Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
trump-claims-credit-chicago-strike-force-address-gun-viole
#1
When asked if Trump is “correct in taking credit for these initiatives,” Navarro said that conversations about the new strike force started under former President Barack Obama.


https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-claims-...12946.html
#2
The disembodied spirit of Dick Nixon says, "Hey, ol' Tricky was on the cover of TIME 55 times. That ol' Don sure can exaggerate."
#3
NEWARKCATHOLICFAN Wrote:When asked if Trump is “correct in taking credit for these initiatives,” Navarro said that conversations about the new strike force started under former President Barack Obama.


https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-claims-...12946.html
Obama talked about setting up a task force to address Chicago gun violence. Trump is creating a task force. Yet, you think that Obama deserves credit for creating the task force?

Like Obama, you are a talker. Trump is a man of action. Is that why you hate him so?
#4
Hoot Gibson Wrote:Obama talked about setting up a task force to address Chicago gun violence. Trump is creating a task force. Yet, you think that Obama deserves credit for creating the task force?

Like Obama, you are a talker. Trump is a man of action. Is that why you hate him so?

Osama bin Laden is dead.
#5
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:Osama bin Laden is dead.
So are the brave men who died in Benghazi as Obama and Hillary slept after taking no action to protect or rescue them, Hack. After an 8 year reign of incompetence and inaction, Obama had strengthen the hands of all of this nation's enemies, including Iran, North Korea, China, Russia, and Cuba. How do you manage to live in such a great country and fail to give it a patriotic embrace, Hack?
#6
Hoot Gibson Wrote:So are the brave men who died in Benghazi as Obama and Hillary slept after taking no action to protect or rescue them, Hack. After an 8 year reign of incompetence and inaction, Obama had strengthen the hands of all of this nation's enemies, including Iran, North Korea, China, Russia, and Cuba. How do you manage to live in such a great country and fail to give it a patriotic embrace, Hack?

Osama bin Laden is dead. See your own premise.
#7
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:Osama bin Laden is dead. See your own premise.
Obama talked about forming a task force. Trump is forming a task force. A talker versus a doer. That is but one fundamental difference in Obama and a competent president. Obama was too busy obstructing justice and providing aid, comfort, and cash to this nation's enemies to have any real accomplishments to his credit. You should venture out of your mommy's basement a little more often, doing more, and talking less yourself.
#8
Hoot Gibson Wrote:Obama talked about forming a task force. Trump is forming a task force. A talker versus a doer. That is but one fundamental difference in Obama and a competent president. Obama was too busy obstructing justice and providing aid, comfort, and cash to this nation's enemies to have any real accomplishments to his credit. You should venture out of your mommy's basement a little more often, doing more, and talking less yourself.

Ah, Hoot, a retreat into the world of your ilk. Aren't you late for a training? Perhaps you and TRT can bury the hatchet of bygone days. Glad to be of service.

Osama bin Laden is dead. Healthcare reform was passed. The test is not whether one agrees with the policies. Your premise was misleading and self-serving.
#9
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:Ah, Hoot, a retreat into the world of your ilk. Aren't you late for a training? Perhaps you and TRT can bury the hatchet of bygone days. Glad to be of service.

Osama bin Laden is dead. Healthcare reform was passed. The test is not whether one agrees with the policies. Your premise was misleading and self-serving.
Another pitiful attempt to change the subject. When you cannot win a debate, run away from it. That should be your motto because it certainly explains your behavior.
#10
Hoot Gibson Wrote:Another pitiful attempt to change the subject. When you cannot win a debate, run away from it. That should be your motto because it certainly explains your behavior.

Barack Obama took action. He was deliberative true enough. Your premise is false.

