[The Outsider]

https://currently.att.yahoo.com/att/cm/t...48636.html

Former President Donald Trump turned up the heat in his growing feud with the Republican National Committee on Monday night with an email urging his supporters to give their money to him and not the party or other candidates.

On Monday, The Washington Post reported that the RNC had decided to move a portion of its April retreat to Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. Trump will speak and the committee will pay him and his resort for the event.

That type of self-serving arrangement had become somewhat standard the Trump era, with his properties collecting some $10.5 million from various political and campaign funds. But now, it seems increasingly clear he wants the money flowing directly to him ― and not to the party.

[Old School Hound]

https://currently.att.yahoo.com/att/cm/t...48636.html

Former President Donald Trump turned up the heat in his growing feud with the Republican National Committee on Monday night with an email urging his supporters to give their money to him and not the party or other candidates.

On Monday, The Washington Post reported that the RNC had decided to move a portion of its April retreat to Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. Trump will speak and the committee will pay him and his resort for the event.

That type of self-serving arrangement had become somewhat standard the Trump era, with his properties collecting some $10.5 million from various political and campaign funds. But now, it seems increasingly clear he wants the money flowing directly to him ― and not to the party.

Par for the course...   (NPI)

[vector#1]

https://currently.att.yahoo.com/att/cm/t...48636.html

Former President Donald Trump turned up the heat in his growing feud with the Republican National Committee on Monday night with an email urging his supporters to give their money to him and not the party or other candidates.

On Monday, The Washington Post reported that the RNC had decided to move a portion of its April retreat to Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. Trump will speak and the committee will pay him and his resort for the event.

That type of self-serving arrangement had become somewhat standard the Trump era, with his properties collecting some $10.5 million from various political and campaign funds. But now, it seems increasingly clear he wants the money flowing directly to him ― and not to the party.

Par for the course...   (NPI)

If the people are that dam stupid i say knock yourself out

[Old School Hound]

https://currently.att.yahoo.com/att/cm/t...48636.html

Former President Donald Trump turned up the heat in his growing feud with the Republican National Committee on Monday night with an email urging his supporters to give their money to him and not the party or other candidates.

On Monday, The Washington Post reported that the RNC had decided to move a portion of its April retreat to Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. Trump will speak and the committee will pay him and his resort for the event.

That type of self-serving arrangement had become somewhat standard the Trump era, with his properties collecting some $10.5 million from various political and campaign funds. But now, it seems increasingly clear he wants the money flowing directly to him ― and not to the party.

Par for the course...   (NPI)

If the people are that dam stupid i say knock yourself out

And people are that damned stupid.   That's why "Pastor" Kenneth Copeland is worth more than 750 million dollars.

[Hoot Gibson]

Yes, people are stupid.

Trump is a private citizen who is in the hotel/resort business. There is no reason for him to turn business away from the RNC or any other group that wants to book a reservation. Would you prefer that he busy himself pocketing millions of dollars in bribes from the Chinese Communist Party? 

I don't blame Trump for holding a grudge against the establishment Republicans. I am a bit surprised that he is allowing them to set foot on his company's property, but he needs to focus on keeping his companies afloat in the face of the onslaught of liberal attacks on them.

[vector#1]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...d=msedgdhp

[Hoot Gibson]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...d=msedgdhp

As quickly as possible.   As quickly as possible would have been October 2020 when Trump wanted to cut larger checks. Pelosi refused because she thought sending checks would help Trump's campaign.

[vector#1]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...d=msedgdhp

As quickly as possible.   As quickly as possible would have been October 2020 when Trump wanted to cut larger checks. Pelosi refused because she thought sending checks would help Trump's campaign.

Don't forget about Mitch he definitely wasn't going to cut no $2,000 checks
But Nancy did sign off on the first checks don't forget about that

[Hoot Gibson]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...d=msedgdhp

As quickly as possible.   As quickly as possible would have been October 2020 when Trump wanted to cut larger checks. Pelosi refused because she thought sending checks would help Trump's campaign.

