Thread Rating:
04-23-2008, 11:54 AM
I was reading the Playboy Forum in the February or March edition and I came across an intriguing article.
The write was flat out against the NFL's testing players for illeagal drug use. Said it was no buisness of the league's what a player does off the field. Then he said that if the league tests players and hold them to those standards then it should for all people employed by a team. All the way down to the people who sell tickets.
The way I look at it, is that playing in the NFl is a job. Other jobs require drug testing. So what is the difference between the NFL and say Walmart? Just because they are playing a sport? So I whole-heartdly disagree with that writer. I say test them every week.
What's your thoughts BGR?
The write was flat out against the NFL's testing players for illeagal drug use. Said it was no buisness of the league's what a player does off the field. Then he said that if the league tests players and hold them to those standards then it should for all people employed by a team. All the way down to the people who sell tickets.
The way I look at it, is that playing in the NFl is a job. Other jobs require drug testing. So what is the difference between the NFL and say Walmart? Just because they are playing a sport? So I whole-heartdly disagree with that writer. I say test them every week.
What's your thoughts BGR?
04-24-2008, 06:15 PM
no just because you are an athlete doesnt mean you have more freedom than anyone else
04-25-2008, 09:29 AM
I think they should be tested and I disagree with the writer. They should be tested. I mean, if most of the players did take drugs and supplements, they will tell younger players that it is alright to take them. And it isn't. I think it is a great idea to test players for drugs.
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)