[Harry Rex Vonner]

How does being a medical doctor qualify him to make laws in Washington? FTR, he couldn't even pass the accepted board for his chosen profession, so him and a few more made their own board. Alison was more than a gopher, she was a lawyer, and successful at that. She worked with domestic abuse cases, among other things to help Kentuckians. She also is on the board of a christian, feeding the needy, program. She is very qualified in the voting process. She collaborated with with clerks across the state to get people to vote. And all the falsehoods you guys claim about her loyalty to Obama doesn't jive with what she says she is for. It sounds to me like Alison gets under your skin on a personal level. Tell us the real story between you two.

http://alisonforkentucky.com/issues/

Your post indicates that you have no knowledge in regard to how a law firm operates. Little Lundergan worked in domestic abuse cases. Unless we are talking about parties with a lot of money, no experienced lawyer with any ability works in domestic abuse cases. That is the lowest rung on the ladder and, often, the work is done pro bono (no fees). If that is Little Lundergan's claim to fame in the legal profession, she was, without any doubt, a gopher.

Do you really believe that she has accomplished anything of true note as secretary of state? As I have stated before, and as every informed person knows, the office runs itself. So, if something came out of her office, it is highly doubtful that she had any input in its development. And, of course, the deal was to attract more Democrat voters. She is never there. The office, like under former secretaries, runs itself. The secretary is a figurehead and nothing else. Again, she has done nothing.

The board of a "Christian, feeding the needy, organization"? And you find that to be impressive? Most anyone with any status in the community is on such boards. Believe me, as one who has served on many of them, it means nothing.

Her resume is even thinner than I suspected. Her only qualification is that she is not Mitch McConnell and she is a liberal Democrat. Of course, regardless of what she says (Words are cheap.), she is merely a puppet for her daddy, for her handlers, for Obama, and for wild eyed liberals everywhere. She is a joke.

What can you tell us about Andy? Is he employed? Why doesn't he appear with her at rallies? Why are they hiding him? Does he just do as he is told by Jerry?

[TheRealThing]

FTR, the only debate date Mitch would agree to was a date he knew she was scheduled to be out of town. If anyone doesn't realize Mitch is scared, they aren't paying attention. The key is democrats getting out to vote. They can't stay home and hope.

Im not sure that's a bad move on Mitchs part.
He will without the debate, so why risk it. Voters aren't going to buy into the whole "hes scared" thing.

LOL, it's the left who is scared. Their favored propaganda ploy of getting up on TV to proclaim that "Americans want so and so" just to bolster their own agenda ain't working so well right now. In truth, Americans don't want any part of most of the liberal agenda but, by way of singing to the choir, part of the Dem base are those who want to be taken care of, and therefore vote for the Dems to keep the checks rolling in. The 'everything's okay' attitude of the slumbering voter is much shaken going into this election season. Folks will vote.

Just about every pundit and pollster on the planet is giving the nod to the Republicans this November and anybody could see why. Failed policy after failed policy. Planetary embarrassment characterizes our juvenile foreign policy blunders, all backed up by lies and yet more unfulfillable promises.

The La-La's have an unbelievable propensity for self deception I agree, but this is one situation even they're having trouble hiding behind a smiley face or pajama boy. Mitch scared? :hilarious:

[tvtimeout]

LOL, it's the left who is scared. Their favored propaganda ploy of getting up on TV to proclaim that "Americans want so and so" just to bolster their own agenda ain't working so well right now. In truth, Americans don't want any part of most of the liberal agenda but, by way of singing to the choir, part of the Dem base are those who want to be taken care of, and therefore vote for the Dems to keep the checks rolling in. The 'everything's okay' attitude of the slumbering voter is much shaken going into this election season. Folks will vote.

Just about every pundit and pollster on the planet is giving the nod to the Republicans this November and anybody could see why. Failed policy after failed policy. Planetary embarrassment characterizes our juvenile foreign policy blunders, all backed up by lies and yet more unfulfillable promises.

The La-La's have an unbelievable propensity for self deception I agree, but this is one situation even they're having trouble hiding behind a smiley face or pajama boy. Mitch scared? :hilarious:

Wait a minute have we not had the popular vote in very President election since 92...

