•  Previous
  • 1
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31(current)
  • 32
  • Next 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Stop the Steal
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/11/supreme-...suits.html

Trump election fraud campaign is like the Energizer Bunny...still losing.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurke...uguration/

Don’t give up the Kraken now!!!
(01-20-2021, 02:01 AM)Hoot Gibson Wrote: [Image: https://media.gab.com/system/media_attac...8a178a.jpg]
Probably 1 million 

5 million 

10 million people !!!

12 hours left
Another lose for the Dear Leader and his flock

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...d=msedgdhp
(02-22-2021, 12:27 PM)vector#1 Wrote: Another lose for the Dear Leader and his flock

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...d=msedgdhp
Woah

wait!!!  

Weren’t these the lead pipe locks @Hoot Gibson said were going to prove Democrats stole the election??!!

no way. No.  

Boys, we’ve been hoodwinked, bamboozled, hornswoogled, snookered, buffaloed....none of this was election fraud was real.
[-] The following 1 user Likes Cardfan1's post:
  • vector#1
(02-22-2021, 02:04 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 12:27 PM)vector#1 Wrote: Another lose for the Dear Leader and his flock

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...d=msedgdhp
Woah

wait!!!  

Weren’t these the lead pipe locks @Hoot Gibson said were going to prove Democrats stole the election??!!

no way. No.  

Boys, we’ve been hoodwinked, bamboozled, hornswoogled, snookered, buffaloed....none of this was election fraud was real.
Quooter has never been right
Whatever he or she say's just the opposite Wrong Way Quooter
[-] The following 1 user Likes vector#1's post:
  • Cardfan1
(02-22-2021, 02:04 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 12:27 PM)vector#1 Wrote: Another lose for the Dear Leader and his flock

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...d=msedgdhp
Woah

wait!!!  

Weren’t these the lead pipe locks @Hoot Gibson said were going to prove Democrats stole the election??!!

no way. No.  

Boys, we’ve been hoodwinked, bamboozled, hornswoogled, snookered, buffaloed....none of this was election fraud was real.

I'm sure the he will say that the Supreme Court is in on it as well.......
(02-22-2021, 04:25 PM)The Outsider Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 02:04 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 12:27 PM)vector#1 Wrote: Another lose for the Dear Leader and his flock

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...d=msedgdhp
Woah

wait!!!  

Weren’t these the lead pipe locks @Hoot Gibson said were going to prove Democrats stole the election??!!

no way. No.  

Boys, we’ve been hoodwinked, bamboozled, hornswoogled, snookered, buffaloed....none of this was election fraud was real.

I'm sure the he will say that the Supreme Court is in on it as well.......
You know he or she will that's how the Quooter's roll
Pretty fair to say I am no longer the “most prolific liar in BGR history.” Big Grin

This one fraud has pushed one of our members to the front and stripped me of most of my banners.
(02-22-2021, 04:42 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote: Pretty fair to say I am no longer the “most prolific liar in BGR history.”  Big Grin

This one fraud has pushed one of our members to the front and stripped me of most of my banners.
Quooter has always been in the front
(02-22-2021, 02:04 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 12:27 PM)vector#1 Wrote: Another lose for the Dear Leader and his flock

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...d=msedgdhp
Woah

wait!!!  

Weren’t these the lead pipe locks @Hoot Gibson said were going to prove Democrats stole the election??!!

no way. No.  

Boys, we’ve been hoodwinked, bamboozled, hornswoogled, snookered, buffaloed....none of this was election fraud was real.


You've done all the hornswoggling to yourself. There was never going to be a way to verify mail-in ballots in the best of situations. Towards the end, Dems were so cavalier about it they abandoned all form and/or fashion of even the appearance of trying to do things legally, and just did anything they darn well pleased. But ballots found in a duffel bag laying on a public bench, or harvested, or picked up by who knows who from makeshift cardboard drop boxes or 'gathered' by any unorthodox means and delivered in rusted out unmared vans with out of state tags and the fenders flapping, should not have been allowed. But as with every other point of contention between rabid libs and conservatives, even though there is established law on all these matters, where that law runs contrary to the interests of the left, it's simply ignored. On the other hand if the left wants to control conservatives they are sharp enough about the law to use it as a weapon against Republicans.

For anyone who wasn't happy to surf the kool-aid, the swing state 2am ballot drops and the hundreds of thousands of unfolded, unsigned, undated one check marked ballots for Biden only-- caused great concern about legitimacy even under the new moronic guidelines. Did I mention that in order for ballots to be considered valid they must be accompanied by the envelopes in which they were supposedly mailed? And that those envelopes were all summarily disposed of; all by actors unknown? That's illegal. Nonetheless though rational people would have known better, rather than having internet trolls the likes of you guys on here trying to argue down the right by virtue of 24/7 campaign using persistence your only weapon; had at least a few applicable forensic audits been performed. And had the courts accepted even a few cases to be heard, and not just taken the collaborative/coward's way out with the ridiculous finding that the people didn't have standing. If the audits were not revelatory, and if the cases were found to be based on vapor as is the unsupported claim, the left could have claimed victory and the right would have had to shut up about it. But no, it was a 100% stonewall.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
(02-23-2021, 11:40 AM)TheRealThing Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 02:04 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 12:27 PM)vector#1 Wrote: Another lose for the Dear Leader and his flock

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...d=msedgdhp
Woah

wait!!!  

Weren’t these the lead pipe locks @Hoot Gibson said were going to prove Democrats stole the election??!!

no way. No.  

Boys, we’ve been hoodwinked, bamboozled, hornswoogled, snookered, buffaloed....none of this was election fraud was real.


You've done all the hornswoggling to yourself. There was never going to be a way to verify mail-in ballots in the best of situations. Towards the end, Dems were so cavalier about it they abandoned all form and/or fashion of even the appearance of trying to do things legally, and just did anything they darn well pleased. But ballots found in a duffel bag laying on a public bench, or harvested, or picked up by who knows who from makeshift cardboard drop boxes or 'gathered' by any unorthodox means and delivered in rusted out unmared vans with out of state tags and the fenders flapping, should not have been allowed. But as with every other point of contention between rabid libs and conservatives, even though there is established law on all these matters, where that law runs contrary to the interests of the left, it's simply ignored. On the other hand if the left wants to control conservatives they are sharp enough about the law to use it as a weapon against Republicans.

