Thousands of people of opposite opinion walking in close proximity. One side holding the opinion that America is inherently evil, the other side believing America is a force for good in this world.
My fear. At some point just laughing at the other side or glaring at each other from a distance, will give way to violence. Such bouts of unthinkable violence could get way worse than just 'ugly' in a very short span of time, and on a NATIONAL level not just Charlottesville or potentially Boston. Nonetheless we have BGR court jesters on here talking about peaceful protest were there has been zero peaceful protest. And that incredibly, in spite of the fact that even the 'lame stream' media have been airing the proof.
⬆
Court jester? It's Bob that wears the cap, dear confused little peacock.
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:⬆
Court jester? It's Bob that wears the cap, dear confused little peacock.
The guilty dog always barks.
I hope I'm there to see it if you ever do actually run into Bob somewhere. I won't even have to ask who you are. 5' 8ish, 220 pounds (due in part to the advanced estrogen treatments) and sweaty palms would be my guess.
TheRealThing Wrote:The guilty dog always barks.
I hope I'm there to see it if you ever do actually run into Bob somewhere. I won't even have to ask who you are. 5' 8ish, 220 pounds (due in part to the advanced estrogen treatments) and sweaty palms would be my guess.
Ah, PeeWeeGee, it doesn't seem to sink in with you that any and all references to cyber bullying just aren't applicable here. I would welcome a face-to-face discussion with Bob. In fact, throw him in on the Pine Mountain Grill wager. Speaking of estrogen, how many chicken nuggets have you scarfed down?
Nah, trust me, you wouldn't want to meet me. I don't think you would enjoy it.
Bob Seger Wrote:Nah, trust me, you wouldn't want to meet me. I don't think you would enjoy it.
I'm quite sure I would. Why, you are a pleasant fellow. Will you be wearing a cap? "Trust me"... lol
And now we see why the zealots just love the pissing contest king. Pathetic.
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:Ah, PeeWeeGee, it doesn't seem to sink in with you that any and all references to cyber bullying just aren't applicable here. I would welcome a face-to-face discussion with Bob. In fact, throw him in on the Pine Mountain Grill wager. Speaking of estrogen, how many chicken nuggets have you scarfed down?
Don't eat garbage and don't swim in the septic tank, but I guarantee you're the BGR estrogen queen.
TheRealThing Wrote:Don't eat garbage and don't swim in the septic tank, but I guarantee you're the BGR estrogen queen.
Or so you wish. You amuse me, TRWee. Actually, I appreciate your good-natured causticisms. What fun we have here on BGR.
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:Or so you wish. You amuse me, TRWee. Actually, I appreciate your good-natured causticisms. What fun we have here on BGR.
Oh yeah, I especially had great fun reading the post in which outlined Thomas Jefferson's starring role at the Constitutional Convention, which he did not attend.
inglepar
Care to share more of your vast knowledge and spiritual insight regarding the Founders there Sombrero?
TheRealThing Wrote:Oh yeah, I especially had great fun reading the post in which outlined Thomas Jefferson's starring role at the Constitutional Convention, which he did not attend. inglepar
Care to share more of your vast knowledge and spiritual insight regarding the Founders there Sombrero?
Are you suggesting, TRT, that the ideas, concepts, writings of Thomas Jefferson were not prevalent? Again, literal mindedness, especially when being a Forum Boy, is no strength. Look at the preamble in terms of the Declaration of Independence. You think so far in the box that you miss the forest for the trees. You seek to characterize Jefferson's physical absence (He was in Paris) as if his intellectual tour de force was not paramount.
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:Are you suggesting, TRT, that the ideas, concepts, writings of Thomas Jefferson were not prevalent? Again, literal mindedness, especially when being a Forum Boy, is no strength. Look at the preamble in terms of the Declaration of Independence. You think so far in the box that you miss the forest for the trees. You seek to characterize Jefferson's physical absence (He was in Paris) as if his intellectual tour de force was not paramount.
Oh no, I'm not suggesting that. I'm saying straight up that despite your come on, you never know what in the heck you're talking about. And I'm saying now that you have been so inescapably 'outed,' that you will try to duck dodge dive lie slime or distort your way out of it, in a vain effort to rehabilitate something that never existed outside of that shrunken cabeza of yours in the first place. :Thumbs:
⬆
Thomas Jefferson was the most compelling, forceful influence at the Constitutional Convention. Period. Forum Boys. That's all you are. Plain. Simple. Forum Boys.
