[The Urban Sombrero]

Now, why would Donald Trump fire Bob Mueller if doing so endangered his very Presidency and the majority status of his party? Because preserving his Presidency and/or a Republican majority is not Trump’s major concern with Mueller’s investigation. And we all know it. It’s time to put on the Big Boy pants, echo chamber, and face some increasingly obvious truths about one Donald Trump.

[64SUR]

:Cheerlead :Cheerlead :Cheerlead

[Bob Seger]

Now, why would Donald Trump fire Bob Mueller if doing so endangered his very Presidency and the majority status of his party? Because preserving his Presidency and/or a Republican majority is not Trump’s major concern with Mueller’s investigation. And we all know it. It’s time to put on the Big Boy pants, echo chamber, and face some increasingly obvious truths about one Donald Trump.

What I am so happy about is that a hypocritical rambler is back and now "the" Gitback doesn't have to try to think all by himself anymore....lol

nicker:

[The Urban Sombrero]

What I am so happy about is that a hypocritical rambler is back and now "the" Gitback doesn't have to try to think all by himself anymore....lol

nicker:

See “crumbs” and ramble on it, as you skate unimpeded in the hypocritical world of the echo chamber.

[TheRealThing]

Now, why would Donald Trump fire Bob Mueller if doing so endangered his very Presidency and the majority status of his party? Because preserving his Presidency and/or a Republican majority is not Trump’s major concern with Mueller’s investigation. And we all know it. It’s time to put on the Big Boy pants, echo chamber, and face some increasingly obvious truths about one Donald Trump.

What a load of self serving malarkey. If there was one shred of evidence connecting DJT to Russia, Mueller would have been all over it by now. That and the fact that if Dems had been telling the truth, and were the claims of collusion in any way true, why would the DNC still be refusing to turn over their 'hacked' servers to the FBI (which BTW are sure to have evidence of Russian interference in them) and blow any hope of a defense on the matter out of the water? Answer; The DNC knows full well the whole thing is a complete farce. That and the fact that there's so much dirt on those servers there aren't enough "cloths" in the land to wipe them off. They'll never turn those servers over. And we all know it.

[The Urban Sombrero]

⬆️
“I didn’t even stay the night in Moscow.” -the tweeting don

Uh, check those photo stamps, Mr. President. The trained prosecutor builds a case slowly, working from bottom to top, close to vest, so as not to spook the big game. Though seems pretty spooked. Yada, yada, yada in the echo chamber. You a member of Mar Lago, there kimosabe?

[TheRealThing]

⬆️
“I didn’t even stay the night in Moscow.” -the tweeting don

Uh, check those photo stamps, Mr. President. The trained prosecutor builds a case slowly, working from bottom to top, close to vest, so as not to spook the big game. Though seems pretty spooked. Yada, yada, yada in the echo chamber. You a member of Mar Lago, there kimosabe?

I see your predilection for embracing those old projectionist demons remains undiminished. The mountain of evidence condemning Democrats has been proven. While the evidence in support of your obsession still stands at zero. But if just saying stuff really meant anything, you'd be unstoppable.

[The Urban Sombrero]

⬆️
When a man lies about spending the night in Moscow, ANY prosecutor wants to know why. And, for all your verbal fluff, I didn’t know believers yoked up with “trim my wick I pay you off” practitioners. Politics makes strange bedfellows, huh? I see you continue to stare into the abyss of lies and call it a canyon of nothing. How convenient.

[TheRealThing]

⬆️
When a man lies about spending the night in Moscow, ANY prosecutor wants to know why. And, for all your verbal fluff, I didn’t know believers yoked up with “trim my wick I pay you off” practitioners. Politics makes strange bedfellows, huh? I see you continue to stare into the abyss of lies and call it a canyon of nothing. How convenient.

You've acted as if you have inside information about this matter from the get-go. I'm sure Mueller has you on speed dial. But first you went on and on saying there was no wiretap. Wrong. Then youi were absolutely certain records from Deutsche Bank were his end. Wrong. Not to mention the fact that you just said the President is going to fire Mueller. Wrong again. I could go on of course, but why belabor the point? To hear you talk, only you and Mueller know what's going on and poor old Devon Nunes and company are a bunch of uninformed dullards.