[tvtimeout]

LOL, it's the left who is scared. Their favored propaganda ploy of getting up on TV to proclaim that "Americans want so and so" just to bolster their own agenda ain't working so well right now. In truth, Americans don't want any part of most of the liberal agenda but, by way of singing to the choir, part of the Dem base are those who want to be taken care of, and therefore vote for the Dems to keep the checks rolling in. The 'everything's okay' attitude of the slumbering voter is much shaken going into this election season. Folks will vote.

Just about every pundit and pollster on the planet is giving the nod to the Republicans this November and anybody could see why. Failed policy after failed policy. Planetary embarrassment characterizes our juvenile foreign policy blunders, all backed up by lies and yet more unfulfillable promises.

The La-La's have an unbelievable propensity for self deception I agree, but this is one situation even they're having trouble hiding behind a smiley face or pajama boy. Mitch scared? :hilarious:

Anybody seen those WMD's that ISIS is using yet? 4500 Americans dead and not a word! Criminal at best.

[tvtimeout]

Your post indicates that you have no knowledge in regard to how a law firm operates. Little Lundergan worked in domestic abuse cases. Unless we are talking about parties with a lot of money, no experienced lawyer with any ability works in domestic abuse cases. That is the lowest rung on the ladder and, often, the work is done pro bono (no fees). If that is Little Lundergan's claim to fame in the legal profession, she was, without any doubt, a gopher.

Do you really believe that she has accomplished anything of true note as secretary of state? As I have stated before, and as every informed person knows, the office runs itself. So, if something came out of her office, it is highly doubtful that she had any input in its development. And, of course, the deal was to attract more Democrat voters. She is never there. The office, like under former secretaries, runs itself. The secretary is a figurehead and nothing else. Again, she has done nothing.

The board of a "Christian, feeding the needy, organization"? And you find that to be impressive? Most anyone with any status in the community is on such boards. Believe me, as one who has served on many of them, it means nothing.

Her resume is even thinner than I suspected. Her only qualification is that she is not Mitch McConnell and she is a liberal Democrat. Of course, regardless of what she says (Words are cheap.), she is merely a puppet for her daddy, for her handlers, for Obama, and for wild eyed liberals everywhere. She is a joke.
What can you tell us about Andy? Is he employed? Why doesn't he appear with her at rallies? Why are they hiding him? Does he just do as he is told by Jerry?

If she was handled by Obama why would Clinton come down here... if you knew as much as you think you did you would know that the Obama's and Clinton's hate eachother... makes no sense for Clinton to come down to help out his enemy...

Mitch being in office for 30 years, for people that claim they want less government it seems the handouts in Eastern Kentucky keep on rolling in from Mitch... vote Libertarian, if you truely believe in less government if not just say you are a neo con and I will drop the subject.

[TheRealThing]

If she was handled by Obama why would Clinton come down here... if you knew as much as you think you did you would know that the Obama's and Clinton's hate eachother... makes no sense for Clinton to come down to help out his enemy...

Mitch being in office for 30 years, for people that claim they want less government it seems the handouts in Eastern Kentucky keep on rolling in from Mitch... vote Libertarian, if you truely believe in less government if not just say you are a neo con and I will drop the subject.

You're a real riot there tvtime. You've done your best to make friends with RV because you're desperate to make a splash on this forum. And you got smacked down for your efforts over in the religion forum. Let me give you some friendly advice. You haven't been around long enough to even understand what you're talking about most of the time. Obama has the latest and greatest lefties installed in advisory positions within his administration. All these appointments are gifts to the extreme left for the financial support they have mounted for his presidency.

These same power hitters are orchestrating the funding for the Grimes campaign. Now, do I think you're sharp enough to recognize this well publicized attempt by Hollywood liberals to steer the direction of this nation further left? Going by your post, obviously not. Another point I would make to you while you suppose yourself to be enlightening me about the world of politics. I have posted on many occasions now as to the make up of the zoo, which is the base of the Democratic Party. Many of them hate each other but, because for the short term they are more about getting what they want than who they must associate with to get it, they are willing to snuggle up to special interest weirdos they would otherwise rather not. They wrongly believe they will make the split one day in the future after their entitlement barrels are full. For now in their mind, the enemy of their enemy is their friend. IMO, they'll all wind up scratching each other's eyes out before it's all over.