For anyone who wasn't happy to surf the kool-aid, the swing state 2am ballot drops and the hundreds of thousands of unfolded, unsigned, undated one check marked ballots for Biden only-- caused great concern about legitimacy even under the new moronic guidelines. Did I mention that in order for ballots to be considered valid they must be accompanied by the envelopes in which they were supposedly mailed? And that those envelopes were all summarily disposed of; all by actors unknown? That's illegal. Nonetheless though rational people would have known better, rather than having internet trolls the likes of you guys on here trying to argue down the right by virtue of 24/7 campaign using persistence your only weapon;  had at least a few applicable forensic audits been performed. And had the courts accepted even a few cases to be heard, and not just taken the collaborative/coward's way out with the ridiculous finding that the people didn't have standing. If the audits were not revelatory, and if the cases were found to be based on vapor as is the unsupported claim, the left could have claimed victory and the right would have had to shut up about it. But no, it was a 100% stonewall.
Here we go again if you have or had ANY REAL EVIDENCE of voter fraud you should of gave it to your Dear Leader
Your Dear Leader lost by a overwhelming 7 million votes in the hills we call that a slaughter 
Need to quit spreading your lies and admit your Dear Leader Lost
(02-23-2021, 11:40 AM)TheRealThing Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 02:04 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 12:27 PM)vector#1 Wrote: Another lose for the Dear Leader and his flock

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...d=msedgdhp
Woah

wait!!!  

Weren’t these the lead pipe locks @Hoot Gibson said were going to prove Democrats stole the election??!!

no way. No.  

Boys, we’ve been hoodwinked, bamboozled, hornswoogled, snookered, buffaloed....none of this was election fraud was real.


You've done all the hornswoggling to yourself. There was never going to be a way to verify mail-in ballots in the best of situations. Towards the end, Dems were so cavalier about it they abandoned all form and/or fashion of even the appearance of trying to do things legally, and just did anything they darn well pleased. But ballots found in a duffel bag laying on a public bench, or harvested, or picked up by who knows who from makeshift cardboard drop boxes or 'gathered' by any unorthodox means and delivered in rusted out unmared vans with out of state tags and the fenders flapping, should not have been allowed. But as with every other point of contention between rabid libs and conservatives, even though there is established law on all these matters, where that law runs contrary to the interests of the left, it's simply ignored. On the other hand if the left wants to control conservatives they are sharp enough about the law to use it as a weapon against Republicans.

For anyone who wasn't happy to surf the kool-aid, the swing state 2am ballot drops and the hundreds of thousands of unfolded, unsigned, undated one check marked ballots for Biden only-- caused great concern about legitimacy even under the new moronic guidelines. Did I mention that in order for ballots to be considered valid they must be accompanied by the envelopes in which they were supposedly mailed? And that those envelopes were all summarily disposed of; all by actors unknown? That's illegal. Nonetheless though rational people would have known better, rather than having internet trolls the likes of you guys on here trying to argue down the right by virtue of 24/7 campaign using persistence your only weapon;  had at least a few applicable forensic audits been performed. And had the courts accepted even a few cases to be heard, and not just taken the collaborative/coward's way out with the ridiculous finding that the people didn't have standing. If the audits were not revelatory, and if the cases were found to be based on vapor as is the unsupported claim, the left could have claimed victory and the right would have had to shut up about it. But no, it was a 100% stonewall.
The dishonesty of the liberals who participate in this forum prevent them from examining any evidence that contradicts their party's position that there is no evidence of widespread election fraud. It doesn't matter how many videos exist or how many experts confirm that Dominion's voting machines flipped votes from Trump to Biden, as long as the Supreme Court refuses to even peek at the evidence that has been filed, liberals are going to behave like the happy mushrooms that they are. The thing is, no matter how accommodating the Supreme Court is to China Joe and the Democrat-controlled Congress is, they will likely pack the court anyway. Generations of Republican elected officials proved that compromising with Democrats is counterproductive. Like despots the world over the only thing Democrats respond to is the credible threat of the exercise of raw power.
(02-23-2021, 01:31 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 11:40 AM)TheRealThing Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 02:04 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 12:27 PM)vector#1 Wrote: Another lose for the Dear Leader and his flock

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...d=msedgdhp
Woah

wait!!!  

Weren’t these the lead pipe locks @Hoot Gibson said were going to prove Democrats stole the election??!!

no way. No.  

Boys, we’ve been hoodwinked, bamboozled, hornswoogled, snookered, buffaloed....none of this was election fraud was real.


You've done all the hornswoggling to yourself. There was never going to be a way to verify mail-in ballots in the best of situations. Towards the end, Dems were so cavalier about it they abandoned all form and/or fashion of even the appearance of trying to do things legally, and just did anything they darn well pleased. But ballots found in a duffel bag laying on a public bench, or harvested, or picked up by who knows who from makeshift cardboard drop boxes or 'gathered' by any unorthodox means and delivered in rusted out unmared vans with out of state tags and the fenders flapping, should not have been allowed. But as with every other point of contention between rabid libs and conservatives, even though there is established law on all these matters, where that law runs contrary to the interests of the left, it's simply ignored. On the other hand if the left wants to control conservatives they are sharp enough about the law to use it as a weapon against Republicans.

For anyone who wasn't happy to surf the kool-aid, the swing state 2am ballot drops and the hundreds of thousands of unfolded, unsigned, undated one check marked ballots for Biden only-- caused great concern about legitimacy even under the new moronic guidelines. Did I mention that in order for ballots to be considered valid they must be accompanied by the envelopes in which they were supposedly mailed? And that those envelopes were all summarily disposed of; all by actors unknown? That's illegal. Nonetheless though rational people would have known better, rather than having internet trolls the likes of you guys on here trying to argue down the right by virtue of 24/7 campaign using persistence your only weapon;  had at least a few applicable forensic audits been performed. And had the courts accepted even a few cases to be heard, and not just taken the collaborative/coward's way out with the ridiculous finding that the people didn't have standing. If the audits were not revelatory, and if the cases were found to be based on vapor as is the unsupported claim, the left could have claimed victory and the right would have had to shut up about it. But no, it was a 100% stonewall.
The dishonesty of the liberals who participate in this forum prevent them from examining any evidence that contradicts their party's position that there is no evidence of widespread election fraud. It doesn't matter how many videos exist or how many experts confirm that Dominion's voting machines flipped votes from Trump to Biden, as long as the Supreme Court refuses to even peek at the evidence that has been filed, liberals are going to behave like the happy mushrooms that they are. The thing is, no matter how accommodating the Supreme Court is to China Joe and the Democrat-controlled Congress is, they will likely pack the court anyway. Generations of Republican elected officials proved that compromising with Democrats is counterproductive. Like despots the world, over the only thing Democrats respond to is the credible threat of the exercise of raw power.
Quooter here you go again just like TRT if you have or had any REAL evidence you should of turned it over to your Dear Leader he  surely would have taken it after seeing some of the dumb stuff he tried
[-] The following 1 user Likes vector#1's post:
  • Cardfan1
(02-23-2021, 01:31 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 11:40 AM)TheRealThing Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 02:04 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 12:27 PM)vector#1 Wrote: Another lose for the Dear Leader and his flock

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...d=msedgdhp
Woah

wait!!!  

