[TheRealThing]

The question was brought up about her experience. When questioning someone's experience for the senators job, you have to compare who you guys were willing to send, that had less experience. Why question her experience, if you sent a lesser experienced person to the same position? You guys are merely showing your partisanship. Why not just admit what is true?

I see the point you're making. And I must say, I see the point Harry Rex is making as well. I respect Harry because his advice is sage and his observations on law and life are a welcomed relief from the clamor and din of the liberal demands for self satisfaction in a land heretofore known for it's citizen's willingness to provide necessary personal sacrifice. Paul, a Republican, ran for the Senate and won as is often the case in Kentucky. All I'm saying is that it seems extremely unlikely that the voting paradigm for this state has changed in any significant fashion since the election of recent past. The Dems are all too well aware of this, and had hoped to pull off an end run by putting a home grown and glamorous movie star up against the incumbent Senate Minority Leader. He's a problem for them and they want him out. That didn't pan out and their fall back stand-in, is anything but glamorous or experienced. Mitch will win.

At any rate, it would seem the voter in Kentucky knew what was best for our state as Paul has acquitted himself well during his performance as Senator.