Don't forget about Mitch he definitely wasn't going to cut no $2,000 checks
But Nancy did sign off on the first checks don't forget about that

The bill never reached McConnell. Pelosi stalled the bill because of the election. She could not care less about people suffering and delayed the checks and cut the amount that Trump was willing to approve. The main purpose of these big spending bills is to fund Democrat slush funds. Trump offered to sign a bill that gave more people who were actually impacted by the pandemic but did not include billions of dollars of unrelated spending. Illegal aliens will get more money than many American citizens will receive.

Is there any scumbag Democrat that you are not willing to defend?   I don't think so.

[vector#1]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...d=msedgdhp

As quickly as possible.   As quickly as possible would have been October 2020 when Trump wanted to cut larger checks. Pelosi refused because she thought sending checks would help Trump's campaign.

Don't forget about Mitch he definitely wasn't going to cut no $2,000 checks
But Nancy did sign off on the first checks don't forget about that

The bill never reached McConnell. Pelosi stalled the bill because of the election. She could not care less about people suffering and delayed the checks and cut the amount that Trump was willing to approve. The main purpose of these big spending bills is to fund Democrat slush funds. Trump offered to sign a bill that gave more people who were actually impacted by the pandemic but did not include billions of dollars of unrelated spending. Illegal aliens will get more money than many American citizens will receive.

Is there any scumbag Democrat that you are not willing to defend?   I don't think so.

I see you side stepped the first bill Nancy put on Trump's desk i guess you agree that hurt his election
Mitch was NOT going to give Dear Leader $2,000
Democrat slush funds don't see that
Illegal aliens was in first 2 bills you didn't complain then what's changed

[Hoot Gibson]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...d=msedgdhp

As quickly as possible.   As quickly as possible would have been October 2020 when Trump wanted to cut larger checks. Pelosi refused because she thought sending checks would help Trump's campaign.

Don't forget about Mitch he definitely wasn't going to cut no $2,000 checks
But Nancy did sign off on the first checks don't forget about that

The bill never reached McConnell. Pelosi stalled the bill because of the election. She could not care less about people suffering and delayed the checks and cut the amount that Trump was willing to approve. The main purpose of these big spending bills is to fund Democrat slush funds. Trump offered to sign a bill that gave more people who were actually impacted by the pandemic but did not include billions of dollars of unrelated spending. Illegal aliens will get more money than many American citizens will receive.

Is there any scumbag Democrat that you are not willing to defend?   I don't think so.

I see you side stepped the first bill Nancy put on Trump's desk i guess you agree that hurt his election
Mitch was NOT going to give Dear Leader $2,000
Democrat slush funds don't see that
Illegal aliens was in first 2 bills you didn't complain then what's changed

It is impossible to have an honest debate with a liar. Trump offered to sign a clean bill that was stripped of all of the non-related garbage that Pelosi insisted on including. Democrats wanted to bail out states like New York, whose governors inflicted damage on their own economies by forcing businesses and schools to close for long periods. All Pelosi had to do was accept Trump's offer and the checks would have been cut in October. McConnell might not have liked it, but the votes were there to pass the bill through the Senate.

[vector#1]

As quickly as possible.   As quickly as possible would have been October 2020 when Trump wanted to cut larger checks. Pelosi refused because she thought sending checks would help Trump's campaign.

Don't forget about Mitch he definitely wasn't going to cut no $2,000 checks
But Nancy did sign off on the first checks don't forget about that

The bill never reached McConnell. Pelosi stalled the bill because of the election. She could not care less about people suffering and delayed the checks and cut the amount that Trump was willing to approve. The main purpose of these big spending bills is to fund Democrat slush funds. Trump offered to sign a bill that gave more people who were actually impacted by the pandemic but did not include billions of dollars of unrelated spending. Illegal aliens will get more money than many American citizens will receive.

Is there any scumbag Democrat that you are not willing to defend?   I don't think so.

I see you side stepped the first bill Nancy put on Trump's desk i guess you agree that hurt his election
Mitch was NOT going to give Dear Leader $2,000
Democrat slush funds don't see that
Illegal aliens was in first 2 bills you didn't complain then what's changed

It is impossible to have an honest debate with a liar. Trump offered to sign a clean bill that was stripped of all of the non-related garbage that Pelosi insisted on including. Democrats wanted to bail out states like New York, whose governors inflicted damage on their own economies by forcing businesses and schools to close for long periods. All Pelosi had to do was accept Trump's offer and the checks would have been cut in October. McConnell might not have liked it, but the votes were there to pass the bill through the Senate.