Weren’t these the lead pipe locks @Hoot Gibson said were going to prove Democrats stole the election??!!

no way. No.  

Boys, we’ve been hoodwinked, bamboozled, hornswoogled, snookered, buffaloed....none of this was election fraud was real.


You've done all the hornswoggling to yourself. There was never going to be a way to verify mail-in ballots in the best of situations. Towards the end, Dems were so cavalier about it they abandoned all form and/or fashion of even the appearance of trying to do things legally, and just did anything they darn well pleased. But ballots found in a duffel bag laying on a public bench, or harvested, or picked up by who knows who from makeshift cardboard drop boxes or 'gathered' by any unorthodox means and delivered in rusted out unmared vans with out of state tags and the fenders flapping, should not have been allowed. But as with every other point of contention between rabid libs and conservatives, even though there is established law on all these matters, where that law runs contrary to the interests of the left, it's simply ignored. On the other hand if the left wants to control conservatives they are sharp enough about the law to use it as a weapon against Republicans.

For anyone who wasn't happy to surf the kool-aid, the swing state 2am ballot drops and the hundreds of thousands of unfolded, unsigned, undated one check marked ballots for Biden only-- caused great concern about legitimacy even under the new moronic guidelines. Did I mention that in order for ballots to be considered valid they must be accompanied by the envelopes in which they were supposedly mailed? And that those envelopes were all summarily disposed of; all by actors unknown? That's illegal. Nonetheless though rational people would have known better, rather than having internet trolls the likes of you guys on here trying to argue down the right by virtue of 24/7 campaign using persistence your only weapon;  had at least a few applicable forensic audits been performed. And had the courts accepted even a few cases to be heard, and not just taken the collaborative/coward's way out with the ridiculous finding that the people didn't have standing. If the audits were not revelatory, and if the cases were found to be based on vapor as is the unsupported claim, the left could have claimed victory and the right would have had to shut up about it. But no, it was a 100% stonewall.
The dishonesty of the liberals who participate in this forum prevent them from examining any evidence that contradicts their party's position that there is no evidence of widespread election fraud. It doesn't matter how many videos exist or how many experts confirm that Dominion's voting machines flipped votes from Trump to Biden, as long as the Supreme Court refuses to even peek at the evidence that has been filed, liberals are going to behave like the happy mushrooms that they are. The thing is, no matter how accommodating the Supreme Court is to China Joe and the Democrat-controlled Congress is, they will likely pack the court anyway. Generations of Republican elected officials proved that compromising with Democrats is counterproductive. Like despots the world over the only thing Democrats respond to is the credible threat of the exercise of raw power.


Exactly. Libs have less than nothing by way of proof with which refute the hundreds of eye witnesses and proofs that exist out there, some of which I listed in my post. I mean, these eyewitness accounts are in the form of sworn affidavits which, if falsified would land every one of those folks in jail. Nobody is going to rush in there the way Dems did/do for lawbreaking protesters, to provide legal cover for conservatives. Those brave folks are on their own. Anybody can see that proof means nothing to libs anyway. Liberals are driven by feelings, and proof is therefore irrelevant. That's why political arguments with them seem so much like arguing with a girl. So even if one could provide such a mythical level of proof, libs would just ignore it because they already know they're own talking points are lies designed as a means to an end. Thus their protestations have zero to do with proof and everything to do with rebellion. Only their rebellion has no foundation other than the contempt they have for the foundational observations of the founders.

To the bolded. Establishment Republicans seem naturally born to be had. In addition, just about every last conservative media type has forgotten the whole fiasco and shifted back to the same old tactic of slamming the policy maneuvers of the Biden administration. Like exposure really means something in current day. Please! And I keep hearing people like Matt Schlapp of CPAC and Reince Priebus and other notable?  conservatives talking about what's right and what works and how well the Trump Administration delivered on it's promises. And all of that is true. But all the talk about campaigning and doubling down on getting the vote out for 2022, and getting the base fired up is out the window. If the last four years proved anything it was that the message of what's right or wrong falls these days, on deaf ears. I agree that right is right and that will never change. But the political climate these days is tempered by lies, not the light of truth. The predominant lie is the natural extension of LBJ's Great Society. The idea that wealth inequality is something that can be legislated (or taxed) away.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
[-] The following 1 user Likes TheRealThing's post:
  • Hoot Gibson
The delusion continues.  Big Grin

"TRT AND Wrong Way HOOTER are driven by feelings, and proof is therefore irrelevant."

Fixed that for you, TRT.   Cool

Every loss chips off more support for the Election fraud fables.  When checkbooks have to open up, more of the Mindless MAGA base will crumble away.  

This picture of a "successful" Atlantic City Casino is a perfect representation of the Trump movement.  

Woah
[attachment=112]


Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin
[-] The following 1 user Likes Cardfan1's post:
  • vector#1
(02-23-2021, 03:48 PM)TheRealThing Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 01:31 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 11:40 AM)TheRealThing Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 02:04 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 12:27 PM)vector#1 Wrote: Another lose for the Dear Leader and his flock

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...d=msedgdhp
Woah

wait!!!  

Weren’t these the lead pipe locks @Hoot Gibson said were going to prove Democrats stole the election??!!

no way. No.  

Boys, we’ve been hoodwinked, bamboozled, hornswoogled, snookered, buffaloed....none of this was election fraud was real.


You've done all the hornswoggling to yourself. There was never going to be a way to verify mail-in ballots in the best of situations. Towards the end, Dems were so cavalier about it they abandoned all form and/or fashion of even the appearance of trying to do things legally, and just did anything they darn well pleased. But ballots found in a duffel bag laying on a public bench, or harvested, or picked up by who knows who from makeshift cardboard drop boxes or 'gathered' by any unorthodox means and delivered in rusted out unmared vans with out of state tags and the fenders flapping, should not have been allowed. But as with every other point of contention between rabid libs and conservatives, even though there is established law on all these matters, where that law runs contrary to the interests of the left, it's simply ignored. On the other hand if the left wants to control conservatives they are sharp enough about the law to use it as a weapon against Republicans.

