[pitchfork]

Can u explain the difference please ^...wasn't allowed to rejoin, not kicked off----gimme a break.. The funniest thing is nothing happened to the parent or the coach who both acted much worse.

The parent, player, 2 asst, head coach, AD, and principle had a meeting and all apoligized and was water under the bridge. But head coach still would not reinstate the player. Pretty harsh after this player has paid his dues for RUSSELL. Has not missed 6 practices or conditioning since freshman yr. But he is just to small "What he is told by more than one coach". But it is OK for others to step out line and still be on the team. The right thing to do was to suspend him for 1 game and go on. The coach that they had words with wants him back in pads and his classmates all want back in pads.
But it is over for now "MAYBE". Water under the bridge and play ball.

[flavorflav]

The parent, player, 2 asst, head coach, AD, and principle had a meeting and all apoligized and was water under the bridge. But head coach still would not reinstate the player. Pretty harsh after this player has paid his dues for RUSSELL. Has not missed 6 practices or conditioning since freshman yr. But he is just to small "What he is told by more than one coach". But it is OK for others to step out line and still be on the team. The right thing to do was to suspend him for 1 game and go on. The coach that they had words with wants him back in pads and his classmates all want back in pads.
But it is over for now "MAYBE". Water under the bridge and play ball.

Much more to the story than that....the RIGHT thing for them to do was what the Head Coach decided