And once again you have side stepped the first bill Nancy put on the Dear Leader's desk 
Mitch was not going to give away $2,000 
Did Illegal's get money in first 2 bills and if they did what has changed ?
Slush fund's you sure you talking about the first bill or the third bill which one
When you are in the majority you get to put on the floor what you want who said that ?
If Nancy wanted to hurt Dear Leader like you have accused her then why did she passed the first bill you have to agree that helped Dear Leader in fact he held the checks up so he could put his signature on them
Come on man you can do better than that

[The Outsider]

Trump only wanted to do the $2000 check because he thought that it would help him in the election. It was common knowledge, at least to those who had any common sense, that the Senate would have never passed it.

[Hoot Gibson]

Trump only wanted to do the $2000 check because he thought that it would help him in the election.  It was common knowledge, at least to those who had any common sense, that the Senate would have never passed it.

Trump said yes. Pelosi said no. That is the bottom line. If Pelosi had been certain that it would not have passed the Senate, then it would have made Trump and the Republicans look very weak going into the election. There is no reason to believe that a clean bill would not have passed.

[The Outsider]

Trump only wanted to do the $2000 check because he thought that it would help him in the election.  It was common knowledge, at least to those who had any common sense, that the Senate would have never passed it.

Trump said yes. Pelosi said no. That is the bottom line. If Pelosi had been certain that it would not have passed the Senate, then it would have made Trump and the Republicans look very weak going into the election. There is no reason to believe that a clean bill would not have passed.

There may be 20% of the country who actually believe that.  I guess you are part of that faction.

[Hoot Gibson]

Trump only wanted to do the $2000 check because he thought that it would help him in the election.  It was common knowledge, at least to those who had any common sense, that the Senate would have never passed it.

Trump said yes. Pelosi said no. That is the bottom line. If Pelosi had been certain that it would not have passed the Senate, then it would have made Trump and the Republicans look very weak going into the election. There is no reason to believe that a clean bill would not have passed.

There may be 20% of the country who actually believe that.  I guess you are part of that faction.

Trump said yes. Pelosi said no. Everything else is speculation on your part. I don't see any gray area there at all. Pelosi never gave McConnell a chance to shoot down Trump's proposal. Those are all facts. Speculate all you want but it won't change the facts.

[vector#1]

Trump only wanted to do the $2000 check because he thought that it would help him in the election.  It was common knowledge, at least to those who had any common sense, that the Senate would have never passed it.

Trump said yes. Pelosi said no. That is the bottom line. If Pelosi had been certain that it would not have passed the Senate, then it would have made Trump and the Republicans look very weak going into the election. There is no reason to believe that a clean bill would not have passed.

There may be 20% of the country who actually believe that.  I guess you are part of that faction.

Trump said yes. Pelosi said no. Everything else is speculation on your part. I don't see any gray area there at all. Pelosi never gave McConnell a chance to shoot down Trump's proposal. Those are all facts. Speculate all you want but it won't change the facts.

Quooter once again you are dodging the first stimulus bill Nancy put on Dear Leader's desk the one he put his signature on the checks and if you got the money direct deposit he sent a letter at a cost of millions to people talk about a slush fund
If illegals got checks in the first and second what's changed about the 3rd stimulus bill
Nancy passed her 2nd bill in may Dear Leader and Mitch dragged there feet waiting right before election to try to do anything
But NO Mitch was not going to give away $2,000 NO WAY

[Hoot Gibson]

Trump only wanted to do the $2000 check because he thought that it would help him in the election.  It was common knowledge, at least to those who had any common sense, that the Senate would have never passed it.

Trump said yes. Pelosi said no. That is the bottom line. If Pelosi had been certain that it would not have passed the Senate, then it would have made Trump and the Republicans look very weak going into the election. There is no reason to believe that a clean bill would not have passed.

There may be 20% of the country who actually believe that.  I guess you are part of that faction.

Trump said yes. Pelosi said no. Everything else is speculation on your part. I don't see any gray area there at all. Pelosi never gave McConnell a chance to shoot down Trump's proposal. Those are all facts. Speculate all you want but it won't change the facts.