For anyone who wasn't happy to surf the kool-aid, the swing state 2am ballot drops and the hundreds of thousands of unfolded, unsigned, undated one check marked ballots for Biden only-- caused great concern about legitimacy even under the new moronic guidelines. Did I mention that in order for ballots to be considered valid they must be accompanied by the envelopes in which they were supposedly mailed? And that those envelopes were all summarily disposed of; all by actors unknown? That's illegal. Nonetheless though rational people would have known better, rather than having internet trolls the likes of you guys on here trying to argue down the right by virtue of 24/7 campaign using persistence your only weapon;  had at least a few applicable forensic audits been performed. And had the courts accepted even a few cases to be heard, and not just taken the collaborative/coward's way out with the ridiculous finding that the people didn't have standing. If the audits were not revelatory, and if the cases were found to be based on vapor as is the unsupported claim, the left could have claimed victory and the right would have had to shut up about it. But no, it was a 100% stonewall.
The dishonesty of the liberals who participate in this forum prevent them from examining any evidence that contradicts their party's position that there is no evidence of widespread election fraud. It doesn't matter how many videos exist or how many experts confirm that Dominion's voting machines flipped votes from Trump to Biden, as long as the Supreme Court refuses to even peek at the evidence that has been filed, liberals are going to behave like the happy mushrooms that they are. The thing is, no matter how accommodating the Supreme Court is to China Joe and the Democrat-controlled Congress is, they will likely pack the court anyway. Generations of Republican elected officials proved that compromising with Democrats is counterproductive. Like despots the world over the only thing Democrats respond to is the credible threat of the exercise of raw power.


Exactly. Libs have less than nothing by way of proof with which refute the hundreds of eye witnesses and proofs that exist out there, some of which I listed in my post. I mean, these eyewitness accounts are in the form of sworn affidavits which, if falsified would land every one of those folks in jail. Nobody is going to rush in there the way Dems did/do for lawbreaking protesters, to provide legal cover for conservatives. Those brave folks are on their own. Anybody can see that proof means nothing to libs anyway. Liberals are driven by feelings, and proof is therefore irrelevant. That's why political arguments with them seem so much like arguing with a girl. So even if one could provide such a mythical level of proof, libs would just ignore it because they already know they're own talking points are lies designed as a means to an end. Thus their protestations have zero to do with proof and everything to do with rebellion. Only their rebellion has no foundation other than the contempt they have for the foundational observations of the founders.

To the bolded. Establishment Republicans seem naturally born to be had. In addition, just about every last conservative media type has forgotten the whole fiasco and shifted back to the same old tactic of slamming the policy maneuvers of the Biden administration. Like exposure really means something in current day. Please! And I keep hearing people like Matt Schlapp of CPAC and Reince Priebus and other notable?  conservatives talking about what's right and what works and how well the Trump Administration delivered on it's promises. And all of that is true. But all the talk about campaigning and doubling down on getting the vote out for 2022, and getting the base fired up is out the window. If the last four years proved anything it was that the message of what's right or wrong falls these days, on deaf ears. I agree that right is right and that will never change. But the political climate these days is tempered by lies, not the light of truth. The predominant lie is the natural extension of LBJ's Great Society. The idea that wealth inequality is something that can be legislated (or taxed) away.
" Anybody can see that proof means nothing to libs anyway"
You don't have to convince the Libs about proof convince the courts and judges that's who you need to convince and it's NOT been done
Just because you and Wrong Way Quooter keep saying stuff over and over doesn't make it true i know that's a page from your  Dear Leader's playbook

How many promises has your Dear Leader kept ?
1 is all that i see he has kept he has made the rich richer other than that he has failed miserable 




 
(02-23-2021, 04:46 PM)vector#1 Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 03:48 PM)TheRealThing Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 01:31 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 11:40 AM)TheRealThing Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 02:04 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote: Woah

wait!!!  

Weren’t these the lead pipe locks @Hoot Gibson said were going to prove Democrats stole the election??!!

no way. No.  

Boys, we’ve been hoodwinked, bamboozled, hornswoogled, snookered, buffaloed....none of this was election fraud was real.


You've done all the hornswoggling to yourself. There was never going to be a way to verify mail-in ballots in the best of situations. Towards the end, Dems were so cavalier about it they abandoned all form and/or fashion of even the appearance of trying to do things legally, and just did anything they darn well pleased. But ballots found in a duffel bag laying on a public bench, or harvested, or picked up by who knows who from makeshift cardboard drop boxes or 'gathered' by any unorthodox means and delivered in rusted out unmared vans with out of state tags and the fenders flapping, should not have been allowed. But as with every other point of contention between rabid libs and conservatives, even though there is established law on all these matters, where that law runs contrary to the interests of the left, it's simply ignored. On the other hand if the left wants to control conservatives they are sharp enough about the law to use it as a weapon against Republicans.

For anyone who wasn't happy to surf the kool-aid, the swing state 2am ballot drops and the hundreds of thousands of unfolded, unsigned, undated one check marked ballots for Biden only-- caused great concern about legitimacy even under the new moronic guidelines. Did I mention that in order for ballots to be considered valid they must be accompanied by the envelopes in which they were supposedly mailed? And that those envelopes were all summarily disposed of; all by actors unknown? That's illegal. Nonetheless though rational people would have known better, rather than having internet trolls the likes of you guys on here trying to argue down the right by virtue of 24/7 campaign using persistence your only weapon;  had at least a few applicable forensic audits been performed. And had the courts accepted even a few cases to be heard, and not just taken the collaborative/coward's way out with the ridiculous finding that the people didn't have standing. If the audits were not revelatory, and if the cases were found to be based on vapor as is the unsupported claim, the left could have claimed victory and the right would have had to shut up about it. But no, it was a 100% stonewall.
The dishonesty of the liberals who participate in this forum prevent them from examining any evidence that contradicts their party's position that there is no evidence of widespread election fraud. It doesn't matter how many videos exist or how many experts confirm that Dominion's voting machines flipped votes from Trump to Biden, as long as the Supreme Court refuses to even peek at the evidence that has been filed, liberals are going to behave like the happy mushrooms that they are. The thing is, no matter how accommodating the Supreme Court is to China Joe and the Democrat-controlled Congress is, they will likely pack the court anyway. Generations of Republican elected officials proved that compromising with Democrats is counterproductive. Like despots the world over the only thing Democrats respond to is the credible threat of the exercise of raw power.


