[crazytaxidriver]

Just. So everything is clear and before I start to give opinions, I just want to say that I have 14 years of exp. at the professional level. I have called every kind of offensive and defensive play you can imagine. I live in prestonsburg now but I used to live in pikeville.

As a uk fan I must say that not only do we honestly care about what happened in 94 we also care about all history dating back to the days of good ole bear Bryant. That's why we all go to the tenn games and stuff. That way when we win we cam jump for joy and say we haven't done that in 45 years. It's exciting when it happens but not something to be overly proud of.

In uk's defense it is my opinion that the sec is the toughest conference from top to bottom. But I say that knowing that there are teams from other conferences that have better teams than some of the sec teams. Than god for recruiting right???

Now taking all my professional exp into consideration I'm going to talk about uk and Clemson. It is my opinion that ky and Clemson are more evenly matched than all us crazy fans realize. I just think ky's defense might be a notch better. Both offenses rely heavy on a select few from what I've seen. Cobb for ky and spiller for Clemson. Two really good players.

Even though I think uk's d is better, I'm not. Sure it's better than clemsons offense. If spiller gets turned loose then it's going to be bad for uk. But if spiller can be stopped then it could go the other way. Same thing with ky. Just flip it

I hate having a discussion while typing on my phone cause I can't reall type as fast as I think. So I'm going to leave it at that and come back shortly.