Quooter once again you are dodging the first stimulus bill Nancy put on Dear Leader's desk the one he put his signature on the checks and if you got the money direct deposit he sent a letter at a cost of millions to people talk about a slush fund
If illegals got checks in the first and second what's changed about the 3rd stimulus bill
Nancy passed her 2nd bill in may Dear Leader and Mitch dragged there feet waiting right before election to try to do anything
But NO Mitch was not going to give away $2,000 NO WAY

You do not write well. Obviously, you do not read well either.

[vector#1]

Trump said yes. Pelosi said no. That is the bottom line. If Pelosi had been certain that it would not have passed the Senate, then it would have made Trump and the Republicans look very weak going into the election. There is no reason to believe that a clean bill would not have passed.

There may be 20% of the country who actually believe that.  I guess you are part of that faction.

Trump said yes. Pelosi said no. Everything else is speculation on your part. I don't see any gray area there at all. Pelosi never gave McConnell a chance to shoot down Trump's proposal. Those are all facts. Speculate all you want but it won't change the facts.

Quooter once again you are dodging the first stimulus bill Nancy put on Dear Leader's desk the one he put his signature on the checks and if you got the money direct deposit he sent a letter at a cost of millions to people talk about a slush fund
If illegals got checks in the first and second what's changed about the 3rd stimulus bill
Nancy passed her 2nd bill in may Dear Leader and Mitch dragged there feet waiting right before election to try to do anything
But NO Mitch was not going to give away $2,000 NO WAY

You do not write well. Obviously, you do not read well either.

And once again Quooter you are dodging the FACTS
Quooter i know you are on the ropes when you complain about some ones spelling or in this case writing that's a new one from you
Just how much more did it cost the taxpayers for Dear Leader to send out a separate letter ?

[Hoot Gibson]

There may be 20% of the country who actually believe that.  I guess you are part of that faction.

Trump said yes. Pelosi said no. Everything else is speculation on your part. I don't see any gray area there at all. Pelosi never gave McConnell a chance to shoot down Trump's proposal. Those are all facts. Speculate all you want but it won't change the facts.

Quooter once again you are dodging the first stimulus bill Nancy put on Dear Leader's desk the one he put his signature on the checks and if you got the money direct deposit he sent a letter at a cost of millions to people talk about a slush fund
If illegals got checks in the first and second what's changed about the 3rd stimulus bill
Nancy passed her 2nd bill in may Dear Leader and Mitch dragged there feet waiting right before election to try to do anything
But NO Mitch was not going to give away $2,000 NO WAY

You do not write well. Obviously, you do not read well either.

And once again Quooter you are dodging the FACTS
Quooter i know you are on the ropes when you complain about some ones spelling or in this case writing that's a new one from you
Just how much more did it cost the taxpayers for Dear Leader to send out a separate letter ?

i dodged nothing. I create my own posts and they contain my own opinions. You do not have to like them. As far as extra costs, the so-called stimulus bill contains a mountain of wasteful spending, such as the $650 million bail out of San Francisco, which happens to be represented in Congress by Nancy Pelosi. I don't really think that you want to compare the waste in Pelosi's bill to wasteful spending that Trump caused. That spending legislation is full of line item expenses that even most liberal voters would oppose if they bothered to learn what was in the legislation. Democrats always demand unrelated pork barrel spending when they believe that they can damage Republicans by blocking a bill. They do not care how many people went hungry or lost their homes and businesses because of Pelosi's delay.

The only reason that any stimulus spending was necessary is that blue state governors, as well as the RINO governor of Maryland, forced business and school closures. Had they fought the pandemic like DeSantis and Noem did, the economy would not have collapsed.

[vector#1]

Trump said yes. Pelosi said no. Everything else is speculation on your part. I don't see any gray area there at all. Pelosi never gave McConnell a chance to shoot down Trump's proposal. Those are all facts. Speculate all you want but it won't change the facts.

Quooter once again you are dodging the first stimulus bill Nancy put on Dear Leader's desk the one he put his signature on the checks and if you got the money direct deposit he sent a letter at a cost of millions to people talk about a slush fund
If illegals got checks in the first and second what's changed about the 3rd stimulus bill
Nancy passed her 2nd bill in may Dear Leader and Mitch dragged there feet waiting right before election to try to do anything
But NO Mitch was not going to give away $2,000 NO WAY

You do not write well. Obviously, you do not read well either.

