Johnson Central 93 South Floyd 57

Raider_Nation09 · 12-04-2007, 10:59 PM

Final

Cat Fan · 12-04-2007, 11:00 PM

Looks like I called this one.

**OffTheHook** · 12-04-2007, 11:11 PM

Congrats JC.

Junk Yard Dog · 12-04-2007, 11:13 PM

I think JC will surprise some people this year.

**BlackcatAlum** · 12-04-2007, 11:14 PM

Congrats Eagles!

Watchful Eye · 12-04-2007, 11:26 PM

Congrats Eagles and Coach McKenzie.

Pupaw · 12-04-2007, 11:37 PM

Heard on the radio that Whitaker, Conley, and Crum were in double figures.
Congrats to JC and Coach McKenzie.

Hornet Nation · 12-05-2007, 02:27 AM

No suprise here. JC is going to be tough for any school in or out of the mountains.

**-STAT-** · 12-05-2007, 02:47 AM

Congrats to Johnson Central on the win.

~~ronald_reagan~~ · 12-05-2007, 03:13 AM

Junk Yard Dog Wrote:I think JC will surprise some people this year.

not only that.. but I think that SF will surprise some people as well, only in an opposite manner.

uhavenoidea · (This post was last modified: 12-05-2007, 03:54 AM by alfus21.)

ronald_reagan Wrote:not only that.. but I think that SF will surprise some people as well, only in an opposite manner.

And what does that suppose to mean

**Playboy5** · 12-05-2007, 07:18 AM

Congrats J.C. South Floyd will be lucky to match there win total from last year!

state 1 · 12-05-2007, 08:35 AM

Very impressive outing for JC and Coach Mckenzie!! Good chemistry among players. This team seems pretty solid and doesn't lose much when they go to their bench....seems like they could mix among 12 -15 players and still be strong.

**BasketBallonlyfan** · 12-05-2007, 09:59 AM

Anyone know how many 3's SF took?

HOWBOUTDEMBOYZ · 12-05-2007, 10:36 AM

Congrats JC.

cooter · 12-05-2007, 11:28 AM

Nice win for JC. South Floyd may lose to Piarist or David school this year.

57th crazer · 12-05-2007, 06:19 PM

wow thats a preety strong statment saying they might lose to those teams but congrats to the eagles on the win!!!:rockon:

LIPS · 12-05-2007, 06:29 PM

Congrats Johnson Central....South Floyd played well in the first minutes of the game I thought...good luck t JC the rest of the season....

uhavenoidea · 12-05-2007, 07:15 PM

cooter Wrote:Nice win for JC. South Floyd may lose to Piarist or David school this year.

Now i wouldnt go that far...SF beat piarist over at the panorma by 50 or so...also david doesnt have a team

LIPS · 12-05-2007, 07:17 PM

[INDENT]

uhavenoidea Wrote:Now i wouldnt go that far...SF beat piarist over at the panorma by 50 or so...also david doesnt have a team

True...
[/INDENT]

uhavenoidea · 12-05-2007, 07:18 PM

BasketBallonlyfan Wrote:Anyone know how many 3's SF took?

not for sure on an exact #, but id say about 20 or so

LIPS · 12-05-2007, 07:24 PM

[INDENT]

uhavenoidea Wrote:not for sure on an exact #, but id say about 20 or so

It wouldnt be raider basketball without the 3 ball...
[/INDENT]

uhavenoidea · 12-05-2007, 07:28 PM

true true...the raiders just need to play alot better defense, rebound, and cut down about half of there turnovers(instead of having 30, try to keep it around 15)

Cat Fan · 12-05-2007, 07:32 PM

uhavenoidea Wrote:true true...the raiders just need to play alot better defense, rebound, and cut down about half of there turnovers(instead of having 30, try to keep it around 15)

I agree with you COACH lol.

uhavenoidea · 12-05-2007, 07:36 PM

Cat Fan Wrote:I agree with you COACH lol.

u dont have to be a coach to express ur opinion with figure of speech...so make another joke there FAN!

Cat Fan · 12-05-2007, 07:40 PM

uhavenoidea Wrote:u dont have to be a coach to express ur opinion with figure of speech...so make another joke there FAN!

I'm not going against what you say, I agree if SF could do those things they would win some games. But again who wouldn't win if they played good d, reboud well, and only have a few turnovers?

**BlackcatAlum** · 12-05-2007, 07:42 PM

Guys and Gals, this isn't ICQ or Messenger so please try to use correct Grammar, and Spelling.

LIPS · 12-05-2007, 07:43 PM

[INDENT]

Cat Fan Wrote:I'm not going against what you say, I agree if SF could do those things they would win some games. But again who wouldn't win if they played good d, reboud well, and only have a few turnovers?

BL wouldnt win thats for sure.....
[/INDENT]

uhavenoidea · 12-05-2007, 07:47 PM

Cat Fan Wrote:I'm not going against what you say, I agree if SF could do those things they would win some games. But again who wouldn't win if they played good d, reboud well, and only have a few turnovers?

If u agree then why make a joke?. I said rebound in general, not exactly well. And as far as the turnovers, 15 is more than just a few. All I said was to cut half of them out. You still have to make some shots to win ball games.

LIPS · 12-05-2007, 07:50 PM

[INDENT]

uhavenoidea Wrote:If u agree then why make a joke?. I said rebound in general, not exactly well. And as far as the turnovers, 15 is more than just a few. All I said was to cut half of them out. You still have to make some shots to win ball games.

I understand what you was saying and i also agree with you..
[/INDENT]