And of course the Clintons and the Obamas are at odds with each other. I would bet one of the hardest things Billy Boy ever had to do was come out on that stage at the DNC and brag up the amateur hour exploits of Barack Obama. And, Hillary fell on her own sword when she defended this administration and her handling of Benghazi. And FTR, memorizing a catch phrase or political term such as your oft quoted favorite, military industrial complex, doesn't make you a libertarian. Your arguments are always liberal and so are the candidates you support. But, by all means, if you think you've got me on the ropes somehow, rage on. Don't cut me any slack by dropping the subject.

If Mitch wasn't a real problem, they wouldn't have gone to such lengths to get him out of the way. And, he'll be reelected as he should be given the alternative of another novice getting elected to high office. At any rate, this is no presidential campaign, it is a Senatorial campaign. Kentucky likes her Republican leadership despite the propaganda. TEAM MITCH

[TheRealVille]

Your post indicates that you have no knowledge in regard to how a law firm operates. Little Lundergan worked in domestic abuse cases. Unless we are talking about parties with a lot of money, no experienced lawyer with any ability works in domestic abuse cases. That is the lowest rung on the ladder and, often, the work is done pro bono (no fees). If that is Little Lundergan's claim to fame in the legal profession, she was, without any doubt, a gopher.

Do you really believe that she has accomplished anything of true note as secretary of state? As I have stated before, and as every informed person knows, the office runs itself. So, if something came out of her office, it is highly doubtful that she had any input in its development. And, of course, the deal was to attract more Democrat voters. She is never there. The office, like under former secretaries, runs itself. The secretary is a figurehead and nothing else. Again, she has done nothing.

The board of a "Christian, feeding the needy, organization"? And you find that to be impressive? Most anyone with any status in the community is on such boards. Believe me, as one who has served on many of them, it means nothing.

Her resume is even thinner than I suspected. Her only qualification is that she is not Mitch McConnell and she is a liberal Democrat. Of course, regardless of what she says (Words are cheap.), she is merely a puppet for her daddy, for her handlers, for Obama, and for wild eyed liberals everywhere. She is a joke.

What can you tell us about Andy? Is he employed? Why doesn't he appear with her at rallies? Why are they hiding him? Does he just do as he is told by Jerry?

What can you tell me about Paul's experience? You sent him.

[TheRealVille]

LOL, it's the left who is scared. Their favored propaganda ploy of getting up on TV to proclaim that "Americans want so and so" just to bolster their own agenda ain't working so well right now. In truth, Americans don't want any part of most of the liberal agenda but, by way of singing to the choir, part of the Dem base are those who want to be taken care of, and therefore vote for the Dems to keep the checks rolling in. The 'everything's okay' attitude of the slumbering voter is much shaken going into this election season. Folks will vote.

Just about every pundit and pollster on the planet is giving the nod to the Republicans this November and anybody could see why. Failed policy after failed policy. Planetary embarrassment characterizes our juvenile foreign policy blunders, all backed up by lies and yet more unfulfillable promises.

The La-La's have an unbelievable propensity for self deception I agree, but this is one situation even they're having trouble hiding behind a smiley face or pajama boy. Mitch scared? :hilarious:

They are giving the nod to the republicans for your election stealing redistricting.

[Harry Rex Vonner]

They are giving the nod to the republicans for your election stealing redistricting.

Gerrymandering is as American as apple pie, so to speak. Since there are more Republican governors and more Republican controlled state legislatures, Republicans have the upper hand in redistricting. That is how it goes. It is legal and has nothing to do with stealing. Stealing is what you Democrats do to my pay check and investment income.

[Harry Rex Vonner]

What can you tell me about Paul's experience? You sent him.

