Thread Rating:
10-19-2007, 03:09 PM
> 1) "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the
common good."
> A. Karl Marx
> B. Adolph Hitler
> C. Joseph Stalin
> D. None of the above
> 2) "It's time for a new beginning, for an end to government of the
> few, by the few, and for the few and to replace it with shared
> responsibility for shared prosperity."
> A. Lenin
> B. Mussolini
> C. Idi Amin
> D. None of the above
> 3) "(We)...can't just let business as usual go on, and that means
> something has to be taken away from some people."
> A. Nikita Khrushev
> B. Josef Goebbels
> C. Boris Yeltsin
> D. None of the above
> 4) "We have to build a political consensus and that requires people
to
give up a little bit of their own...in order to create this common
> ground."
> A. Mao Tse Dung
> B. Hugo Chavez
> C. Kim Jong Il
> D. None of the above
> 5) "I certainly think the free-market has failed."
> A. Karl Marx
> B. Lenin
> C. Molotov
> D. None of the above
>
> 6) "I think it's time to send a clear message to what has become the
> most profitable sector in (the) entire economy that they are being
> watched."
> A. Pinochet
> B. Milosevic
> C. Saddam Hussein
> D. None of the above
>
>
>
>
>
>
Answers:
> 1) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton
> 6/29/2004
> 2) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton
> 5/29/2007
> 3) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton
> 6/4/2007
> 4) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton
> 6/4/2007
> 5) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton
> 6/4/2007
> 6) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton
> 9/2/2005
>
> VOTE!
>
common good."
> A. Karl Marx
> B. Adolph Hitler
> C. Joseph Stalin
> D. None of the above
> 2) "It's time for a new beginning, for an end to government of the
> few, by the few, and for the few and to replace it with shared
> responsibility for shared prosperity."
> A. Lenin
> B. Mussolini
> C. Idi Amin
> D. None of the above
> 3) "(We)...can't just let business as usual go on, and that means
> something has to be taken away from some people."
> A. Nikita Khrushev
> B. Josef Goebbels
> C. Boris Yeltsin
> D. None of the above
> 4) "We have to build a political consensus and that requires people
to
give up a little bit of their own...in order to create this common
> ground."
> A. Mao Tse Dung
> B. Hugo Chavez
> C. Kim Jong Il
> D. None of the above
> 5) "I certainly think the free-market has failed."
> A. Karl Marx
> B. Lenin
> C. Molotov
> D. None of the above
>
> 6) "I think it's time to send a clear message to what has become the
> most profitable sector in (the) entire economy that they are being
> watched."
> A. Pinochet
> B. Milosevic
> C. Saddam Hussein
> D. None of the above
>
>
>
>
>
>
Answers:
> 1) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton
> 6/29/2004
> 2) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton
> 5/29/2007
> 3) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton
> 6/4/2007
> 4) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton
> 6/4/2007
> 5) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton
> 6/4/2007
> 6) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton
> 9/2/2005
>
> VOTE!
>
QB Challenge Champion, Just Pitching Champion, Midi Golf Champion- My Greatest Accomplishments in Life
10-19-2007, 03:42 PM
Lol
10-19-2007, 06:50 PM
No. 5 kinda suprises me, but the others don't.
10-19-2007, 11:08 PM
Old School Wrote:No. 5 kinda suprises me, but the others don't.
vote carefully if she runs, even if you're a democrat.
QB Challenge Champion, Just Pitching Champion, Midi Golf Champion- My Greatest Accomplishments in Life
10-19-2007, 11:51 PM
As of now... she will get my vote!
**Send me a pm if you have any questions or comments**
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
10-20-2007, 09:17 AM
This belongs in political...moved!
10-20-2007, 11:04 AM
15thRegionCrazy Wrote:As of now... she will get my vote!
What part of any of those quotes are you ok with? How are you ok with those parts???
QB Challenge Champion, Just Pitching Champion, Midi Golf Champion- My Greatest Accomplishments in Life
10-20-2007, 12:58 PM
BFritz Wrote:What part of any of those quotes are you ok with? How are you ok with those parts???
It's a girl, what do ya expect, lol.
10-22-2007, 02:20 PM
Redneck Wrote:It's a girl, what do ya expect, lol.
lol....... I know what you mean. He has no response though, so I guess he's one of those people who just assumes that republicans are the cause for all the world's problems and would elect Satan if he were a democrat.
QB Challenge Champion, Just Pitching Champion, Midi Golf Champion- My Greatest Accomplishments in Life
10-22-2007, 03:46 PM
Vote John Edwards!!!!!!
BFritz Wrote:2) "It's time for a new beginning, for an end to government of the
few, by the few, and for the few and to replace it with shared responsibility for shared prosperity.
We can't just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people.
We have to build a political consensus and that requires people to give up a little bit of their own...in order to create this common ground.