Exactly. Libs have less than nothing by way of proof with which refute the hundreds of eye witnesses and proofs that exist out there, some of which I listed in my post. I mean, these eyewitness accounts are in the form of sworn affidavits which, if falsified would land every one of those folks in jail. Nobody is going to rush in there the way Dems did/do for lawbreaking protesters, to provide legal cover for conservatives. Those brave folks are on their own. Anybody can see that proof means nothing to libs anyway. Liberals are driven by feelings, and proof is therefore irrelevant. That's why political arguments with them seem so much like arguing with a girl. So even if one could provide such a mythical level of proof, libs would just ignore it because they already know they're own talking points are lies designed as a means to an end. Thus their protestations have zero to do with proof and everything to do with rebellion. Only their rebellion has no foundation other than the contempt they have for the foundational observations of the founders.

To the bolded. Establishment Republicans seem naturally born to be had. In addition, just about every last conservative media type has forgotten the whole fiasco and shifted back to the same old tactic of slamming the policy maneuvers of the Biden administration. Like exposure really means something in current day. Please! And I keep hearing people like Matt Schlapp of CPAC and Reince Priebus and other notable?  conservatives talking about what's right and what works and how well the Trump Administration delivered on it's promises. And all of that is true. But all the talk about campaigning and doubling down on getting the vote out for 2022, and getting the base fired up is out the window. If the last four years proved anything it was that the message of what's right or wrong falls these days, on deaf ears. I agree that right is right and that will never change. But the political climate these days is tempered by lies, not the light of truth. The predominant lie is the natural extension of LBJ's Great Society. The idea that wealth inequality is something that can be legislated (or taxed) away.
" Anybody can see that proof means nothing to libs anyway"
You don't have to convince the Libs about proof convince the courts and judges that's who you need to convince and it's NOT been done
Just because you and Wrong Way Quooter keep saying stuff over and over doesn't make it true i know that's a page from your  Dear Leader's playbook

How many promises has your Dear Leader kept ?
1 is all that i see he has kept he has made the rich richer other than that he has failed miserable 




 


vector, you don't know any better, therefore I'm just not going to gang up on you. Believe whatever lie you choose. It's obvious your reality is imaginary anyway, so go for it and enjoy it -- for the moment.

Personally? I'd hate to think that the meaning for life rested on the rotted planks of the Democrat political platform because the emergent lunacy of the day will not last. But if this moment really is the heyday for you that you act like it is, is, you are one miserable little dude. Sympathies.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
(02-23-2021, 05:04 PM)TheRealThing Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 04:46 PM)vector#1 Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 03:48 PM)TheRealThing Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 01:31 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 11:40 AM)TheRealThing Wrote: You've done all the hornswoggling to yourself. There was never going to be a way to verify mail-in ballots in the best of situations. Towards the end, Dems were so cavalier about it they abandoned all form and/or fashion of even the appearance of trying to do things legally, and just did anything they darn well pleased. But ballots found in a duffel bag laying on a public bench, or harvested, or picked up by who knows who from makeshift cardboard drop boxes or 'gathered' by any unorthodox means and delivered in rusted out unmared vans with out of state tags and the fenders flapping, should not have been allowed. But as with every other point of contention between rabid libs and conservatives, even though there is established law on all these matters, where that law runs contrary to the interests of the left, it's simply ignored. On the other hand if the left wants to control conservatives they are sharp enough about the law to use it as a weapon against Republicans.

For anyone who wasn't happy to surf the kool-aid, the swing state 2am ballot drops and the hundreds of thousands of unfolded, unsigned, undated one check marked ballots for Biden only-- caused great concern about legitimacy even under the new moronic guidelines. Did I mention that in order for ballots to be considered valid they must be accompanied by the envelopes in which they were supposedly mailed? And that those envelopes were all summarily disposed of; all by actors unknown? That's illegal. Nonetheless though rational people would have known better, rather than having internet trolls the likes of you guys on here trying to argue down the right by virtue of 24/7 campaign using persistence your only weapon;  had at least a few applicable forensic audits been performed. And had the courts accepted even a few cases to be heard, and not just taken the collaborative/coward's way out with the ridiculous finding that the people didn't have standing. If the audits were not revelatory, and if the cases were found to be based on vapor as is the unsupported claim, the left could have claimed victory and the right would have had to shut up about it. But no, it was a 100% stonewall.
The dishonesty of the liberals who participate in this forum prevent them from examining any evidence that contradicts their party's position that there is no evidence of widespread election fraud. It doesn't matter how many videos exist or how many experts confirm that Dominion's voting machines flipped votes from Trump to Biden, as long as the Supreme Court refuses to even peek at the evidence that has been filed, liberals are going to behave like the happy mushrooms that they are. The thing is, no matter how accommodating the Supreme Court is to China Joe and the Democrat-controlled Congress is, they will likely pack the court anyway. Generations of Republican elected officials proved that compromising with Democrats is counterproductive. Like despots the world over the only thing Democrats respond to is the credible threat of the exercise of raw power.


Exactly. Libs have less than nothing by way of proof with which refute the hundreds of eye witnesses and proofs that exist out there, some of which I listed in my post. I mean, these eyewitness accounts are in the form of sworn affidavits which, if falsified would land every one of those folks in jail. Nobody is going to rush in there the way Dems did/do for lawbreaking protesters, to provide legal cover for conservatives. Those brave folks are on their own. Anybody can see that proof means nothing to libs anyway. Liberals are driven by feelings, and proof is therefore irrelevant. That's why political arguments with them seem so much like arguing with a girl. So even if one could provide such a mythical level of proof, libs would just ignore it because they already know they're own talking points are lies designed as a means to an end. Thus their protestations have zero to do with proof and everything to do with rebellion. Only their rebellion has no foundation other than the contempt they have for the foundational observations of the founders.