Anyone who believes that Little Lundergan has more experience in the real world than did Paul when he ran is obviously uninformed or ultra partisan or both. Little Lundergan's level of experience in life more parallels that of Obama's older daughter. I believe she is 15 or 16 and appears to be a typical naive teenager. Now, Little Lundergan is a bit older but her level of maturity is about the same. And from her appearances, we can assume that she is better at memorizing than is the Obama girl. As I said, Little Lundergan wouldn't know the difference between ISSA and ice cream until Jerry, the criminal, tells her.

And, I still wonder about Andy Lundergan. Has he been kidnapped by ISSA? I sure don't want him to be the next one beheaded. Has anyone seen him? Would anyone recognize him if the did see him? Does he have gainful employment? Surely, he isn't drawing welfare.

[RunItUpTheGut]

Wait a minute have we not had the popular vote in very President election since 92...

Were you alive in 2004?

[TheRealThing]

Gerrymandering is as American as apple pie, so to speak. Since there are more Republican governors and more Republican controlled state legislatures, Republicans have the upper hand in redistricting. That is how it goes. It is legal and has nothing to do with stealing. Stealing is what you Democrats do to my pay check and investment income.

Now that's funny! Thanks for the laugh Harry. And you're right, there are many more Republican Governors and state legislatures. That doesn't stop the liberal from declaring himself a majority from among the common folk though. We elect Republicans for a reason, that reason is to legislate on our behalf. One of these days folks are going to wake up and realize that they allowed con artists to steal their just and duly elected representation right out from under their noses. When Democrats are in the majority we get things like ObamaCare rammed down our throats, while vacuous ciphers ala Nancy Pelosi lead the DNC choir in songs of adoration. The Republicans were locked out on that deal because, thanks to some late night Senate rules shenanigans, the Dems didn't need any Republican votes to get it passed.

Somebody on here just referred to the deliberations of the US Congress leading up to the Iraq War of 2003 as "criminal." If they were, one would have to put Nancy at the front of the line, she was "all in."

[TheRealVille]

Gerrymandering is as American as apple pie, so to speak. Since there are more Republican governors and more Republican controlled state legislatures, Republicans have the upper hand in redistricting. That is how it goes. It is legal and has nothing to do with stealing. Stealing is what you Democrats do to my pay check and investment income.

This democrat pays taxes a plenty, and don't cry about it like you guys. My investments have done very well for the last 4 years. With record stock market numbers for quite awhile now, your investments should be doing equally as well. If not, you need a new financial guy.

[TheRealVille]

Anyone who believes that Little Lundergan has more experience in the real world than did Paul when he ran is obviously uninformed or ultra partisan or both. Little Lundergan's level of experience in life more parallels that of Obama's older daughter. I believe she is 15 or 16 and appears to be a typical naive teenager. Now, Little Lundergan is a bit older but her level of maturity is about the same. And from her appearances, we can assume that she is better at memorizing than is the Obama girl. As I said, Little Lundergan wouldn't know the difference between ISSA and ice cream until Jerry, the criminal, tells her.

And, I still wonder about Andy Lundergan. Has he been kidnapped by ISSA? I sure don't want him to be the next one beheaded. Has anyone seen him? Would anyone recognize him if the did see him? Does he have gainful employment? Surely, he isn't drawing welfare.

She has more political experience than Paul did, when you sent him. I would say your vote for him was strictly partisan, if you think he had more political, or law making experience than her at the same time in each's campaign. If he had more political/law making experience before he went to Washington, name it.

[RunItUpTheGut]

Im going to try to refinance the house while rates are so low. I bought at a bad time.
With the numbers I have figured, if I could drop my interest rate to 3.5 or in that neighborhood, I could borrow an extra 20,000 to blow on renovations and my monthly payment wouldn't go up and my years would probably go down.

The housing market is something that is still not where it needs to be. My generation got screwed on that one.

[Harry Rex Vonner]

She has more political experience than Paul did, when you sent him. I would say your vote for him was strictly partisan, if you think he had more political, or law making experience than her at the same time in each's campaign. If he had more political/law making experience before he went to Washington, name it.

O.K. Give me a list of her accomplishments since, not during, high school. Tell us about her accomplishments.. As they say, pee or get off the pot.

[TheRealVille]

O.K. Give me a list of her accomplishments since, not during, high school. Tell us about her accomplishments.. As they say, pee or get off the pot.