^Ignorance is the easiest diagnosed affliction in modern society. At the same time, it is the most under treated and most easily cured human condition. Vector and his sidekick, The Mexican Sombrero are prime examples of what happens to those who suffer from ignorance but reject readily available treatment.
Hoot Gibson Wrote:^Ignorance is the easiest diagnosed affliction in modern society. At the same time, it is the most under treated and most easily cured human condition. Vector and his sidekick, The Mexican Sombrero are prime examples of what happens to those who suffer from ignorance but reject readily available treatment.
And Hoyt Goobson is what happens when a man spends, oh, what, six months denigrating a candidate in the most plain, derogatory manner, then pivots and makes him a demigod. Speaking of suffering, I'm glad to see you and fellow zealot PeeWeeGee cozy again. It was painful to see you two just hammer each other day after day after day. Congrats on the reconciliation.
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:And Hoyt Goobson is what happens when a man spends, oh, what, six months denigrating a candidate in the most plain, derogatory manner, then pivots and makes him a demigod. Speaking of suffering, I'm glad to see you and fellow zealot PeeWeeGee cozy again. It was painful to see you two just hammer each other day after day after day. Congrats on the reconciliation.
:biglmao: You are such a useless fool for the left. (I don't think Stalin or Lenin would have placed you in the useful idiot class.)
Hoot Gibson Wrote::biglmao: You are such a useless fool for the left.
⬆
And you are infected with Peacockian forgetfulness, which makes you just such a perfect tail-grasper, Hoyt Goobson.
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:And you are infected with Peacockian forgetfulness, which makes you just such a perfect tail-grasper, Hoyt Goobson.
Just how old are you? You can't actually be an adult. An adult of sound mind would have too much pride to type the gibberish that you do.
Hoot Gibson Wrote:Just how old are you? You can't actually be an adult. An adult of sound mind would have too much pride to type the gibberish that you do.
Old enough to recognize a guy whose principles are a zealot's checklist. An adult of sound mind, or so he claims, TRASHED Donald Trump for MONTHS before anointing him as a demigod.
I think Hoot and TRT can become enlightened, just like I did, by opening there minds.
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:Old enough to recognize a guy whose principles are a zealot's checklist.
More gibberish, as expected. I have posted more substantive criticism of Trump than anybody who is active in this forum, and I have continued to do so since he took office. While you have been actively rooting for this nation's enemies and praying for Trump's impeachment, I have supported his actions that mesh with my political beliefs and criticized him in areas such as some very poor hiring choices.
You obviously have little contact with reality, as you demonstrate by branding everybody who disagrees with you in any area a "zealot," while few poster are as politically aligned with the far left wing of the Democratic Party as you are. In technical terms, you are a minion - an unimportant follower of left wing politicians and failed socialist programs.
Do you know any smart liberals who you could recruit to speak on your behalf? I only ask because you offer no intellectual challenge.
WideRight05 Wrote:I think Hoot and TRT can become enlightened, just like I did, by opening there minds.
I think you need your head examined. Maybe you, vector, and Mexican Hat could get a volume discount.
nicker:
Hoot Gibson Wrote:More gibberish, as expected. I have posted more substantive criticism of Trump than anybody who is active in this forum, and I have continued to do so since he took office. While you have been actively rooting for this nation's enemies and praying for Trump's impeachment, I have supported his actions that mesh with my political beliefs and criticized him in areas such as some very poor hiring choices.
You obviously have little contact with reality, as you demonstrate by branding everybody who disagrees with you in any area a "zealot," while few poster are as politically aligned with the far left wing of the Democratic Party as you are. In technical terms, you are a minion - an unimportant follower of left wing politicians and failed socialist programs.
Do you know any smart liberals who you could recruit to speak on your behalf? I only ask because you offer no intellectual challenge.
I am a smart liberal and am happy to stand up for Sombrero. Why should we take someone serious who believes that bathrooms should be segregated between male and female?
WideRight05 Wrote:I am a smart liberal and am happy to stand up for Sombrero. Why should we take someone serious who believes that bathrooms should be segregated between male and female?
