[easyM]

My "yes" nod was just answering his question. I never said KC should be above JC. JC beat us on a neutral field. They should be above us, no other way around it, unless we had beat someone that had beat them. Which didnt and wont happen, unless were lucky enough to make it back to log mountain and come out with a win.

Good post. My only point was, the previous poster felt as if Knox should have been ranked over JC because they played in a smaller class and played very well against JC. I agree with that totally, but head to head JC won so they should be ranked above Knox, especially with comparable records.