Dodging why you sent Paul? I understand. You know as well as me that he had zero political experience, yet you sent him. If she has not a lot of experience, and that is what you say over and over about her, why did you send an inexperienced Paul? Are you a hypocrite, or not? I listed her accomplishments. If you think they are from high school, prove it. You especially should know about the burden of proof.

[TheRealVille]

Im going to try to refinance the house while rates are so low. I bought at a bad time.
With the numbers I have figured, if I could drop my interest rate to 3.5 or in that neighborhood, I could borrow an extra 20,000 to blow on renovations and my monthly payment wouldn't go up and my years would probably go down.

The housing market is something that is still not where it needs to be. My generation got screwed on that one.

When I first bought the first house in Paintsville, it was around 6%. My second house was bought at about 5%. I refinanced at somewhere in the 3's, and the payment went down about 200 a month.


It'll come back. It's already a lot better than it was.

WORKING out the right time to buy a house is always hard. Homes are horribly expensive. The slightest up- or down-tick in the market can cost or save huge sums. In America, those mulling a purchase are hearing particularly confusing signals. Prices have soared for the past couple of years, suggesting that those who wait will suffer. But slowing prices, weak construction data and jitters about a possible interest-rate rise (among other worries) suggest that prices might drop, as they did five years ago. Perhaps scrambling onto the housing ladder now is unwise after all?

Homebuyers have cause to be nervous: during the crisis of 2008 and 2009 prices fell by 60% in some places. Yet since then America has bounced back remarkably. Median property prices in the north-east are well above previous highs, having risen by 51% between 2009 and 2013. Prices in the Midwest and South pipped previous peaks in 2012. Only in the West are homes worth less now than in the bubbly mid-2000s. Yet prices there are rising fast: by over 11% in 2013. At that pace, they will beat past records by the end of this year.

http://www.economist.com/news/united-sta...buy-now-or

[TheRealThing]

Dodging why you sent Paul? I understand. You know as well as me that he had zero political experience, yet you sent him. If she has not a lot of experience, and that is what you say over and over about her, why did you send an inexperienced Paul? Are you a hypocrite, or not? I listed her accomplishments. If you think they are from high school, prove it. You especially should know about the burden of proof.

The Paul election is over and as a result we have another Republican Senator. Now, as is applicable to the Grimes list of accomplishments. We were able to put quite a resume together for our son as he was about to enter college. He has volunteered for community service based work for most of his life. That, and his Church service, along with other nonprofit volunteer accomplishments, made for quite impressive reading. I didn't realize we had gained such a leg up on grooming him for the governor's seat! :Thumbs:

[TheRealVille]

The Paul election is over and as a result we have another Republican Senator. Now, as is applicable to the Grimes list of accomplishments. We were able to put quite a resume together for our son as he was about to enter college. He has volunteered for community service based work for most of his life. That, and his Church service, along with other nonprofit volunteer accomplishments, made for quite impressive reading. I didn't realize we had gained such a leg up on grooming him for the governor's seat! :Thumbs:

The question was brought up about her experience. When questioning someone's experience for the senators job, you have to compare who you guys were willing to send, that had less experience. Why question her experience, if you sent a lesser experienced person to the same position? You guys are merely showing your partisanship. Why not just admit what is true?

[TheRealThing]

The question was brought up about her experience. When questioning someone's experience for the senators job, you have to compare who you guys were willing to send, that had less experience. Why question her experience, if you sent a lesser experienced person to the same position? You guys are merely showing your partisanship. Why not just admit what is true?

I see the point you're making. And I must say, I see the point Harry Rex is making as well. I respect Harry because his advice is sage and his observations on law and life are a welcomed relief from the clamor and din of the liberal demands for self satisfaction in a land heretofore known for it's citizen's willingness to provide necessary personal sacrifice. Paul, a Republican, ran for the Senate and won as is often the case in Kentucky. All I'm saying is that it seems extremely unlikely that the voting paradigm for this state has changed in any significant fashion since the election of recent past. The Dems are all too well aware of this, and had hoped to pull off an end run by putting a home grown and glamorous movie star up against the incumbent Senate Minority Leader. He's a problem for them and they want him out. That didn't pan out and their fall back stand-in, is anything but glamorous or experienced. Mitch will win.

