[vector#1]

I saw the discourse between the two. Paul owned Fauci, who was literally shaking in his boots. As Hoot so correctly pointed out and you so predictably ignored, The Washington Post published an article validating the fact that Rand Paul was right and Fauci was wrong. Further, it is not often that we see a witness on Capital Hill lose it to the extent that Fauci lost it.

Just to be clear... this is Wa Po we're talking about here. Not FOX News. Your post is ludicrous.

So now you guys believe what the Washington Post writes.....

This is another case of there being no requirement to form an opinion based on somebody else's opinion, yet there are the four of you steadfastly defending a scoundrel with blood on his hands. Fauci left a paper trail and thanks to FOIA releases to Judicial Watch, Washington Post, Buzzfeed, and other organizations, you can read with your own eyes who Fauci has corresponded with and what was said. Fauci is a blatant liar but don't take anybody else's word for that, read some of the relevant email messages yourself. It is idiotic to defend somebody when the evidence of his guilt is there for the taking.

Quooter it's your King who has blood on his hands he was president in 2020. He was in charge in 2020. He stood up their every day gave his press conference saying everything is all right until he thought it was going to hurt his reelection then he went to  campaigning. It's not that complicated he was the one in charge not Dr. Fauci and he was fired for the way he mishandled the Trump Flu,