.

As for wasting time, I have wasted enough of my time for today arguing with a mental and moral midget. Good night, Hack.

Why, Hoot, a contender for fluffed up Peacock emerges. You won't engage on how political opinions differ from absolute truth. Yet you pat yourself on the back for your integrity. Interesting.

As for mental and moral midgetry, I would say the tweeting Don is making a run ar it.

[TheRealThing]

Why, Hoot, a contender for fluffed up Peacock emerges. You won't engage on how political opinions differ from absolute truth. Yet you pat yourself on the back for your integrity. Interesting.

As for mental and moral midgetry, I would say the tweeting Don is making a run ar it.

The smaller the mind, the greater the fascination.