[The Urban Sombrero]

^^ Consider this. The Democrats are despite the double-double down, on the ropes. So, what are their options and what has been their modus-operandi?

For evidentiary purposes, and though one could compile a book sized volume of examples, there is no need to go back any further than the Romney/Obama campaign to demonstrate the point. In that election season even though there were many examples of collusion, DNC debate tampering, and vote manipulation, most of what the media chose to elaborate on were the efforts of character assassination against Romney.

In the past election the Democrats used billions of "the people's" tax dollars to send legions of investigators and lawyers out to dig up stuff on DJT. But because as it turned out, he was only mildly possessed of any sort of character flaws, the best they could do was the a locker-room boy talk tape. So came the false charges of Russia collusion which spawned 21 long months of so-called investigations, which in reality are mere extensions of Obama's original efforts to discredit another political foe.

In summation, the Dems lie, cheat, and allege character flaws against all the foes they face. The two nuclear go-to's for the DNC slime machine are sexual slander, or bigotry of the racial or gender variety. Now, if they (the Dems) are brave enough to attack a sitting President with this stuff, surely we are not kidding ourselves in the case of Judge Roy Moore?

How many women was it again who came out at the last second to accuse DJT of sexual aggression? 10 at last count that I know of. How many came out at just he right moment to accuse Herman Cain? Dems know people have a tendency to believe such allegations on their face, so they will continue to go back to the well until the tactic stops working IMHO. But in view of the recent past, is anybody other than me skeptical at all about all these charges of sexual misconduct against Judge Roy Moore?

I'll tell you who doesn't know a thing about it. Anybody reading this post for starters, but past that Mitch McConnell, John McCain, Bob Corker, Mike Lee, or any of the other 13 senators who've come forward to slam him publicly. It could all be the stuff of brazen political attack, and I think people should wait, be it vigilantly if they choose, for real evidence. I mean, they've certainly been patient to that end where the past administrative big wigs are involved. If I didn't know better I'd think the soap opera and the real world have traded places.

Again and again, BOTH the RNC and DNC do the single most predictable thing in politics: pull out nearly every stop to WIN. It would not occur to me to defend Anthony Weiner. I hope the man finds some redemption and peace, but he should not be in Congress. I said, in all caps, “IF” on Roy Moore, though it seems fairly likely that the young-then prosecutor (early 30’s) sought out teenage girls. Again “IF” any of those “seeking outs” included sexual assault of any kind, Roy Moore does not belong in Congress. Now, let us all remember the released audio of then candidate Trump overtly stating that wealth (and one assumes power) make it possible for a man to just walk right up and grab a woman’s genitalia, and they don’t mind. That sounds like an unlikely universal. It also sounds like a man whose philosophical underpinnings regarding sexuality make some sort of sexual assault not particularly unlikely. Under the “why now” objection, one need look no further than current news: men and women voicing up about being victimized. The roots of sexual misconduct and perversion are long, historical, and common, made worse by Puritanical values and shrouding.
What we have on this thread is pure verification of tribalism, plain and simple.