[Patriot1]

Haha. Now that I can understand. I never thought you were being hostile, hope you didn’t think I was either. I just think you interpreted what I was saying wrong or took away the wrong things out of it in a different direction and context it was meant for. As far as your reply, I agree with you about coaching up players and getting everything out of them you can, it makes a great coach. But sadly, in today’s world, wins are what most view as an objectively good coach, I know it’s more than that. But 20 yrs down the road people won’t remember the coach (outside of the immediate fan base) who won 7 or 8 games with nothing, but they’ll remember the coach who went 15-0. I do however disagree with you on the comparing of teams. I think you have to in order to have a “measuring stick” of where and what you are. I hate to say it but the past couple of years belfry has been that measuring stick. That was part of the point of my OP. And, how Corbin has done compared to the team they played next. So if Haddix isn’t a good coach then centrals, Lex Cath’s, etc. isn’t either because they have had the same results or worse. You almost have to base or compare your teams to other teams. In most cases a coach is based on those results as well. It’s somewhat why the game is played, comparing your team to the other and see who wins. You can try to form an opinion on a team without outside factors (other teams, results) but it is almost unfeasible to do so without being subjective. But, as I said, I see what you’re saying and I agree with a lot of it, it just wasn’t what I was trying to relay in my OP. And once again, I didn’t take anything you said as hostile, just misinterpreted. Also, thanks for the period haha😆

Thanks, I haven’t been doing this long as you can see by how many posts I have. Just love to talk football and I never said Haddix wasn’t a good coach he probably is. I don’t post on teams I don’t know about just things that I like and sometimes don’t agree with but you seem very knowledgeable about Corbin.