At any rate, it would seem the voter in Kentucky knew what was best for our state as Paul has acquitted himself well during his performance as Senator.

[Harry Rex Vonner]

This democrat pays taxes a plenty, and don't cry about it like you guys. My investments have done very well for the last 4 years. With record stock market numbers for quite awhile now, your investments should be doing equally as well. If not, you need a new financial guy.

If you pay "plenty" of income taxes you are surely in the minority among Democrat voters. In fact, if you pay any income taxes whatsoever, you are in the minority among your ilk.

[Harry Rex Vonner]

Dodging why you sent Paul? I understand. You know as well as me that he had zero political experience, yet you sent him. If she has not a lot of experience, and that is what you say over and over about her, why did you send an inexperienced Paul? Are you a hypocrite, or not? I listed her accomplishments. If you think they are from high school, prove it. You especially should know about the burden of proof.

Dodging? You can't be serious. Paul had his own medical practice for a number of years prior to running for office. That means that he, among many other accomplishments, rendered highly skilled services, actually made payrolls (I assume even union people understand what that means), provided jobs, supervised employees, and interacted with professionals on a professional basis. Of course, he also was raised in a family dedicated to public service since his father was a longtime congressman from Texas.

Now, just what has Little Lundergan done. Of course she did grow up in a family headed by her criminal father. She did graduate from LexCath and claims to be a good Catholic. On the other hand, not that it matters to you, she has deserted the basic tenets of her church to fall in line with the doctrines of the Democrat Party. She is, shall we say, a Pelosi Catholic. I believe you are tagging the wrong person as a hypocrite. But, then, from your use of the word, I don' think you are familiar with its meaning. However, you sure are a typical Democrat.

[TheRealVille]

Dodging? You can't be serious. Paul had his own medical practice for a number of years prior to running for office. That means that he, among many other accomplishments, rendered highly skilled services, actually made payrolls (I assume even union people understand what that means), provided jobs, supervised employees, and interacted with professionals on a professional basis. Of course, he also was raised in a family dedicated to public service since his father was a longtime congressman from Texas.

Now, just what has Little Lundergan done. Of course she did grow up in a family headed by her criminal father. She did graduate from LexCath and claims to be a good Catholic. On the other hand, not that it matters to you, she has deserted the basic tenets of her church to fall in line with the doctrines of the Democrat Party. She is, shall we say, a Pelosi Catholic. I believe you are tagging the wrong person as a hypocrite. But, then, from your use of the word, I don' think you are familiar with its meaning. However, you sure are a typical Democrat.

I'm pretty sure "turned over on appeal" means non criminal. You know that, of course.

[Harry Rex Vonner]

I'm pretty sure "turned over on appeal" means non criminal. You know that, of course.

Is that the best you can do? I feel like I am corresponding with a intellectual midget who has been brainwashed by liberals, Democrats, and union bosses. I know very well what "overturned on appeal" (not "turned over on appeal"- we aren't talking about an omelet) means but I am confident that you do not. How about "reversed and remanded"? How does that grab you? How about the class of crime known as a "misdemeanor"? Have you heard that one before?

Jerry's conviction was overturned on a technicality. The appeals court, made up of a nice majority of Democrats, ruled that his crime was a misdemeanor and not a felony. He was not retried which should surprise no one. The court of appeals did not exonerate him (that means they didn't find him not guilty of a crime). Thus, in the world of politics and public perception, your boy, Jerry, is a criminal.

And we still have not located Andy Lundergan. I am confident that he is not working late. Has he disappeared? Since apparently no one has really ever seen him, how would we know if he has met with foul play or if he is just being kept locked in a closet.

[TheRealVille]

Is that the best you can do? I feel like I am corresponding with a intellectual midget who has been brainwashed by liberals, Democrats, and union bosses. I know very well what "overturned on appeal" (not "turned over on appeal"- we aren't talking about an omelet) means but I am confident that you do not. How about "reversed and remanded"? How does that grab you? How about the class of crime known as a "misdemeanor"? Have you heard that one before?

