[know1]

Boyle won almost every statistical category. Even punting. And they were penalized more. The better team clearly won, but the margin between the two wasn't much. Corbin was a very, very good team. I still don't think coaching was the difference at all. Boyle had a handful of the best players on the field who took over the game. And a lot of their big plays and big gains were broken plays or scrambles. And Haddix made some very questionable choices at times. Coaching really wasn't the big difference.

You're a tater sack blower upper. lol. I'm not a Corbin fan, but I have common sense and can see who has the superior coach.

Then how about giving specific examples of how the superior coaching of Boyle won that game?

Don't play dumb. Study the film. It's not hard to see. If talent won the game, I'm sure you wouldn't mind trading coaches with Corbin? lol

So you don't have an answer or any example. That's what I figured.