And once again Quooter you are dodging the FACTS
Quooter i know you are on the ropes when you complain about some ones spelling or in this case writing that's a new one from you
Just how much more did it cost the taxpayers for Dear Leader to send out a separate letter ?

i dodged nothing. I create my own posts and they contain my own opinions. You do not have to like them. As far as extra costs, the so-called stimulus bill contains a mountain of wasteful spending, such as the $650 million bail out of San Francisco, which happens to be represented in Congress by Nancy Pelosi. I don't really think that you want to compare the waste in Pelosi's bill to wasteful spending that Trump caused. That spending legislation is full of line item expenses that even most liberal voters would oppose if they bothered to learn what was in the legislation. Democrats always demand unrelated pork barrel spending when they believe that they can damage Republicans by blocking a bill. They do not care how many people went hungry or lost their homes and businesses because of Pelosi's delay.

The only reason that any stimulus spending was necessary is that blue state governors, as well as the RINO governor of Maryland, forced business and school closures. Had they fought the pandemic like DeSantis and Noem did, the economy would not have collapsed.

Your Dear Leader added 8 Trillion to the debt in 4 years and the final tally has yet to be counted
But it shouldn't be no surprise he did say he was King of Debt
And YES Quooter you still dodged the first stimulus bill Nancy put on Dear Leader's desk
And about the illegal's getting a check if they got them in the first 2 what has got your panties in a wad about the third check
Quooter you also dodge the separate letter the Dear Leader send out to millions i bet that cost a lot i bet your framed yours hung it right on the wall
Don't know nothing about your so called bail outs

[Hoot Gibson]

Quooter once again you are dodging the first stimulus bill Nancy put on Dear Leader's desk the one he put his signature on the checks and if you got the money direct deposit he sent a letter at a cost of millions to people talk about a slush fund
If illegals got checks in the first and second what's changed about the 3rd stimulus bill
Nancy passed her 2nd bill in may Dear Leader and Mitch dragged there feet waiting right before election to try to do anything
But NO Mitch was not going to give away $2,000 NO WAY

You do not write well. Obviously, you do not read well either.

And once again Quooter you are dodging the FACTS
Quooter i know you are on the ropes when you complain about some ones spelling or in this case writing that's a new one from you
Just how much more did it cost the taxpayers for Dear Leader to send out a separate letter ?

i dodged nothing. I create my own posts and they contain my own opinions. You do not have to like them. As far as extra costs, the so-called stimulus bill contains a mountain of wasteful spending, such as the $650 million bail out of San Francisco, which happens to be represented in Congress by Nancy Pelosi. I don't really think that you want to compare the waste in Pelosi's bill to wasteful spending that Trump caused. That spending legislation is full of line item expenses that even most liberal voters would oppose if they bothered to learn what was in the legislation. Democrats always demand unrelated pork barrel spending when they believe that they can damage Republicans by blocking a bill. They do not care how many people went hungry or lost their homes and businesses because of Pelosi's delay.

The only reason that any stimulus spending was necessary is that blue state governors, as well as the RINO governor of Maryland, forced business and school closures. Had they fought the pandemic like DeSantis and Noem did, the economy would not have collapsed.

Your Dear Leader added 8 Trillion to the debt in 4 years and the final tally has yet to be counted
But it shouldn't be no surprise he did say he was King of Debt
And YES Quooter you still dodged the first stimulus bill Nancy put on Dear Leader's desk
And about the illegal's getting a check if they got them in the first 2 what has got your panties in a wad about the third check
Quooter you also dodge the separate letter the Dear Leader send out to millions i bet that cost a lot i bet your framed yours hung it right on the wall
Don't know nothing about your so called bail outs

You don't know much about anything but the bail outs are not mine. They were gifts from Nancy Pelosi from American taxpayers. Don't worry, working people will pay to bail out San Francisco, so it's not skin off of your nose.

[vector#1]

You do not write well. Obviously, you do not read well either.

