Thread Rating:
09-20-2014, 06:23 AM
Diogenes Wrote:It isn't. Catron out, Joplin left, multiple others hurt. Obviously, Pikeville is a good team and earned the win. But this Belfry team has suffered some injuries/defections. It takes time to adjust.Pikeville had at least 3 players out that I know of. With depth more at a premium than it is a Belfry, the injured player excuse is played out. Keep chewing, the crow don't taste better, but it gets easier to swallow.
09-20-2014, 06:24 AM
RunItUpTheGut Wrote:One more loss and Haywood is gone.
:hilarious:
09-20-2014, 06:25 AM
BREAKING NEWS:
The judge has rescinded his earlier decision allowing the child to be placed at [B]Pikeville. Turns out, they like to "take switch to the behinds". Officials are now debating possibly placing the child with their red headed step-brother, Pike Central because they are not capable of beating anyone from Belfry.
:ChairHit:[/QUOTE]
Touche!![/B]
The judge has rescinded his earlier decision allowing the child to be placed at [B]Pikeville. Turns out, they like to "take switch to the behinds". Officials are now debating possibly placing the child with their red headed step-brother, Pike Central because they are not capable of beating anyone from Belfry.
:ChairHit:[/QUOTE]
Touche!![/B]
09-20-2014, 06:26 AM
skully03 Wrote:Double G. From what I can tell henry Clay has been scoring like crazy since their loss to Belfry. To me that says a lot that Belfry was extremely flat. Not taking any thing away from Pikeville they played a heck of a game and time managment was critical. Like I said before McNamee controlled this game. This is definitive not the same belfry team from the previous 3 weeks.
The DANGER of this kind of thinking and can sabotage the VALUE to be found in a loss is... it's possible it was Henry Clay who was "flat" in its game with the Pirates instead of Belfry "flat" tonight vs. the Panthers. Consider that.
There's NO way to know for sure.
09-20-2014, 06:26 AM
OutlawJoseyWales Wrote:Not really sure what "psychobabble" your referring too......
What I posted was fair...and spot on in terms of objectively looking at this game and how Belfry played.
BTW.....I don't think I made any "predictions" about this game....
Love it when people spew their opinion and then call it objective.
09-20-2014, 06:26 AM
zaga_fan Wrote:I'm upset that this one isn't out of hand yet...
Pikeville and Belfry have been here before. These two schools, while bitter rivals, have a mutual respect for one another. This isn't Alabama/Auburn where people are poisoning trees. I was talking some to some Belfry fans after the game and we were both wishing each other luck the rest of the season. I saw Pikeville fans patting Belfry players on the helmet and telling them to keep their heads up and that they were still a good team. That's how the 2 programs that put mountain football on the map do it. Good Luck the rest of the year Pirates and HAIL PIKEVILLE!!!
09-20-2014, 06:28 AM
PHSForever Wrote:There was no push because the focus was containment. A big push would open the end runs. The LBs slow on the reads means they were holding their gaps. Football 101 against Belfrys offense. Pikeville had the speed to slow down and make the right reads, then speed up and gang tackle. Don't insult the boys by trying to pass it off as Belfry having no fire or hunger. All I've read from posters like 1991#8 is how Belfry looks forward to "beating us bad" and so forth. For a solid week it has been like that. Now it's "oh, no fire, no hunger. Wail! We've seen this and talked about it for a while now". Just hush and enjoy the crow compliments of the county champs this year. Need a little more salt to make it palatable? Read below::lmao:
BREAKING NEWS:
The judge has rescinded his earlier decision allowing the child to be placed at Pikeville. Turns out, they like to "take switch to the behinds". Officials are now debating possibly placing the child with their red headed step-brother, Pike Central because they are not capable of beating anyone from Belfry.
:ChairHit:
09-20-2014, 06:29 AM
oneijoe Wrote:The DANGER of this kind of thinking and can sabotage the VALUE to be found in a loss is... it's possible it was Henry Clay who was "flat" in its game with the Pirates instead of Belfry "flat" tonight vs. the Panthers. Consider that.
