1. Bluegrassrivals
  2. Off Topic
  3. Politics and Current Events
  4. Time: "Person of the Year" is....
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Time: "Person of the Year" is....
ronald_reagan Offline
Banned
Posts: 1,006
Threads: 55
Joined: Nov 2007
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
#1
12-19-2007, 01:19 PM
Vladimir Putin.

I don't think that there could be a better fit, this year.
Find Share
Reply
ComfortEagle Offline
All Bluegrass Rivals
******
VIP Usergroup
Posts: 8,702
Threads: 1,316
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation: 0
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
#2
12-20-2007, 04:43 AM
J.K. Rowling was 3rd on the list.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Website Find Share
Reply
ronald_reagan Offline
Banned
Posts: 1,006
Threads: 55
Joined: Nov 2007
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
#3
12-21-2007, 09:31 AM
Had they had any courage, they would have made bin Laden the Person of the Year in 2001!
Find Share
Reply
ronald_reagan Offline
Banned
Posts: 1,006
Threads: 55
Joined: Nov 2007
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
#4
12-21-2007, 09:34 AM
But after 1979's pick.. that'll never happen again.
Find Share
Reply
RammsteinFan92 Offline
Cheerleader
***
Posts: 259
Threads: 21
Joined: Dec 2007
Reputation: 0
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
#5
12-21-2007, 11:51 AM
ronald_reagan Wrote:Vladimir Putin.

I don't think that there could be a better fit, this year.
lol.....hitler was person of the year once.....
Find Share
Reply
ronald_reagan Offline
Banned
Posts: 1,006
Threads: 55
Joined: Nov 2007
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
#6
12-21-2007, 12:09 PM
RammsteinFan92 Wrote:lol.....hitler was person of the year once.....

and rightfully so. As I said, bin Laden should have been as well.

Person of the year isn't exactly the nobel peace prize... its about the most news worthy and influential person at the time.
Find Share
Reply
RammsteinFan92 Offline
Cheerleader
***
Posts: 259
Threads: 21
Joined: Dec 2007
Reputation: 0
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
#7
12-22-2007, 01:16 AM
ronald_reagan Wrote:and rightfully so. As I said, bin Laden should have been as well.

Person of the year isn't exactly the nobel peace prize... its about the most news worthy and influential person at the time.
yea i know.....but i don't think he should've been person of the year in 2001
Find Share
Reply
ronald_reagan Offline
Banned
Posts: 1,006
Threads: 55
Joined: Nov 2007
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
#8
12-22-2007, 10:54 AM
RammsteinFan92 Wrote:yea i know.....but i don't think he should've been person of the year in 2001

He wasn't the person in the news the most? and had the most influence??
Find Share
Reply
adopted purple Offline
Asst. Coach
******
VIP Usergroup
Posts: 1,703
Threads: 90
Joined: Dec 2007
Reputation: 0
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
#9
12-22-2007, 05:43 PM (This post was last modified: 12-22-2007, 08:36 PM by adopted purple.)
Times" Person Of The Year" is meaningless after last years cop out. I'm 49 and I don't know if I've ever picked the same person as them. It's like they go out of their way to fool us every year. From now on I'm going with my own person of the year.Big Grin
Find Share
Reply
RammsteinFan92 Offline
Cheerleader
***
Posts: 259
Threads: 21
Joined: Dec 2007
Reputation: 0
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
#10
12-22-2007, 10:07 PM
ronald_reagan Wrote:He wasn't the person in the news the most? and had the most influence??
i know but time would've got so much crap if they made him person of the year.....plus our nation wasn't ready fo it....
Find Share
Reply
adopted purple Offline
Asst. Coach
******
VIP Usergroup
Posts: 1,703
Threads: 90
Joined: Dec 2007
Reputation: 0
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
#11
12-23-2007, 12:26 AM
RammsteinFan92 Wrote:i know but time would've got so much crap if they made him person of the year.....plus our nation wasn't ready fo it....

And never will be!!!
Find Share
Reply
 Next Oldest | Next Newest 

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)