[TheRealThing]

So, HG, you never knew in school a person born male who seemed feminine, or born female who seemed male? Now, your "there are two genders" is correct; however, were not hormone levels subject to the Fall, just as cells and tissue and organs?

Genesis 1:26-28 (KJV)
26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.



You argue like Satan, though you haven't quite got the knack IMO. From the lame constitutional arguments you make, to the heretical scriptural arguments, you like Satan try to make your clever presentations. Only problem is those who know the truth are not fooled. God created man in HIS own image, and I guarantee you that God The Father, nor The Lord Jesus, nor The Holy Spirit are confused. Not about the gender of any one of those They have created, and certainly not Their own.

Therefore when every man is called to face his judgment, he will pay the penalty for making the choice to seem to be of the opposite sex.

1 Corinthians 6:9 (KJV)
9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,


Now, by way of capsulated dissertation; those who are 'effeminate' would be those of your mention, those men who seem to be feminine be that in school or wherever. While those who abuse themselves with mankind, are those men who work with other men, that which is unseemly. And in sympathy for any who read this, and who may know somebody who is gay, I am sorry for them. But that does not change what God has said about it.

Then you (Sombrero) try to justify homosexuality by alleging that the whole notion of homosexuality is completely subjective, and therefore outside of man's control owing to raging post 'fall' hormones. I mean, I've heard of fuzzy math, but in this case we're getting a dose of 'Sombrero blender,' fuzzy theology mixed with fuzzy science. The new field of thought, I guess, would be fuzzitheologicience. Despite this kind of nonsense, to be homosexual means men choose to be homosexual. And because it is their choice, God says He will judge them for same. But you go ahead and lie to them, allay their burning consciences with Sombrero theologicience. Tell them it's not their fault and God will overlook their choice to violate His law. The book of Romans was written long after the fall, and after the appearance of Christ on this earth. If He'd any tweeks to make He would have done so.

I on the other hand state categorically, though homosexuals who turn from their wicked ways and repent before God can still be saved, those who do not will be judged. End of argument.