[mr.fundamental]

Gee thanks, I see your own progress appears to be somewhat lacking though. To wit, your propensity for dredging up an errant premise, the bolded^^, and on that false foundation you then proceed to build observations which do not apply. Don't wish my family well out of one side of your mouth and accuse me of the duplicity of supporting both sexual predation and the sanctity of life out the other.

NOBODY has come on here to say "his actions are good," because they don't know what the heck those actions may have actually been. Nor has anybody defended the Judge. What they've done is extend him the assumption of innocence until proof of guilt is presented. You on the other hand and several others have taken a stance that prejudges Moore as being guilty until proven innocent. Principle and liberty are thusly stood on their heads in our time, as you so aptly demonstrate. We were once a nation of laws, that appears to be a thing of the past.

Do you seriously not realize or understand that YOU DON'T KNOW whether the charges levied against Judge Moore are legitimate or if they are lies? If the US Senate rolls over on Moore (and McConnell certainly already has) without any proof other than this sort of playground slur, any candidate such as Roy Moore or any currently serving member is a target. At that point all that would have to be done assumedly, is for Dems to find somewhere between 1 to 10 women who're willing to come out and make the allege. They've got them crawling out of the woodwork now accusing George H W Bush of inappropriate sexual advances. The same H. W. BTW, who's been out of office for very nearly 4 decades.

Now, how interesting do you find all of that?

First off never accused anyone of anything, asking for clarification though is legit.

What is your position on this situation?

My position is that it is sad as I have said earlier that it some folks think it is ok because the mother consented to letting her 14 daughter be with a 30 year old man, that does not make it moral. It might be legal, but not moral.
Second, to further the point, I want to know if it is true that Roy Moore was not allowed back into a mall in Alabama? If he was not why?

That is my position.

So as others have asked, again I say what is your position on this matter?