Please do continue though, and tell us more of the specifics pertaining to the way a "trained prosecutor" operates. :hilarious:

[The Urban Sombrero]

⬆️
Of course, you said “President Obama had Trump tower wire tapped.” Bombastic and false.

You hitched your self-righteous wagon to a dishonest star. I’m sorry, TRT. It must be difficult. Are you a member of Mar Lago?

[TheRealThing]

⬆️


> Of course, you said “President Obama had Trump tower wire tapped.” Bombastic and false.

> You hitched your self-righteous wagon to a dishonest star. I’m sorry, TRT. It must be difficult. Are you a member of Mar Lago?

> No now that's completely errant, nonetheless darn close for the drivel you usually come up with. What follows is the factual turn of events and your characterizations of them. President Trump said by way of tweet, "Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"

After which you came unhinged, declaring then President Trump mentally incompetent. You even started a thread about it as I recall. What I said was as follows; Obama had his thumb on every function of government and you can bet he knew what was going on with regard to Trump Tower. Which of course is still my position and unlike the stiff wind blowing from your camp, has the notable distinction of having been proven to be the case.

> My "wagon," isn't hitched to the fortunes of anyone and my opinions are my own, not handed to me by the liberal mushrooms of MSNBC. Further, the identity of my star has been characterized much more eloquently by Another; Revelation 22:16 (KJV)
V16 I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.


So ironically once again, in mixing metaphors in yet another vain attempt to appear smart, you have unwittingly stumbled across the truth without having recognized it. Your wagon is hitched to the DNC and MSNBC. While mine is hitched to The Morning Star. A happy situation which makes discerning the truth sooo much easier.

[Bob Seger]

Looks like Geraldo is in panic mode.

[The Urban Sombrero]

> No now that's completely errant, nonetheless darn close for the drivel you usually come up with. What follows is the factual turn of events and your characterizations of them. President Trump said by way of tweet, "Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"

After which you came unhinged, declaring then President Trump mentally incompetent. You even started a thread about it as I recall. What I said was as follows; Obama had his thumb on every function of government and you can bet he knew what was going on with regard to Trump Tower. Which of course is still my position and unlike the stiff wind blowing from your camp, has the notable distinction of having been proven to be the case.

> My "wagon," isn't hitched to the fortunes of anyone and my opinions are my own, not handed to me by the liberal mushrooms of MSNBC. Further, the identity of my star has been characterized much more eloquently by Another; Revelation 22:16 (KJV)
V16 I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.


So ironically once again, in mixing metaphors in yet another vain attempt to appear smart, you have unwittingly stumbled across the truth without having recognized it. Your wagon is hitched to the DNC and MSNBC. While mine is hitched to The Morning Star. A happy situation which makes discerning the truth sooo much easier.

Barack Obama did not order the wiretapping of Donald Trump. That is an assertion gone wanting for fact. However, Donald Trump did have a Stormy night, did stay in Moscow at the Ritz Carlton, did suggest a rich and powerful man can grab female genitalia unhindered, did default on loans, did accept money from Russians. Soon enough, we'll know. Donald Trump has feet of clay, gummy, nasty clay. Yet, he supports and advocates for policies which scratch ears in the Echo Chamber. NO worries. This is politics. Plain and simple. As to the "Morning Star," I stand ready to reason from the Scriptures with you. Any time. Any place. You won't. Pity. It would be fun.

[TheRealThing]

Barack Obama did not order the wiretapping of Donald Trump. That is an assertion gone wanting for fact. However, Donald Trump did have a Stormy night, did stay in Moscow at the Ritz Carlton, did suggest a rich and powerful man can grab female genitalia unhindered, did default on loans, did accept money from Russians. Soon enough, we'll know. Donald Trump has feet of clay, gummy, nasty clay. Yet, he supports and advocates for policies which scratch ears in the Echo Chamber. NO worries. This is politics. Plain and simple. As to the "Morning Star," I stand ready to reason from the Scriptures with you. Any time. Any place. You won't. Pity. It would be fun.

IMO every complaint you have with DJT is based on your political ideology, which is squirrelly at the very best and which drives your contempt. A contempt which is admittedly, epic. But in the end nobody listens to you except Gitback. But more importantly you only get one vote, and I could care less how you choose to waste it.

