Thread Rating:
03-07-2017, 08:08 PM
FROM THE CBO---
“CBO and JCT can no longer determine exactly how the provisions of the ACA that are not related to the expansion of health insurance coverage have affected their projections of direct spending and revenues,” the CBO wrote. “The provisions that expanded coverage established entirely new programs or components of programs that can be isolated and reassessed. Isolating the incremental effects of those provisions on previously existing programs and revenues four years after enactment of the ACP is not possible.”
FROM THE AUTHOR, ERIC PIANIN---
The CBO’s acknowledgment that there is no longer a credible method for gauging the long term budgetary effects of the huge and complex program for extending health coverage to millions of Americans could become fodder for renewed Republican attacks during the mid-term congressional election campaign.
FROM BILL HOAGLAND---
“From purely an analyst’s perspective, I don’t think I would consider this terribly exciting,” Bill Hoagland, a senior vice president at the Bipartisan Policy Center and a former Senate Republican budget expert, said in an interview Wednesday. “But politically, I think it’s dynamite.”
http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2...ut-Deficit
FROM SOMBRERO---
Democrat talking points straight off the DNC website.
“CBO and JCT can no longer determine exactly how the provisions of the ACA that are not related to the expansion of health insurance coverage have affected their projections of direct spending and revenues,” the CBO wrote. “The provisions that expanded coverage established entirely new programs or components of programs that can be isolated and reassessed. Isolating the incremental effects of those provisions on previously existing programs and revenues four years after enactment of the ACP is not possible.”
FROM THE AUTHOR, ERIC PIANIN---
The CBO’s acknowledgment that there is no longer a credible method for gauging the long term budgetary effects of the huge and complex program for extending health coverage to millions of Americans could become fodder for renewed Republican attacks during the mid-term congressional election campaign.
FROM BILL HOAGLAND---
“From purely an analyst’s perspective, I don’t think I would consider this terribly exciting,” Bill Hoagland, a senior vice president at the Bipartisan Policy Center and a former Senate Republican budget expert, said in an interview Wednesday. “But politically, I think it’s dynamite.”
http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2...ut-Deficit
FROM SOMBRERO---
Democrat talking points straight off the DNC website.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Messages In This Thread
ObamaCare - by TheRealThing - 03-07-2017, 06:20 PM
ObamaCare - by The Urban Sombrero - 03-07-2017, 07:53 PM
ObamaCare - by TheRealThing - 03-07-2017, 08:08 PM
ObamaCare - by The Urban Sombrero - 03-07-2017, 09:47 PM
ObamaCare - by The Urban Sombrero - 03-07-2017, 09:52 PM
ObamaCare - by TheRealThing - 03-07-2017, 10:30 PM
ObamaCare - by The Urban Sombrero - 03-08-2017, 06:04 AM
ObamaCare - by TheRealThing - 03-08-2017, 02:32 PM
ObamaCare - by mr.fundamental - 03-08-2017, 06:26 PM
ObamaCare - by The Urban Sombrero - 03-08-2017, 08:03 PM
ObamaCare - by Hoot Gibson - 03-08-2017, 11:34 PM
ObamaCare - by TheRealThing - 03-08-2017, 11:36 PM
ObamaCare - by TheRealThing - 03-09-2017, 12:04 AM
ObamaCare - by Hoot Gibson - 03-09-2017, 12:17 AM
ObamaCare - by TheRealThing - 03-09-2017, 01:45 AM
ObamaCare - by Hoot Gibson - 03-09-2017, 02:04 AM
ObamaCare - by RunItUpTheGut - 03-09-2017, 02:52 AM
ObamaCare - by TheRealThing - 03-09-2017, 03:42 AM
ObamaCare - by mr.fundamental - 03-09-2017, 06:47 PM
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)