There's NO way to know for sure.
I almost never buy the "flat" excuse. What he is trying to say is Pikeville kept punching Belfry in the face and Belfry for some unknown reason didn't feel like punching back tonight? Very lame and almost all of the Belfry posters have given credit where credit is due.
09-20-2014, 06:30 AM
Actually had several Belfry fans stop and shake hands and congratulate Pikeville fans. Classy bunch. Absolutely hope they go on to have a great rest of the season.
09-20-2014, 06:30 AM
oneijoe Wrote:The DANGER of this kind of thinking and can sabotage the VALUE to be found in a loss is... it's possible it was Henry Clay who was "flat" in its game with the Pirates instead of Belfry "flat" tonight vs. the Panthers. Consider that.You can ask any Belfry fan and they will tell you the same thing. The pursuit that Belfry had in the last 3 weeks was not there tonight. Belfry didn't want it. Pikeville did.
There's NO way to know for sure.
09-20-2014, 06:31 AM
PHSForever Wrote:Pikeville had at least 3 players out that I know of. With depth more at a premium than it is a Belfry, the injured player excuse is played out. Keep chewing, the crow don't taste better, but it gets easier to swallow.
I got no crow. I'm a born and bred Johnson Central fan. I used to argue with people back in the OLD days (like 2000) about JC vs Pikeville on the OLD BG Preps. (Good memories. I got banned more than once.) But I know Belfry will be fine. I suspect Pikeville will be too. While it's definitely an exultable result, I doubt the Belfry heart was carved out and eaten.
09-20-2014, 06:32 AM
skully03 Wrote:You can ask any Belfry fan and they will tell you the same thing. The pursuit that Belfry had in the last 3 weeks was not there tonight. Belfry didn't want it. Pikeville did.
LOL. Pikeville wouldn't let them have it.
09-20-2014, 06:32 AM
jetpilot Wrote:I almost never buy the "flat" excuse. What he is trying to say is Pikeville kept punching Belfry in the face and Belfry for some unknown reason didn't feel like punching back tonight? Very lame and almost all of the Belfry posters have given credit where credit is due.I'm not trying to be lame. As a dedicated fan you just notice certain things watching game after game about your home team. I too have given nothing but props to Pikeville. I hope they go all the way to BG.
09-20-2014, 06:33 AM
PHSForever Wrote:There was no push because the focus was containment. A big push would open the end runs. The LBs slow on the reads means they were holding their gaps. Football 101 against Belfrys offense. Pikeville had the speed to slow down and make the right reads, then speed up and gang tackle. Don't insult the boys by trying to pass it off as Belfry having no fire or hunger. All I've read from posters like 1991#8 is how Belfry looks forward to "beating us bad" and so forth. For a solid week it has been like that. Now it's "oh, no fire, no hunger. Wail! We've seen this and talked about it for a while now". Just hush and enjoy the crow compliments of the county champs this year. Need a little more salt to make it palatable? Read below:
BREAKING NEWS:
The judge has rescinded his earlier decision allowing the child to be placed at Pikeville. Turns out, they like to "take switch to the behinds". Officials are now debating possibly placing the child with their red headed step-brother, Pike Central because they are not capable of beating anyone from Belfry.
:ChairHit:
Football 101...huh? Where's that been the last 13 years??? Enjoy your win. But there's nothing I posted that's not accurate.
09-20-2014, 06:39 AM
OutlawJoseyWales Wrote:Not really sure what "psychobabble" your referring too......
What I posted was fair...and spot on in terms of objectively looking at this game and how Belfry played.
BTW.....I don't think I made any "predictions" about this game....
Wasn't intending this personally to you (about the predictions, that is), but the "we had no fire" and "no leadership", and especially casting doubt on their ability to "regroup and gain lost focus" statements are awfully heavy (and hardly "objective", it was your opinion only) to lay on a team -only because- they came out on the low end of a game score.