Again, you don't have any idea who ordered the wiretap that you previously stated in categorical terms never happened. Do I really need to go back and quote the imminent Sombrero? Contempt, which is obviously your guiding star, leads you to believe the traitorous and rabid chipmunks at MSN BS. But for those of us with a less abstract palate and according to Devin Nunes and Jim Jordan, (whose security clearances are evidently not as elevated as your own) the evidence more than likely leads to the door of the White House. At this point it might be a good idea for you to look up the meaning of the word administration. Evidence BTW, is what's missing from the argument your side started about this President. Democrats just did the same thing with Rear Admiral Ronnie Jackson USN (Ret). And now veterans who served this nation are deprived of the leadership at the VA that they deserve. The Admiral's detractors BTW themselves, are not worthy to be his foot valet.

I would not waste my time, nor would I dishonor my Savior in debating His Word with you. Bananas don't come from apple trees, and Christians don't belch out affronteries or otherwise reject certain portions of Scripture which do not happen to line up with their (as in your case) questionable political leanings.

[The Urban Sombrero]

IMO every complaint you have with DJT is based on your political ideology, which is squirrelly at the very best and which drives your contempt. A contempt which is admittedly, epic. But in the end nobody listens to you except Gitback. But more importantly you only get one vote, and I could care less how you choose to waste it.

Again, you don't have any idea who ordered the wiretap that you previously stated in categorical terms never happened. Do I really need to go back and quote the imminent Sombrero? Contempt, which is obviously your guiding star, leads you to believe the traitorous and rabid chipmunks at MSN BS. But for those of us with a less abstract palate and according to Devin Nunes and Jim Jordan, (whose security clearances are evidently not as elevated as your own) the evidence more than likely leads to the door of the White House. At this point it might be a good idea for you to look up the meaning of the word administration. Evidence BTW, is what's missing from the argument your side started about this President. Democrats just did the same thing with Rear Admiral Ronnie Jackson USN (Ret). And now veterans who served this nation are deprived of the leadership at the VA that they deserve. The Admiral's detractors BTW themselves, are not worthy to be his foot valet.

I would not waste my time, nor would I dishonor my Savior in debating His Word with you. Bananas don't come from apple trees, and Christians don't belch out affronteries or otherwise reject certain portions of Scripture which do not happen to line up with their (as in your case) questionable political leanings.

Truth is, you are the kid who brags about dunking but never shows up at the playground.

It would dishonor Christ to reason from the Scriptures? What a jokester.

Donald Trump is amoral at best. His personal life, lived out loud for decades, demonstrates that. And you wear the dunce cap for appearing blind to it.

[TheRealThing]

Truth is, you are the kid who brags about dunking but never shows up at the playground.

It would dishonor Christ to reason from the Scriptures? What a jokester.

Donald Trump is amoral at best. His personal life, lived out loud for decades, demonstrates that. And you wear the dunce cap for appearing blind to it.

Projection, denial and the ability to fantasize are the go to's for the virile liberal/progressive. And you do it so well.

[The Urban Sombrero]

Projection, denial and the ability to fantasize are the go to's for the virile liberal/progressive. And you do it so well.

“I can dunk. You saying I can’t is projection.”

It’s not. Come to the playground.

“See. Projection.”

Sad, sad little man.

At any rate, you’re a Trumper, a trumputer for the Tweeter-in-Chief. We’ll see.

[TheRealThing]

“I can dunk. You saying I can’t is projection.”

It’s not. Come to the playground.

“See. Projection.”

Sad, sad little man.

At any rate, you’re a Trumper, a trumputer for the Tweeter-in-Chief. We’ll see.

Maybe in a five gallon bucket if you had a step ladder.

Your blather is all so ridiculous, when the President is exonerated it won't even be fun to say I told you so. The laser did finally fall on your evil step mommy and her minions though. Should be a lasting source of entertainment over the next 15 years.

[Bob Seger]

Barack Obama did not order the wiretapping of Donald Trump. That is an assertion gone wanting for fact. However, Donald Trump did have a Stormy night, did stay in Moscow at the Ritz Carlton, did suggest a rich and powerful man can grab female genitalia unhindered, did default on loans, did accept money from Russians. Soon enough, we'll know. Donald Trump has feet of clay, gummy, nasty clay. Yet, he supports and advocates for policies which scratch ears in the Echo Chamber. NO worries. This is politics. Plain and simple. As to the "Morning Star," I stand ready to reason from the Scriptures with you. Any time. Any place. You won't. Pity. It would be fun.