To the bolded. Establishment Republicans seem naturally born to be had. In addition, just about every last conservative media type has forgotten the whole fiasco and shifted back to the same old tactic of slamming the policy maneuvers of the Biden administration. Like exposure really means something in current day. Please! And I keep hearing people like Matt Schlapp of CPAC and Reince Priebus and other notable?  conservatives talking about what's right and what works and how well the Trump Administration delivered on it's promises. And all of that is true. But all the talk about campaigning and doubling down on getting the vote out for 2022, and getting the base fired up is out the window. If the last four years proved anything it was that the message of what's right or wrong falls these days, on deaf ears. I agree that right is right and that will never change. But the political climate these days is tempered by lies, not the light of truth. The predominant lie is the natural extension of LBJ's Great Society. The idea that wealth inequality is something that can be legislated (or taxed) away.
" Anybody can see that proof means nothing to libs anyway"
You don't have to convince the Libs about proof convince the courts and judges that's who you need to convince and it's NOT been done
Just because you and Wrong Way Quooter keep saying stuff over and over doesn't make it true i know that's a page from your  Dear Leader's playbook

How many promises has your Dear Leader kept ?
1 is all that i see he has kept he has made the rich richer other than that he has failed miserable 




 


vector, you don't know any better, therefore I'm just not going to gang up on you. Believe whatever lie you choose. It's obvious your reality is imaginary anyway, so go for it and enjoy it -- for the moment.

Personally? I'd hate to think that the meaning for life rested on the rotted planks of the Democrat political platform because the emergent lunacy of the day will not last. But if this moment really is the heyday for you that you act like it is, is, you are one miserable little dude. Sympathies.
Once again you and Wrong Way Quooter come on here and claim voter fraud and once again you have showed the courts and judges nothing zero why because you and Quooter are following your Dear Leader's Big Lie
And by the way i am not miserable in fact a lot happier than a little over a month ago
(02-23-2021, 04:12 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote: The delusion continues.  Big Grin

"TRT AND Wrong Way HOOTER are driven by feelings, and proof is therefore irrelevant."

Fixed that for you, TRT.   Cool

Every loss chips off more support for the Election fraud fables.  When checkbooks have to open up, more of the Mindless MAGA base will crumble away.  

This picture of a "successful" Atlantic City Casino is a perfect representation of the Trump movement.  

Woah



Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin


Let's get one thing straight and I fully expect you to lie your head off every time you come on here. Sworn affidavits are not delusions, but your lies are.

I don't get what you're so concerned about. Biden's in the white house, renaming Jeep 'Cherokees' is back on priority, and taxpayer funded estrogen shots are back on the table. Why aren't you guys satisfied?
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
(02-23-2021, 05:15 PM)TheRealThing Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 04:12 PM)Cardfan1 Wrote: The delusion continues.  Big Grin

"TRT AND Wrong Way HOOTER are driven by feelings, and proof is therefore irrelevant."

Fixed that for you, TRT.   Cool

Every loss chips off more support for the Election fraud fables.  When checkbooks have to open up, more of the Mindless MAGA base will crumble away.  

This picture of a "successful" Atlantic City Casino is a perfect representation of the Trump movement.  

Woah



Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin


Let's get one thing straight and I fully expect you to lie your head off every time you come on here. Sworn affidavits are not delusions, but your lies are.

I don't get what you're so concerned about. Biden's in the white house, renaming Jeep 'Cherokees' is back on priority, and taxpayer funded estrogen shots are back on the table. Why aren't you guys satisfied?
Start a thread, and we can dispute all the social discussions you want. It’s a shame that crap sets your hair on fire but a coup incited by an ex president is cool. 

This thread is about the lies and election fraud dishonesty that every judicial body from sea to shining sea 
has laughed out of court.  

Mindless Magaites will swear that Trump is a trim, muscular 250.  Big Grin

All that Election BS has been debunked over and over. Boys, your news sources are buffaloing you too. All are backpedaling as fast as they can hoping these voting companies will settle. Faux News has to admit yet again that none of their stars speak the truth.  The rest will close up shop.  

What an absolute embarrassment to the Republican Party and the United States of America! 

I’ve known the GOP has been the party of hypocrisy for years but, damn Trump just blasted the doors of any facade of truth cropdusting every Republican in his wake. 

Trump has exposed the GOP as the party of lies and manipulation.  There was never any truth to these fables only political theater for political gain.   

Trump Chumps don’t care about making America great. Hell, they are the real frauds, who will do anything for a few dollars and another day in power.

Book is closed on “stop the steal.”  I hate you fellas followed it. Time to eat some crow and move on.
(02-23-2021, 05:04 PM)TheRealThing Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 04:46 PM)vector#1 Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 03:48 PM)TheRealThing Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 01:31 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 11:40 AM)TheRealThing Wrote: You've done all the hornswoggling to yourself. There was never going to be a way to verify mail-in ballots in the best of situations. Towards the end, Dems were so cavalier about it they abandoned all form and/or fashion of even the appearance of trying to do things legally, and just did anything they darn well pleased. But ballots found in a duffel bag laying on a public bench, or harvested, or picked up by who knows who from makeshift cardboard drop boxes or 'gathered' by any unorthodox means and delivered in rusted out unmared vans with out of state tags and the fenders flapping, should not have been allowed. But as with every other point of contention between rabid libs and conservatives, even though there is established law on all these matters, where that law runs contrary to the interests of the left, it's simply ignored. On the other hand if the left wants to control conservatives they are sharp enough about the law to use it as a weapon against Republicans.

For anyone who wasn't happy to surf the kool-aid, the swing state 2am ballot drops and the hundreds of thousands of unfolded, unsigned, undated one check marked ballots for Biden only-- caused great concern about legitimacy even under the new moronic guidelines. Did I mention that in order for ballots to be considered valid they must be accompanied by the envelopes in which they were supposedly mailed? And that those envelopes were all summarily disposed of; all by actors unknown? That's illegal. Nonetheless though rational people would have known better, rather than having internet trolls the likes of you guys on here trying to argue down the right by virtue of 24/7 campaign using persistence your only weapon;  had at least a few applicable forensic audits been performed. And had the courts accepted even a few cases to be heard, and not just taken the collaborative/coward's way out with the ridiculous finding that the people didn't have standing. If the audits were not revelatory, and if the cases were found to be based on vapor as is the unsupported claim, the left could have claimed victory and the right would have had to shut up about it. But no, it was a 100% stonewall.
The dishonesty of the liberals who participate in this forum prevent them from examining any evidence that contradicts their party's position that there is no evidence of widespread election fraud. It doesn't matter how many videos exist or how many experts confirm that Dominion's voting machines flipped votes from Trump to Biden, as long as the Supreme Court refuses to even peek at the evidence that has been filed, liberals are going to behave like the happy mushrooms that they are. The thing is, no matter how accommodating the Supreme Court is to China Joe and the Democrat-controlled Congress is, they will likely pack the court anyway. Generations of Republican elected officials proved that compromising with Democrats is counterproductive. Like despots the world over the only thing Democrats respond to is the credible threat of the exercise of raw power.


