[Stardust]

This is absurd. From day 1 we knew (or you should have known) that money was involved. It was a know fact that Kanter had been compensated for something. The ruling however depended on whether or not the NCAA thought that the compensation was excessive. As long as Kanter had only received money for his education it would be fine. That is where the 20k came into play, however the NCAA ruled that they couldn't accept that because it was paid directly to the Kanter family. Now the big question IMO was the 13,000 his family received. I would understand if this was why the ruling was made. However other collegiate athletes have been given the opportunity to pay it back, but not in this case. Thus, it doesn't look good on the NCAA allowing special circumstances for some, but not all. I don't believe the Kanter family had any intent on hurting UK. As they believed by the rules their son was eligible.

Abusured hunh - what a comment to make that the Kanter family had no intent in hurting UK. If they didn't then why did they lie when originally asked about whether they took ANY money. Did you forget that? I love the whole mentality of - "I'm Only Sorry, If I get Caught"! Which is what happened in this case. The Kanter attorney so - Nope, we didn't take anything. Then the findings identify that they were lying? So, let's forget the fact that they lied in the first place hunh?