The WASHINGTON MONTHLY recently listed 50 Obama accomplishments. Now, you (nor I) would agree with all of tge policies behind them (you maybe none), but your premise is false.
#11
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:Barack Obama took action. He was deliberative true enough. Your premise is false.
Barack Obama did not form a commission to address Chicago gun violence and Trump is creating one. You are a liar, with the mental acumen of a third grader (at best).
#12
Hoot Gibson Wrote:Barack Obama did not form a commission to address Chicago gun violence and Trump is creating one. You are a liar, with the mental acumen of a third grader (at best).

Ah, Hoot, "acumen" noteithstanding, yet another erroneous premise.

It does not seem to me that I addressed the commission. It seems I addressed your going beyond the commission to a more general premise, which was false and self-serving. Boomerrang.
#13
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:Ah, Hoot, "acumen" noteithstanding, yet another erroneous premise.

It does not seem to me that I addressed the commission. It seems I addressed your going beyond the commission to a more general premise, which was false and self-serving. Boomerrang.
You are quite correct. You did not address the OP. You seldom do. Too much work I suppose, for a cellar dweller such as yourself, Hack.
#14
Hoot Gibson Wrote:You are quite correct. You did not address the OP. You seldom do. Too much work I suppose, for a cellar dweller such as yourself, Hack.

Ah, dear Hoot, grouchy from those long, tedious, classified meetings I suppose. Your general premise (Obama's lack of action) was incorrect and self-serving. Sometimes action, sometimes caution, and a wise man knows which is called for, but, then again, I'm sure they cover such in the trainings you attend.
#15
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:Ah, dear Hoot, grouchy from those long, tedious, classified meetings I suppose. Your general premise (Obama's lack of action) was incorrect and self-serving. Sometimes action, sometimes caution, and a wise man knows which is called for, but, then again, I'm sure they cover such in the trainings you attend.
I do not attend classified meetings, nor do I handle classified documents, I never said that I did. You are lying again, Hack, and it is one of many things for which you have no aptitude. Life is so much simpler when one simply tells the truth. You should try it some time because you certainly have trouble maintaining any semblance of consistency among your whoppers.

As for my training in the proper handling of sensitive and/or classified information, that training consists of interactive online training and testing.
#16
Hoot Gibson Wrote:I do not attend classified meetings, nor do I handle classified documents, I never said that I did. You are lying again, Hack, and it is one of many things for which you have no aptitude.

As for my training in the proper handling of sensitive and/or classified information, that training consists of interactive online training and testing.

Ah, nor do I dwell cellar-style. However, in that you, quite somberly, mentioned your expertise on all things classified, why, it stood to reason.

Again, Barack Obama took many actions, had many accomplishments, though "accomplishment" lies in the eye of the beholder, getting back to your general premise.
#17
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:Ah, nor do I dwell cellar-style. However, in that you, quite somberly, mentioned your expertise on all things classified, why, it stood to reason.

Again, Barack Obama took many actions, had many accomplishments, though "accomplishment" lies in the eye of the beholder, getting back to your general premise.
Don't waste your time trying to rationalize your lies. You have never had any credibility here, so regaining credibility is not in the cards.

Losers dwell in cellars and you are nothing if not a loser.
#18
Hoot Gibson Wrote:Don't waste your time trying to rationalize your lies. You have never had any credibility here, so regaining credibility is not in the cards.

Again, "credibility" is in the eye of the beholder. What you, Uncle Jeb, Cuzzin Wash and Aunt Sarah conclude is a foregone conclusion, settles nothing, and, I guess, gives you some measure of "Forum Boy." What is not in the cards is for the tweeting Don to grow up, toughen that skin, and work on that narcissism.
#19
⬆ James Comey outwitted the tweeting Don, and no matter how it stings, or how you folk dance around it, Donald Trump sought to obstruct justice.
#20
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:Ah, nor do I dwell cellar-style. However, in that you, quite somberly, mentioned your expertise on all things classified, why, it stood to reason.

Again, Barack Obama took many actions, had many accomplishments, though "accomplishment" lies in the eye of the beholder, getting back to your general premise.



