[DortonWildcat5]

I don't like to compare scores, but Seneca beats KCC by 50 and SV struggles to beat KCC by 3.

Maybe SV isn't as good and one of the elites like some of the posters hype them up to be? I realize I'm going to have 10 different posters saying I'm bashing them, but if SV played teams like Trinity, Seneca, Ballard, Male, Jeffersontown, Eastern, Holmes, or Scott Co, you'd see why some of us outside of that area don't think they're as good as some of you hype them up to be.

I think SV should be ranked in the 10-15 range. That is appropriate IMO.

You have to love comparisons in sports. They rarely make any sense. Here's another comparison: KCC beat McCreary by 7, who beat Male, who beat Eastern, who lost to Seneca by 8. Based on that, KCC and Seneca are very close in talent yet Seneca beats KCC by 52. There are plenty of other comparisons that could be made around the state that make no sense either.

Well, throw that theory out the window when ranking teams. That's why they play the games!