[skully03]

Queation fo those who watched the ball game. Obviously turnovers affected Belfry, Lawrence County cashed in on some of the opportunities, but missed on others, missing two field goals (i believe) that would have won the game had they connected. But my question is this. With no turnovers, how does this game play out? If Lawrence cashes in on each turnover its a MASSIVE upset of a scoring margin in favor of LC I would assume. I ask from a Raceland fan's perspective in comparing a few scores (though now days thats nearly a wash due to matchup situations).

1. Paintsville beats Pikeville in over time on the shoulders of Kash Daniel.
2. Belfry thumps Pikeville in Pond Creek.
3. Raceland defeats LC on the road thanks to Bailey Walker ripping the ball out of Mosely's hands, in a game that after watching several times I though Belfry would beat either of the two about like they did Pikeville.
4. The Bulldogs take the Pirates down to the wire.

Without the fumbles, does Belfry put a running clock on LC? One could argue that if only HALF the turnovers turned into scoring drives, Belfry wins by 3-5 TDs. Just looking for some opinions from both the Dawgpound and PondCreek faithful.

If belfry would not have fumbled like they did, the game would prob have been lopsided by halftime. Not a knock on LC by any means. They did a heck of a job stripping the ball when our players got stood up. But without fumbles belfry would have prob sustained some longer drives wearing down LC that much more. So yeah without fumbles the game is not as close. But if a frog had wings........... You know the rest.