Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Trump tax plan exempts 93 million from income taxes
#6
(10-25-2024, 09:56 AM)SEKYFAN Wrote:
(10-25-2024, 12:13 AM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(10-24-2024, 11:09 PM)Ring'Em Up Wrote:
(10-24-2024, 10:50 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(10-24-2024, 02:28 PM)Maga Nuts Wrote: You could ask Hoot he would probably know
Trump is not going to impose 60% tariffs on anybody. China can't afford to call his bluff and the tariff would be negotiated to a lower number or China would agree to open some factories up in this country. That is how negotiations work. Kamal has no economic plan, or at least none that she can explain, but then she has difficulty understanding and explaining anything. Are you kin to her, vector?
Clueless on the subject, as usual.  
Hope that worn, faux-leather chair you downgraded to from the water-cooled one, came from WalMart, the world's biggest China importer.  They can stand to pay 20-40-60% tariffs and only raise prices 4-6 % and consumers say nothing but "the price of milk is so high."
Give credit where credit is due. Inflation soared on Harris-Biden's watch. The economy boomed under Trump's economic policies before the pandemic struck. Not all voters have forgotten how strong the economy was during those years. Black unemployment plummeted, which is probably why Trump's suport among black Americans is surging.

Do none of you lefties watch Kamala's interviews? She is clueless on all subjects, regardless of whether the interviewer is tough, or tossing her softball questions. Did any of you watch her trainwreck Townhall meeting on CNN last night? I get the feeling that you all decided how you were voting on the day you registered as Democrats and see no need to read beyond the headlines on MSNBC.

Listen to yourself, or maybe quit listening to one sided views on talk radio/TV and diversify yourself a little.  Listening to the pundits on only one side of the political spectrum will obviously keep you narrow minded. 

You state that Trump should get a Mulligan for the Pandemic, but Biden doesn't.  Also, Trump inherited a very strong economy, which you could say he squandered away in the second half of his term and Biden inherited a weak one, which he was able to turnaround in the second half of his.  It all depends on how you want to look at it.   You can't have it both ways. 
I am pretty sure, based on the posts that the liberals make in this forum, that my news sources are far more diverse than yours. I watched both the CNN Townhall and the Fox interview of Harris by Bret Baier. Anybody who actually watches Kamala's word salad responses to easy interview questions could not, in good conscience, pretend that she is a strong candidate. Your assumption that I listen to talk radio or "talk TV" on a regular basis, is not true, and your statement just shows how you stereotype conservatives. During this campaign, much of my information is coming from Youtube channels and watching videos of the two candidates' speeches. Short of personally attending the speeches, that is as close to first hand information that one can get.

As for the COVID pandemic, Trump was president during the peak of the pandemic. Black American unemployment reached record lows during his presidency. Because so many businesses were shutdown and people prevented from leaving home much, it was inevitable that there would be a strong economic rebound as the pandemic subsided. The record inflation spike was not inevitable. Biden and Harris deserve most of the blame for that, and the rate has still not returned to its pre-pandemic level.
Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)