[vundy33]

Hmmm, 14 to's vs. 12 assists in the last 3 games prior to today
equals non-existent tunrnovers. Looks like you must study at
the feet of the Clueless Moderator Dusty.

But in any event, as I said, he's not making them against
tough D, just being careless. Andhe held the to's against pressure
to a minimum today and U of L wasn't shooting layups
off them, so all's well. It WOULD be nice to see Teague
ACTUALLY make the to's almost "non-existent" since
that wold go along way toward getting this team into
some offensive sync.

I was thinking about earlier games, the streak he went on with hardly any turnovers that you fail to acknowledge. He is a Freshman, it happens with every single Frosh PG. You're acting like Wall and Knight didn't make turnovers against crappy teams, when they did, alot. Through the first 8 games of the season (pretty sure it was 8 when I seen the stat), Teague had less turnovers than both Knight and Wall at the same point in their Freshman years.

It's tough to compare him to Wall or Knight in hardly anything though, because he's not the offensive star that they HAD to be..he just doesn't have to be that guy. It's hilarious how you won't even acknowledge when our PG actually does play good and go 4 or 5 games with minimal turnovers, and then you sit and criticize from your computer chair. Does nothing satisfy you?

He's not John Wall and he's not Brandon Knight. Two completely different styles of players, therefore two totally different learning curves. Get over it, he's playing good enough for us to win without putting a great amount of pressure on his teammates, and that's the point. If you want to criticize the kid when he does bad, then you should at least give him credit when he does well.