Jerry's conviction was overturned on a technicality. The appeals court, made up of a nice majority of Democrats, ruled that his crime was a misdemeanor and not a felony. He was not retried which should surprise no one. The court of appeals did not exonerate him (that means they didn't find him not guilty of a crime). Thus, in the world of politics and public perception, your boy, Jerry, is a criminal.

And we still have not located Andy Lundergan. I am confident that he is not working late. Has he disappeared? Since apparently no one has really ever seen him, how would we know if he has met with foul play or if he is just being kept locked in a closet.

All of which means he isn't a criminal, as you state. His conviction was turned over, or overturned, whatever you want to call it. His felony conviction was thrown out. It was thrown out because they charged him for a felony, on something that should have been charged as a misdemeanor. By the time it was overturned, the misdemeanor charge time had ran out. Whatever you might want to say, he isn't a criminal. Court records say as such. His record is spotless, as far as those charges go.

[Harry Rex Vonner]

All of which means he isn't a criminal, as you state. His conviction was turned over, or overturned, whatever you want to call it. His felony conviction was thrown out. It was thrown out because they charged him for a felony, on something that should have been charged as a misdemeanor. By the time it was overturned, the misdemeanor charge time had ran out. Whatever you might want to say, he isn't a criminal. Court records say as such. His record is spotless, as far as those charges go.

"Spotless record" and "Jerry Lundergan" are not two references that should appear in the same paragraph. And, I really don't expect you to understand legal language any more than I understand all that union lingo.

I just saw an ad of Little Lundergan's on television. She exhorts about her "volunteer" work in "domestic violence" cases. You are obviously impressed. But, then, you don't know how the legal system works. The truth is that she didn't volunteer for anything. Her law firm, like mine and like all others, are expected to do a certain amount of pro bono work. That means free work. When that comes up, as it often does, the gophers of the law firm are the ones assigned to do this free work since, to be honest, they have little else to do and aren't experienced enough to do anything of a material nature, Little Lundergan, as I posted before, was a gopher. Her own ad proves it. Now, there is nothing wrong with being a gopher. All of us in the profession were gophers at one time or the other. The point about Little Lundergan is that she wasn't a "practicing" associate long enough to graduate to the next stage. Thus, her "experience" as an attorney was as a gopher assisting in gopher matters. In your world, I guess we could call her an apprentice.

[RunItUpTheGut]

Is that the best you can do? I feel like I am corresponding with a intellectual midget who has been brainwashed by liberals, Democrats, and union bosses. I know very well what "overturned on appeal" (not "turned over on appeal"- we aren't talking about an omelet) means but I am confident that you do not. How about "reversed and remanded"? How does that grab you? How about the class of crime known as a "misdemeanor"? Have you heard that one before?

Jerry's conviction was overturned on a technicality. The appeals court, made up of a nice majority of Democrats, ruled that his crime was a misdemeanor and not a felony. He was not retried which should surprise no one. The court of appeals did not exonerate him (that means they didn't find him not guilty of a crime). Thus, in the world of politics and public perception, your boy, Jerry, is a criminal.

And we still have not located Andy Lundergan. I am confident that he is not working late. Has he disappeared? Since apparently no one has really ever seen him, how would we know if he has met with foul play or if he is just being kept locked in a closet.

nicker:

Intellectual Midget is a good one. Im sure even TRV got a laugh out of that one. You guys and your shenanigans.

[Harry Rex Vonner]

I was watching one of TheRealVille's boys, Steve Kornacki, on MSNBC this morning. He had a Democrat "expert" on election trends as a guest. This Democrat expert said that the chances of McConnell winning are well over 90%. That is odd information coming from a Democrat on Obama's network. He also said that it is difficult for the media to question Little Lundergan because she has no record whatsoever to examine. Such truth from MSNBC is extraordinary.

And, I'm still issuing an alert for the whereabouts of Andy Lundergan. Has he met with foul play? Has he been placed in witness protection? Is he embarrassed because he obviously doesn't wear the pants in the family? In any case, he has become completely invisible.

[TheRealVille]

^ Is he running for office? We don't see much of Ms. Chow, either.