With few exceptions, "smart liberal" is an oxymoron. I have always liked you, WR, but you are no Alan Dershowitz, when it comes to defending liberal policies.
Hoot Gibson Wrote:More gibberish, as expected. I have posted more substantive criticism of Trump than anybody who is active in this forum, and I have continued to do so since he took office. While you have been actively rooting for this nation's enemies and praying for Trump's impeachment, I have supported his actions that mesh with my political beliefs and criticized him in areas such as some very poor hiring choices.
You obviously have little contact with reality, as you demonstrate by branding everybody who disagrees with you in any area a "zealot," while few poster are as politically aligned with the far left wing of the Democratic Party as you are. In technical terms, you are a minion - an unimportant follower of left wing politicians and failed socialist programs.
Do you know any smart liberals who you could recruit to speak on your behalf? I only ask because you offer no intellectual challenge.
Ah, Peacockian poppycock
Note: I have NOT called for Donald Trump's impeachment UNLESS certain facts are established in the Special Counsel's report.
Note: you, Hoyt, absolutely TRASHED Donald Trump, labeled him unfit, uncouth, unchristian, to but name a few. Then, he becomes President, fires the FBI Director, establishes himself as the tweeting don, and you disappear into a zealot's magic box. So, do you know any consistent conservatives, ones that don't label a guy unfit, then, months later "warm" to him? That's rich, Hoyt, rich.
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:Ah, Peacockian poppycock
Note: I have NOT called for Donald Trump's impeachment UNLESS certain facts are established in the Special Counsel's report.
Note: you, Hoyt, absolutely TRASHED Donald Trump, labeled him unfit, uncouth, unchristian, to but name a few. Then, he becomes President, fires the FBI Director, establishes himself as the tweeting don, and you disappear into a zealot's magic box. So, do you know any consistent conservatives, ones that don't label a guy unfit, then, months later "warm" to him? That's rich, Hoyt, rich.
I believe Donald has already committed impeachable offenses
Obstruction trying to get Comey to stop the investigation on Flynn
Conclusion his son and son in law plus his campaign manager meeting with the Russians to get dirt in Hillarry can you just imagine the republicans if this was a democrat who done this I mean we impeached a president for a bl0wj0b
vector Wrote:I believe Donald has already committed impeachable offenses
Obstruction trying to get Comey to stop the investigation on Flynn
Conclusion his son and son in law plus his campaign manager meeting with the Russians to get dirt in Hillarry can you just imagine the republicans if this was a democrat who done this I mean we impeached a president for a bl0wj0b
Clinton was impeached for committing perjury in the presence of a federal judge, but don't let the facts get in the way of your spewing hatred of your own country.
Hoot Gibson Wrote:With few exceptions, "smart liberal" is an oxymoron. I have always liked you, WR, but you are no Alan Dershowitz, when it comes to defending liberal policies.
You need to open your mind. I'm not the one that believes men and women should be segregated in the restrooms.
No one, so far, has been able to defend themselves against me or Sombrero.
WideRight05 Wrote:You need to open your mind. I'm not the one that believes men and women should be segregated in the restrooms.
No one, so far, has been able to defend themselves against me or Sombrero.
Men and women should not be segregated "
in the restrooms." They should not be sharing the restrooms period. As for defending ourselves, when one is right, no defense is required in a battle of ideas.
Hoot Gibson Wrote:With few exceptions, "smart liberal" is an oxymoron. I have always liked you, WR, but you are no Alan Dershowitz, when it comes to defending liberal policies.
Hoot Gibson Wrote:Men and women should not be segregated "in the restrooms." They should not be sharing the restrooms period. As for defending ourselves, when one is right, no defense is required in a battle of ideas.
But that's the same as water fountains essentially. It's segregation. What's so wrong about all 31 genders sharing the restroom together?
If we don't see people come around on their own, hopefully states will pass ordinances requiring businesses to have gender neutral bathrooms.
WideRight05 Wrote:But that's the same as water fountains essentially. It's segregation. What's so wrong about all 31 genders sharing the restroom together?
If we don't see people come around on their own, hopefully states will pass ordinances requiring businesses to have gender neutral bathrooms.
When scientists prove the existence of 31 genders through DNA testing, then I will recognize their existence. Until then, I recognize only three - he, she, and it - with the latter being reserved for those who reject their God-given, biological gender.