Hey everybody, here it is again... Everybody catch it.

Aint he neat?

And so smart...

[Bob Seger]

Barack Obama did not order the wiretapping of Donald Trump. That is an assertion gone wanting for fact. However, Donald Trump did have a Stormy night, did stay in Moscow at the Ritz Carlton, did suggest a rich and powerful man can grab female genitalia unhindered, did default on loans, did accept money from Russians. Soon enough, we'll know. Donald Trump has feet of clay, gummy, nasty clay. Yet, he supports and advocates for policies which scratch ears in the Echo Chamber. NO worries. This is politics. Plain and simple. As to the "Morning Star," I stand ready to reason from the Scriptures with you. Any time. Any place. You won't. Pity. It would be fun.

So sayeth the scribes, the Pharisees, and the hypocrites.

[TheRealThing]

So sayeth the scribes, the Pharisees, and the hypocrites.

^^ :rockon: The Scriptures are not up for debate anyway.

2 Timothy 3:16 (KJV)
16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

For those not inspired of God, scriptures can be twisted to mean just about anything men can imagine. Much less trying to imagine themselves in any way being reproved or corrected. Therefore I have no further interest in belaboring that which the Holy Spirit has revealed with a guy whose gotten it wrong more times than Wrongway Wainwright.

[The Urban Sombrero]

⬆️
Blah, blah, blah

“I, being able to dunk, don’t have to prove I can dunk.”

Blah, blah, blah

[TheRealThing]

⬆️
Blah, blah, blah

“I, being able to dunk, don’t have to prove I can dunk.”

Blah, blah, blah

You have posted extensively about Scripture on here and in so doing, you have left nothing to speculate about. In addition, as in every case where you chose to nosedive said debate into a ditch, I refuse to help rehabilitate your tattered online persona. But you go ahead and soldier on.

[The Urban Sombrero]

You have posted extensively about Scripture on here and in so doing, you have left nothing to speculate about. In addition, as in every case where you chose to nosedive said debate into a ditch, I refuse to help rehabilitate your tattered online persona. But you go ahead and soldier on.

⬆️ This kind of rot is peacockian. You may dance around all you wish. The only rehabilitation you can possibly offer is a concoction of your own mind’s making. You won’t come to the schoolyard court. Reasoning from Scripture unto Scripture is not debating. It is scaffolding unto proof. “It is written again” is reasoning from Scripture. I stood and stand ready.

[Bob Seger]

⬆️ This kind of rot is peacockian. You may dance around all you wish. The only rehabilitation you can possibly offer is a concoction of your own mind’s making. You won’t come to the schoolyard court. Reasoning from Scripture unto Scripture is not debating. It is scaffolding unto proof. “It is written again” is reasoning from Scripture. I stood and stand ready.

Weeee Doggies, here we go with one of the classics..


Does this mean we'll get to see this one in the next 127 straight posts again?

[TheRealThing]

Weeee Doggies, here we go with one of the classics..


Does this mean we'll get to see this one in the next 127 straight posts again?

LOL, not if it depends on any more responses from me.

[The Urban Sombrero]

Weeee Doggies, here we go with one of the classics..


Does this mean we'll get to see this one in the next 127 straight posts again?

Once upon a time, in a place far, far away, some guy in the corner said, "Hey, Cindyrelli, iffen da shoe fits, wear it."

[Bob Seger]

Once upon a time, in a place far, far away, some guy in the corner said, "Hey, Cindyrelli, iffen da shoe fits, wear it."

Well, I guess you feel that that was a funny little snippet that was supposed to mean something, but I am sure that I am like everyone that is trying to figure out what in the heck it is that you just said and how does it apply to your boresome repetitive yada yada phrases that you constantly come up with.

[Granny Bear]

I'm still trying to figure out why he kicked 2 couches.

[Bob Seger]

I'm still trying to figure out why he kicked 2 couches.

Because the cat escaped out the door and clumb up a tree.:biggrin: