Poll: Would you make the deal?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
82.14%
No
17.86%
* You voted for this item.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Chad Johnson for Brian Urlacher (in talks)
#7
No. I heard that Brian Urlacher is having back problems, but he's a big reason why their defense is great. This trade doesn't make sense because it would make Chicago's defense worse and you don't really have a great quarterback to pass to Chad Johnson (Look at the Panthers, they have Steve Smith, a great receiver, but their quarterback is having problems). As a result, they don't pass it very much, which lowers Steve Smith's value. Chicago is a running team. If you trade Brian Urlacher, trade him for a better quarterback.

As for the Bengals, this would be a great trade. Houshmandzadeh would be a great receiver to replace Johnson, and Brian Urlacher would make your defense better (Yet, there defense would still be pretty bad). This would be a great team which would be a wild card contender. (They probably wouldn't win their division against the Pittsburgh Steelers, the Cleveland Browns, or the Baltimore Ravens.
Messages In This Thread
Chad Johnson for Brian Urlacher (in talks) - by Deathstar 80 - 01-01-2009, 04:09 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)