I think it's time to send a clear message to what has become the most profitable sector in (the) entire economy that they are being watched."
When your living under what amounts to a near Fascist Administration. These points are all valid and seem very Socialist.
Facism and Communism are polar opposites of each other.
The middle ground is what we should be focusing on here. Not finding more and more ways to show how one side is better than the other.
When Corprate assests are siezed by the Goverment and federalized that is Communism.
When Government assets are siezed(bought) by Companies(privatization) that is Fascism.
All the Bush Administration talks about is Privatization. We've even Privatized the War!
10-22-2007, 04:17 PM
I am no real Hillary fan, but when you pull a piece of a larger argument out and place it somewhere WITHOUT CONTEXT it is possible to take even the most careful speaker and paint them however you wish. George Bush, oh my gosh. Rudy Guiliani...oh my gosh. Anybody. So, while cute and maybe quaint, this little exercise adds NOTHING to serious political debate.
10-22-2007, 07:25 PM
BFritz Wrote:lol....... I know what you mean. He has no response though, so I guess he's one of those people who just assumes that republicans are the cause for all the world's problems and would elect Satan if he were a democrat.
No the point he was trying to make is 15th is a girl.
10-23-2007, 03:24 PM
I think the Republicans are "foaming at the mouth" wanting Hillary to be nominated. I'm not racist and Im not sexist. But I just don't see Hillary or Obama winning in the general election. I'm just trying to look at it through a realistic point of view. All you hear on the news is how the Republican base split is and unenergized. Well Im here to tell ya.......nothing will unite them faster than getting to run against Hillary.
10-23-2007, 04:43 PM
Women, last I heard, make up about 56% of the US voting population, as they live longer than men due to driving
men's blood pressure up with all the nagging (kidding)...
Enough women may think that we men have messed stuff up
long enough that they vote for Hillary in just enough
numbers to turn the general election. If fact, that's
pretty much what I think will happen.
men's blood pressure up with all the nagging (kidding)...
Enough women may think that we men have messed stuff up
long enough that they vote for Hillary in just enough
numbers to turn the general election. If fact, that's
pretty much what I think will happen.
10-23-2007, 04:56 PM
thecavemaster Wrote:Women, last I heard, make up about 56% of the US voting population, as they live longer than men due to driving
men's blood pressure up with all the nagging (kidding)...
Enough women may think that we men have messed stuff up
long enough that they vote for Hillary in just enough
numbers to turn the general election. If fact, that's
pretty much what I think will happen.
I strongly disagree! Go John Edwards!!!!!
10-23-2007, 05:18 PM
For any candidate to win a general election they must appeal to the Independent voters. No candidate can win a general election based soley on Republican votes, Democratic votes, female votes, African American votes or White Male votes. Right now....Hillary is the clear frontrunner. But its still almost 3 months until Iowa and let us not forget how everyone was proclaiming Howad Dean the nominee in '04 at this point. John Kerry ended up winning Iowa and never looked back.
10-24-2007, 12:09 AM
thecavemaster Wrote:Women, last I heard, make up about 56% of the US voting population, as they live longer than men due to driving
men's blood pressure up with all the nagging (kidding)...
Enough women may think that we men have messed stuff up
long enough that they vote for Hillary in just enough
numbers to turn the general election. If fact, that's
pretty much what I think will happen.
I agree that Hillary will likely win, but I don't think it's because she will get all the female vote. I think there will be some females, as well as some males, who would never vote for any woman for president.
I believe that Hillary will win the Democratic nomination because of all the admiration that the party still has for her husband and because she appeals to the party's liberal base. Furthermore, I believe that whoever emerges with the Democrat nomination will win the general election no matter who gets the Republican nomination, due to the strong negative feelings many Americans have toward Bush.
SHELBY VALLEY WILDCATS - 2010 KHSAA STATE CHAMPIONS
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
10-24-2007, 12:20 PM
More Cowbell Wrote:I agree that Hillary will likely win, but I don't think it's because she will get all the female vote. I think there will be some females, as well as some males, who would never vote for any woman for president.
I believe that Hillary will win the Democratic nomination because of all the admiration that the party still has for her husband and because she appeals to the party's liberal base. Furthermore, I believe that whoever emerges with the Democrat nomination will win the general election no matter who gets the Republican nomination, due to the strong negative feelings many Americans have toward Bush.
Good post... I think the one thing that might change the tenor of the general election is some sort of terror attack (God forbid) on American soil. Other than that, I think it will be very hard for the Republican candidate to win both Ohio and Flordia, which without one or the other, means a win for the Deomocrat.
10-24-2007, 02:10 PM
If Hillary wins Iowa....it's game over for the Democratic nomination. But if Edwards or Obama wins Iowa, it's a new ballgame.