And once again Quooter you are dodging the FACTS
Quooter i know you are on the ropes when you complain about some ones spelling or in this case writing that's a new one from you
Just how much more did it cost the taxpayers for Dear Leader to send out a separate letter ?

i dodged nothing. I create my own posts and they contain my own opinions. You do not have to like them. As far as extra costs, the so-called stimulus bill contains a mountain of wasteful spending, such as the $650 million bail out of San Francisco, which happens to be represented in Congress by Nancy Pelosi. I don't really think that you want to compare the waste in Pelosi's bill to wasteful spending that Trump caused. That spending legislation is full of line item expenses that even most liberal voters would oppose if they bothered to learn what was in the legislation. Democrats always demand unrelated pork barrel spending when they believe that they can damage Republicans by blocking a bill. They do not care how many people went hungry or lost their homes and businesses because of Pelosi's delay.

The only reason that any stimulus spending was necessary is that blue state governors, as well as the RINO governor of Maryland, forced business and school closures. Had they fought the pandemic like DeSantis and Noem did, the economy would not have collapsed.

Your Dear Leader added 8 Trillion to the debt in 4 years and the final tally has yet to be counted
But it shouldn't be no surprise he did say he was King of Debt
And YES Quooter you still dodged the first stimulus bill Nancy put on Dear Leader's desk
And about the illegal's getting a check if they got them in the first 2 what has got your panties in a wad about the third check
Quooter you also dodge the separate letter the Dear Leader send out to millions i bet that cost a lot i bet your framed yours hung it right on the wall
Don't know nothing about your so called bail outs

You don't know much about anything but the bail outs are not mine. They were gifts from Nancy Pelosi from American taxpayers. Don't worry, working people will pay to bail out San Francisco, so it's not skin off of your nose.

And once again Quooter dodging the questions about Nancy giving Dear Leader what he wanted in first stimulus 

And about the illegal's getting a check if they got them in the first 2 what has got your panties in a wad about the third check
Quooter you also dodge the separate letter the Dear Leader send out to millions i bet that cost a lot i bet your framed yours hung it right on the wall
Don't know nothing about your so called bail outs
You must have taken early retirement also 

[Hoot Gibson]

And once again Quooter you are dodging the FACTS
Quooter i know you are on the ropes when you complain about some ones spelling or in this case writing that's a new one from you
Just how much more did it cost the taxpayers for Dear Leader to send out a separate letter ?

i dodged nothing. I create my own posts and they contain my own opinions. You do not have to like them. As far as extra costs, the so-called stimulus bill contains a mountain of wasteful spending, such as the $650 million bail out of San Francisco, which happens to be represented in Congress by Nancy Pelosi. I don't really think that you want to compare the waste in Pelosi's bill to wasteful spending that Trump caused. That spending legislation is full of line item expenses that even most liberal voters would oppose if they bothered to learn what was in the legislation. Democrats always demand unrelated pork barrel spending when they believe that they can damage Republicans by blocking a bill. They do not care how many people went hungry or lost their homes and businesses because of Pelosi's delay.

The only reason that any stimulus spending was necessary is that blue state governors, as well as the RINO governor of Maryland, forced business and school closures. Had they fought the pandemic like DeSantis and Noem did, the economy would not have collapsed.

Your Dear Leader added 8 Trillion to the debt in 4 years and the final tally has yet to be counted
But it shouldn't be no surprise he did say he was King of Debt
And YES Quooter you still dodged the first stimulus bill Nancy put on Dear Leader's desk
And about the illegal's getting a check if they got them in the first 2 what has got your panties in a wad about the third check
Quooter you also dodge the separate letter the Dear Leader send out to millions i bet that cost a lot i bet your framed yours hung it right on the wall
Don't know nothing about your so called bail outs

You don't know much about anything but the bail outs are not mine. They were gifts from Nancy Pelosi from American taxpayers. Don't worry, working people will pay to bail out San Francisco, so it's not skin off of your nose.

And once again Quooter dodging the questions about Nancy giving Dear Leader what he wanted in first stimulus 

And about the illegal's getting a check if they got them in the first 2 what has got your panties in a wad about the third check
Quooter you also dodge the separate letter the Dear Leader send out to millions i bet that cost a lot i bet your framed yours hung it right on the wall
Don't know nothing about your so called bail outs
You must have taken early retirement also 

Why are you worried about politics at all? As long as you can walk to the mailbox and get your check, you have achieved your lifetime goal. Keep voting Democrat. Nancy will make sure you are fed.