I must have missed his many accomplishments, care to name one of them?
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#21
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:Again, "credibility" is in the eye of the beholder. What you, Uncle Jeb, Cuzzin Wash and Aunt Sarah conclude is a foregone conclusion, settles nothing, and, I guess, gives you some measure of "Forum Boy." What is not in the cards is for the tweeting Don to grow up, toughen that skin, and work on that narcissism.
Honesty is not in the eye of the beholder and you have repeatedly demonstrated that you are a serial liar, Hack. If you want people to pretend that you have credibility, then I suggest you stick to a forum where moral relativism is embraced and dishonest political hackery is celebrated. This is not that forum.
#22
Hoot Gibson Wrote:Honesty is not in the eye of the beholder and you have repeatedly demonstrated that you are a serial liar, Hack. If you want people to pretend that you have credibility, then I suggest you stick to a forum where moral relativism is embraced and dishonest political hackery is celebrated. This is not that forum.

Oh, it is in the eye of the beholder, or the computer-modulated training specialist. Sure it is. Unless ignorance of human nature lies within. Hoot?
#23
⬆ James Comey outwitted the tweeting Don. See Special Counsel.
#24
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:Oh, it is in the eye of the beholder, or the computer-modulated training specialist. Sure it is. Unless ignorance of human nature lies within. Hoot?
No, honesty is an absolute, Hack. Actually, I am not a training specialist, but I do develop training materials that are used in training paralegals and JAG attorneys, It is amazing that even you, a habitual liar, cannot help but to stumble upon the truth from time to time. I say stumble, because finding truth is clearly not a priority for you.
#25
Hoot Gibson Wrote:No, honesty is an absolute, Hack. Actually, I am not a training specialist, but I do develop training materials that are used in training paralegals and JAG attorneys, It is amazing that even you, a habitual liar, cannot help but to stumble upon the truth from time to time. I say stumble, because finding truth is clearly not a priority for you.

Ah, some truth is absolute. Let's take a for instance: Christ died for our sins. I view that as absolute. Now, whether or not same-sex couples are covered by equal protection in a Constitutionally-governed republic? Is that absolute?

By the way, James Comey outwitted the tweeting Don. See Special Counsel.
#26
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:Ah, some truth is absolute. Let's take a for instance: Christ died for our sins. I view that as absolute. Now, whether or not same-sex couples are covered by equal protection in a Constitutionally-governed republic? Is that absolute?

By the way, James Comey outwitted the tweeting Don. See Special Counsel.



Must have missed that.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#27
TheRealThing Wrote:Must have missed that.

No doubt, as, somehow, Hannity saw fit to exclude it. Ah, but, friendo, 'tis true, 'tis true.
#28
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:No doubt, as, somehow, Hannity saw fit to exclude it. Ah, but, friendo, 'tis true, 'tis true.



Right, it's just that you can in no way explain it or validate it outside of Yaa-hoo or MSNBC
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#29
TheRealThing Wrote:Right, it's just that you can in no way explain it or validate it outside of Yaa-hoo or MSNBC

See the Special Counsel. Follow along, Scooter.
#30
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:Ah, some truth is absolute. Let's take a for instance: Christ died for our sins. I view that as absolute. Now, whether or not same-sex couples are covered by equal protection in a Constitutionally-governed republic? Is that absolute?

By the way, James Comey outwitted the tweeting Don. See Special Counsel.
Another post, another diversion. Same sex couples are absolutely entitled to equal protection under our Constitution - as is every American citizen, but that fact has nothing to do with your lack of honesty, Hack.

You confuse honest differences of opinion and political differences with personal integrity. I have honest differences of opinion with Dennis Kucinich and Alan Dershowitz. Yet, I believe that they are men of integrity. Your cowardly, dishonest posts give no indication that you hold yourself to such a standard. You simply parrot whatever lies that the DNC and its media surrogates feed you.

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)