Exactly. Libs have less than nothing by way of proof with which refute the hundreds of eye witnesses and proofs that exist out there, some of which I listed in my post. I mean, these eyewitness accounts are in the form of sworn affidavits which, if falsified would land every one of those folks in jail. Nobody is going to rush in there the way Dems did/do for lawbreaking protesters, to provide legal cover for conservatives. Those brave folks are on their own. Anybody can see that proof means nothing to libs anyway. Liberals are driven by feelings, and proof is therefore irrelevant. That's why political arguments with them seem so much like arguing with a girl. So even if one could provide such a mythical level of proof, libs would just ignore it because they already know they're own talking points are lies designed as a means to an end. Thus their protestations have zero to do with proof and everything to do with rebellion. Only their rebellion has no foundation other than the contempt they have for the foundational observations of the founders.

To the bolded. Establishment Republicans seem naturally born to be had. In addition, just about every last conservative media type has forgotten the whole fiasco and shifted back to the same old tactic of slamming the policy maneuvers of the Biden administration. Like exposure really means something in current day. Please! And I keep hearing people like Matt Schlapp of CPAC and Reince Priebus and other notable?  conservatives talking about what's right and what works and how well the Trump Administration delivered on it's promises. And all of that is true. But all the talk about campaigning and doubling down on getting the vote out for 2022, and getting the base fired up is out the window. If the last four years proved anything it was that the message of what's right or wrong falls these days, on deaf ears. I agree that right is right and that will never change. But the political climate these days is tempered by lies, not the light of truth. The predominant lie is the natural extension of LBJ's Great Society. The idea that wealth inequality is something that can be legislated (or taxed) away.
" Anybody can see that proof means nothing to libs anyway"
You don't have to convince the Libs about proof convince the courts and judges that's who you need to convince and it's NOT been done
Just because you and Wrong Way Quooter keep saying stuff over and over doesn't make it true i know that's a page from your  Dear Leader's playbook

How many promises has your Dear Leader kept ?
1 is all that i see he has kept he has made the rich richer other than that he has failed miserable 




 


vector, you don't know any better, therefore I'm just not going to gang up on you. Believe whatever lie you choose. It's obvious your reality is imaginary anyway, so go for it and enjoy it -- for the moment.

Personally? I'd hate to think that the meaning for life rested on the rotted planks of the Democrat political platform because the emergent lunacy of the day will not last. But if this moment really is the heyday for you that you act like it is, is, you are one miserable little dude. Sympathies.
Yes, he is one miserable little dude. Maybe he will land one of the millions of green jobs that China Joe promises to create. That would be great. Of course, scoring one of those jobs would require that Comrade vector relocate to China.
(02-23-2021, 07:37 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 05:04 PM)TheRealThing Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 04:46 PM)vector#1 Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 03:48 PM)TheRealThing Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 01:31 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote: The dishonesty of the liberals who participate in this forum prevent them from examining any evidence that contradicts their party's position that there is no evidence of widespread election fraud. It doesn't matter how many videos exist or how many experts confirm that Dominion's voting machines flipped votes from Trump to Biden, as long as the Supreme Court refuses to even peek at the evidence that has been filed, liberals are going to behave like the happy mushrooms that they are. The thing is, no matter how accommodating the Supreme Court is to China Joe and the Democrat-controlled Congress is, they will likely pack the court anyway. Generations of Republican elected officials proved that compromising with Democrats is counterproductive. Like despots the world over the only thing Democrats respond to is the credible threat of the exercise of raw power.


Exactly. Libs have less than nothing by way of proof with which refute the hundreds of eye witnesses and proofs that exist out there, some of which I listed in my post. I mean, these eyewitness accounts are in the form of sworn affidavits which, if falsified would land every one of those folks in jail. Nobody is going to rush in there the way Dems did/do for lawbreaking protesters, to provide legal cover for conservatives. Those brave folks are on their own. Anybody can see that proof means nothing to libs anyway. Liberals are driven by feelings, and proof is therefore irrelevant. That's why political arguments with them seem so much like arguing with a girl. So even if one could provide such a mythical level of proof, libs would just ignore it because they already know they're own talking points are lies designed as a means to an end. Thus their protestations have zero to do with proof and everything to do with rebellion. Only their rebellion has no foundation other than the contempt they have for the foundational observations of the founders.

To the bolded. Establishment Republicans seem naturally born to be had. In addition, just about every last conservative media type has forgotten the whole fiasco and shifted back to the same old tactic of slamming the policy maneuvers of the Biden administration. Like exposure really means something in current day. Please! And I keep hearing people like Matt Schlapp of CPAC and Reince Priebus and other notable?  conservatives talking about what's right and what works and how well the Trump Administration delivered on it's promises. And all of that is true. But all the talk about campaigning and doubling down on getting the vote out for 2022, and getting the base fired up is out the window. If the last four years proved anything it was that the message of what's right or wrong falls these days, on deaf ears. I agree that right is right and that will never change. But the political climate these days is tempered by lies, not the light of truth. The predominant lie is the natural extension of LBJ's Great Society. The idea that wealth inequality is something that can be legislated (or taxed) away.
" Anybody can see that proof means nothing to libs anyway"
You don't have to convince the Libs about proof convince the courts and judges that's who you need to convince and it's NOT been done
Just because you and Wrong Way Quooter keep saying stuff over and over doesn't make it true i know that's a page from your  Dear Leader's playbook

How many promises has your Dear Leader kept ?
1 is all that i see he has kept he has made the rich richer other than that he has failed miserable 




 


vector, you don't know any better, therefore I'm just not going to gang up on you. Believe whatever lie you choose. It's obvious your reality is imaginary anyway, so go for it and enjoy it -- for the moment.

Personally? I'd hate to think that the meaning for life rested on the rotted planks of the Democrat political platform because the emergent lunacy of the day will not last. But if this moment really is the heyday for you that you act like it is, is, you are one miserable little dude. Sympathies.
Yes, he is one miserable little dude. Maybe he will land one of the millions of green jobs that China Joe promises to create. That would be great. Of course, scoring one of those jobs would require that Comrade vector relocate to China.
I might of been a little miserable but since jan 20th things are looking up 
Now let's get back on the topic voter fraud
Wrong Way Quooter and The Wrong Thing just because you two cry voter fraud does not mean it's true 

"It's Not What You Know, It's What You Can Prove..."
[-] The following 1 user Likes vector#1's post:
  • Cardfan1
@vector#1

On fire!!!