10-25-2007, 02:47 PM
thecavemaster Wrote:Good post... I think the one thing that might change the tenor of the general election is some sort of terror attack (God forbid) on American soil. Other than that, I think it will be very hard for the Republican candidate to win both Ohio and Flordia, which without one or the other, means a win for the Deomocrat.
Agreed, I think all the 'swing' states will go to the Democrats in next year's presidential election.
SHELBY VALLEY WILDCATS - 2010 KHSAA STATE CHAMPIONS
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
10-26-2007, 12:15 PM
Just vote Republican, cause if you're not right you're wrong. Plus Hillary would ruin the US. She would weaken our military, socialize our economy and limit aid to foreign countries in need.
10-26-2007, 12:46 PM
Booya Wrote:Just vote Republican, cause if you're not right you're wrong. Plus Hillary would ruin the US. She would weaken our military, socialize our economy and limit aid to foreign countries in need.You don't think Bush has weakened our military? Recruitment is at an all time low. So low in fact that the standards have been lowered for entry. Instead of having a military filled with the best America has to offer it's now full of Criminals who 10 years ago would have been laughed out of the recruiters office. The military is stretched way beyond its capability. Sure Bush is spending Trillions of dollars in Iraq but most of that money is going to the Civilian Contractors.
The current Republican administration has in 7 years transformed the U.S from a Prosperous Nation of Peace into a Broken Nation of War. Congratulations:thumpsup:
"If you're not part of the politcal right, then you're wrong."
The quality, the power, of these words... When one reduces political debate, political philosophy down to quaint bumper sticker logic, I tend to think that my vote should count ten and Bumper Sticker Man's vote count one.
The quality, the power, of these words... When one reduces political debate, political philosophy down to quaint bumper sticker logic, I tend to think that my vote should count ten and Bumper Sticker Man's vote count one.
10-29-2007, 02:14 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-29-2007, 02:17 PM by Crossbones.)
Booya Wrote:Just vote Republican, cause if you're not right you're wrong. Plus Hillary would ruin the US. She would weaken our military, socialize our economy and limit aid to foreign countries in need.I don't care who you are, republican or democrat. I say piss on aid to foreign countries. There are people right here in America that needs aid. I'm sick and tired of my tax dollars going to other countries when all our buiness's are going too, to save money on payroll and people right here are starving and homeless. As far as military, build it up to protect our borders and let everyone else fend for themselves. IMO.
10-29-2007, 08:03 PM
Crossbones Wrote: I don't care who you are, republican or democrat. I say **** on aid to foreign countries. There are people right here in America that needs aid. I'm sick and tired of my tax dollars going to other countries when all our buiness's are going too, to save money on payroll and people right here are starving and homeless. As far as military, build it up to protect our borders and let everyone else fend for themselves. IMO.Wow....totally agree with you here!
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
10-31-2007, 01:25 PM
Beef Wrote:Wow....totally agree with you here!I would of said more, but I try to keep my political opinions to myself.
11-02-2007, 12:59 PM
Crossbones Wrote: I don't care who you are, republican or democrat. I say **** on aid to foreign countries. There are people right here in America that needs aid. I'm sick and tired of my tax dollars going to other countries when all our buiness's are going too, to save money on payroll and people right here are starving and homeless. As far as military, build it up to protect our borders and let everyone else fend for themselves. IMO.
I agree with you, unfortunately the US has become something like the world's older, cooler, brother. I know that it sucks to pay tax dollars to foriegn aid projects, but these projects help us to gain allies throughout the world. Also, the US being a society of capitalism we have the belief that someone can rise up and become something greater through their own will. Historically churches played the role of giving aid to Americans, but that role changed during the depression when most churches had little money themselves. maybe to help out our fellow people politicians that raise 30+ million dollars in campaign funds, could give a large portion of that to people in need.
11-28-2007, 12:32 AM
DevilsWin Wrote:When your living under what amounts to a near Fascist Administration. These points are all valid and seem very Socialist.
Facism and Communism are polar opposites of each other.
The middle ground is what we should be focusing on here. Not finding more and more ways to show how one side is better than the other.
When Corprate assests are siezed by the Goverment and federalized that is Communism.
When Government assets are siezed(bought) by Companies(privatization) that is Fascism.
All the Bush Administration talks about is Privatization. We've even Privatized the War!
you're wrong. flat out.
facism and communism are NOT polar opposites. they are both socialist based belief systems. anyone with any amount of study or education on this would agree.
Further, Facism has nothing to do with privatization!!! Capitalism is what you are referring to. Nazi Germany's leading party was what?? The National SOCIALIST Germany Workers Party.
So please, refrain from lying. Its not worth it, just to make a point. Bush is bad, we all agree. But using quarter truths, and whole lies isn't a way to make people believe you.
11-28-2007, 06:55 PM
Clinton has been identified by a former college professor of hers as a socialist. These comments shouldn't come as a suprise to anyone.
Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)