[vector#1]

i dodged nothing. I create my own posts and they contain my own opinions. You do not have to like them. As far as extra costs, the so-called stimulus bill contains a mountain of wasteful spending, such as the $650 million bail out of San Francisco, which happens to be represented in Congress by Nancy Pelosi. I don't really think that you want to compare the waste in Pelosi's bill to wasteful spending that Trump caused. That spending legislation is full of line item expenses that even most liberal voters would oppose if they bothered to learn what was in the legislation. Democrats always demand unrelated pork barrel spending when they believe that they can damage Republicans by blocking a bill. They do not care how many people went hungry or lost their homes and businesses because of Pelosi's delay.

The only reason that any stimulus spending was necessary is that blue state governors, as well as the RINO governor of Maryland, forced business and school closures. Had they fought the pandemic like DeSantis and Noem did, the economy would not have collapsed.

Your Dear Leader added 8 Trillion to the debt in 4 years and the final tally has yet to be counted
But it shouldn't be no surprise he did say he was King of Debt
And YES Quooter you still dodged the first stimulus bill Nancy put on Dear Leader's desk
And about the illegal's getting a check if they got them in the first 2 what has got your panties in a wad about the third check
Quooter you also dodge the separate letter the Dear Leader send out to millions i bet that cost a lot i bet your framed yours hung it right on the wall
Don't know nothing about your so called bail outs

You don't know much about anything but the bail outs are not mine. They were gifts from Nancy Pelosi from American taxpayers. Don't worry, working people will pay to bail out San Francisco, so it's not skin off of your nose.

And once again Quooter dodging the questions about Nancy giving Dear Leader what he wanted in first stimulus 

And about the illegal's getting a check if they got them in the first 2 what has got your panties in a wad about the third check
Quooter you also dodge the separate letter the Dear Leader send out to millions i bet that cost a lot i bet your framed yours hung it right on the wall
Don't know nothing about your so called bail outs
You must have taken early retirement also 

Why are you worried about politics at all? As long as you can walk to the mailbox and get your check, you have achieved your lifetime goal. Keep voting Democrat. Nancy will make sure you are fed.

And once again Quooter Duck Dodge and Spin

[Cardfan1]

This thread is a prime example of what happens when you parrot Ted Cruz.

[vector#1]

We have finally got us a real Attorney General

---

https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/us-b...r-5-months
Another big mess the Dear Leader has left us

[Hoot Gibson]

We have finally got us a real Attorney General

---

https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/us-b...r-5-months
Another big mess the Dear Leader has left us

You guys are really too much. You support all of the stimulus spending, including all of the non-pandemic related pork that Pelosi demanded as part of the deal and not the deficit is all Trump's fault. It makes no sense but it is par for the course for you two. I would call you frauds but that would be too strong an insult for mere fraudsters.

[vector#1]

We have finally got us a real Attorney General

---

https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/us-b...r-5-months
Another big mess the Dear Leader has left us

You guys are really too much. You support all of the stimulus spending, including all of the non-pandemic related pork that Pelosi demanded as part of the deal and not the deficit is all Trump's fault. It makes no sense but it is par for the course for you two. I would call you frauds but that would be too strong an insult for mere fraudsters.

You supported the spending only when a republican is doing it

[Hoot Gibson]

We have finally got us a real Attorney General

---

https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/us-b...r-5-months
Another big mess the Dear Leader has left us

You guys are really too much. You support all of the stimulus spending, including all of the non-pandemic related pork that Pelosi demanded as part of the deal and not the deficit is all Trump's fault. It makes no sense but it is par for the course for you two. I would call you frauds but that would be too strong an insult for mere fraudsters.

You supported the spending only when a republican is doing it

Actually, I never supported any of the spending. I understand why it was probably a politically necessary thing for Trump to do, but none of the "stimulus" spending was justified then or now. The problem for Trump was big spenders like McConnell would probably have conspired with Democrats to impeach and convict him if he had not signed the spending bills.