I do admire these fellas dedication. They remind me of Wiley Coyote or Don Quixote. No success, but at least they keep trying Big Grin
(02-23-2021, 08:03 PM)vector#1 Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 07:37 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 05:04 PM)TheRealThing Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 04:46 PM)vector#1 Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 03:48 PM)TheRealThing Wrote: Exactly. Libs have less than nothing by way of proof with which refute the hundreds of eye witnesses and proofs that exist out there, some of which I listed in my post. I mean, these eyewitness accounts are in the form of sworn affidavits which, if falsified would land every one of those folks in jail. Nobody is going to rush in there the way Dems did/do for lawbreaking protesters, to provide legal cover for conservatives. Those brave folks are on their own. Anybody can see that proof means nothing to libs anyway. Liberals are driven by feelings, and proof is therefore irrelevant. That's why political arguments with them seem so much like arguing with a girl. So even if one could provide such a mythical level of proof, libs would just ignore it because they already know they're own talking points are lies designed as a means to an end. Thus their protestations have zero to do with proof and everything to do with rebellion. Only their rebellion has no foundation other than the contempt they have for the foundational observations of the founders.

To the bolded. Establishment Republicans seem naturally born to be had. In addition, just about every last conservative media type has forgotten the whole fiasco and shifted back to the same old tactic of slamming the policy maneuvers of the Biden administration. Like exposure really means something in current day. Please! And I keep hearing people like Matt Schlapp of CPAC and Reince Priebus and other notable?  conservatives talking about what's right and what works and how well the Trump Administration delivered on it's promises. And all of that is true. But all the talk about campaigning and doubling down on getting the vote out for 2022, and getting the base fired up is out the window. If the last four years proved anything it was that the message of what's right or wrong falls these days, on deaf ears. I agree that right is right and that will never change. But the political climate these days is tempered by lies, not the light of truth. The predominant lie is the natural extension of LBJ's Great Society. The idea that wealth inequality is something that can be legislated (or taxed) away.
" Anybody can see that proof means nothing to libs anyway"
You don't have to convince the Libs about proof convince the courts and judges that's who you need to convince and it's NOT been done
Just because you and Wrong Way Quooter keep saying stuff over and over doesn't make it true i know that's a page from your  Dear Leader's playbook

How many promises has your Dear Leader kept ?
1 is all that i see he has kept he has made the rich richer other than that he has failed miserable 




 


vector, you don't know any better, therefore I'm just not going to gang up on you. Believe whatever lie you choose. It's obvious your reality is imaginary anyway, so go for it and enjoy it -- for the moment.

Personally? I'd hate to think that the meaning for life rested on the rotted planks of the Democrat political platform because the emergent lunacy of the day will not last. But if this moment really is the heyday for you that you act like it is, is, you are one miserable little dude. Sympathies.
Yes, he is one miserable little dude. Maybe he will land one of the millions of green jobs that China Joe promises to create. That would be great. Of course, scoring one of those jobs would require that Comrade vector relocate to China.
I might of been a little miserable but since jan 20th things are looking up 
Now let's get back on the topic voter fraud
Wrong Way Quooter and The Wrong Thing just because you two cry voter fraud does not mean it's true 

"It's Not What You Know, It's What You Can Prove..."
Gas prices and illegal immigration are up sharply since January 20. How is the unemployment rate where you are?
(02-23-2021, 09:43 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 08:03 PM)vector#1 Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 07:37 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 05:04 PM)TheRealThing Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 04:46 PM)vector#1 Wrote: " Anybody can see that proof means nothing to libs anyway"
You don't have to convince the Libs about proof convince the courts and judges that's who you need to convince and it's NOT been done
Just because you and Wrong Way Quooter keep saying stuff over and over doesn't make it true i know that's a page from your  Dear Leader's playbook

How many promises has your Dear Leader kept ?
1 is all that i see he has kept he has made the rich richer other than that he has failed miserable 




 


vector, you don't know any better, therefore I'm just not going to gang up on you. Believe whatever lie you choose. It's obvious your reality is imaginary anyway, so go for it and enjoy it -- for the moment.

Personally? I'd hate to think that the meaning for life rested on the rotted planks of the Democrat political platform because the emergent lunacy of the day will not last. But if this moment really is the heyday for you that you act like it is, is, you are one miserable little dude. Sympathies.
Yes, he is one miserable little dude. Maybe he will land one of the millions of green jobs that China Joe promises to create. That would be great. Of course, scoring one of those jobs would require that Comrade vector relocate to China.
I might of been a little miserable but since jan 20th things are looking up 
Now let's get back on the topic voter fraud
Wrong Way Quooter and The Wrong Thing just because you two cry voter fraud does not mean it's true 

"It's Not What You Know, It's What You Can Prove..."
Gas prices and illegal immigration are up sharply since January 20. How is the unemployment rate where you are?


My guess is he lays around on a disability.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
(02-23-2021, 09:46 PM)TheRealThing Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 09:43 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 08:03 PM)vector#1 Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 07:37 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(02-23-2021, 05:04 PM)TheRealThing Wrote: vector, you don't know any better, therefore I'm just not going to gang up on you. Believe whatever lie you choose. It's obvious your reality is imaginary anyway, so go for it and enjoy it -- for the moment.

Personally? I'd hate to think that the meaning for life rested on the rotted planks of the Democrat political platform because the emergent lunacy of the day will not last. But if this moment really is the heyday for you that you act like it is, is, you are one miserable little dude. Sympathies.
Yes, he is one miserable little dude. Maybe he will land one of the millions of green jobs that China Joe promises to create. That would be great. Of course, scoring one of those jobs would require that Comrade vector relocate to China.
I might of been a little miserable but since jan 20th things are looking up 
Now let's get back on the topic voter fraud
Wrong Way Quooter and The Wrong Thing just because you two cry voter fraud does not mean it's true 

"It's Not What You Know, It's What You Can Prove..."
Gas prices and illegal immigration are up sharply since January 20. How is the unemployment rate where you are?


My guess is he lays around on a disability.

He does live in a red state. 

didn’t @vector#1 tell us he worked for our federal government?
He said he was a coal miner at one point. If he's anything like mrtvtime, it's more likely that what he does and what he actually gets paid for, bear no commonality.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  •  Previous
  • 1
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31(current)
  • 32
  • Next 

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)