Not going to pursue this any more. It just irks me when a team is accused of all kinds of shortcomings just because they played someone better on a given night.
hh:
09-20-2014, 06:39 AM
Kudos to the panthers!!! Biggest win probably in the last 10 years for that program.... It's always nice to beat your in county rivals especially when it's belfry
09-20-2014, 06:40 AM
OutlawJoseyWales Wrote:Football 101...huh? Where's that been the last 13 years??? Enjoy your win. But there's nothing I posted that's not accurate.Lol. Had to respect Sani's (and others) ability to throw at least some previously. Couldn't load the box. What were the passing stats for Belfry tonight? It's a whole different game when one aspect of the O doesn't threaten or make you have to game plan for it. Pikeville had the DB's to cover WR's one on one, so they were able to stack the box. Plus the DB's were able to peek into the backfield and assist on run stopping. While you may have been technically "accurate" regarding slow reactions, etc, there was a REASON for it. Some people "objectively" analyze, and fool themselves into believing it.
09-20-2014, 06:41 AM
One thing that hasn't been mentioned on here is the Pikeville crowd tonight. Fanstastic. Huge crowd, very loud and into the game. Student section was awesome as always. Band, cheerleaders and dance team did a great job as they always to. Pikeville definitely won the battle of the crowds which is awesome considering it is Pond Creek Nation.
09-20-2014, 06:42 AM
oneijoe Wrote:Wasn't intending this personally to you (about the predictions, that is), but the "we had no fire" and "no leadership", and especially casting doubt on their ability to "regroup and gain lost focus" statements are awfully heavy (and hardly "objective", it was your opinion only) to lay on a team -only because- they came out on the low end of a game score.
Not going to pursue this any more. It just irks me when a team is accused of all kinds of shortcomings just because they played someone better on a given night.
hh:
This.
09-20-2014, 06:44 AM
skully03 Wrote:You can ask any Belfry fan and they will tell you the same thing. The pursuit that Belfry had in the last 3 weeks was not there tonight. Belfry didn't want it. Pikeville did.
Or it's as EKU said in the preview thread - Pikeville does a very good job of bottling pursuit and I think someone DID admit that Belfry has been blocked in the past.
09-20-2014, 06:45 AM
mikehancho25 Wrote:Love it, I hope jet is living it up. Congrats panthers.
haha Mike you know it. Good win for the Dawgs too.
09-20-2014, 06:46 AM
jetpilot Wrote:One thing that hasn't been mentioned on here is the Pikeville crowd tonight. Fanstastic. Huge crowd, very loud and into the game. Student section was awesome as always. Band, cheerleaders and dance team did a great job as they always to. Pikeville definitely won the battle of the crowds which is awesome considering it is Pond Creek Nation.Most electric crowd in a LONG time. Last time I saw anything close to this was when they broke out the black unis
09-20-2014, 06:48 AM
oneijoe Wrote:Or it's as EKU said in the preview thread - Pikeville does a very good job of bottling pursuit and I think someone DID admit that Belfry has been blocked in the past.But it was just one time and required a beautiful job of blocking. :lmao:
09-20-2014, 06:49 AM
oneijoe Wrote:Wasn't intending this personally to you (about the predictions, that is), but the "we had no fire" and "no leadership", and especially casting doubt on their ability to "regroup and gain lost focus" statements are awfully heavy (and hardly "objective", it was your opinion only) to lay on a team -only because- they came out on the low end of a game score.
Not going to pursue this any more. It just irks me when a team is accused of all kinds of shortcomings just because they played someone better on a given night.
hh:
Well sometimes you have to strip down the bed sheets to get rid of the bugs........
09-20-2014, 06:49 AM
Big congrats to Pikeville! It's been way too long.
Good to see that this rivalry is back.
Good to see that this rivalry is back.
09-20-2014, 06:50 AM
PHSForever Wrote:Most electric crowd in a LONG time. Last time I saw anything close to this was when they broke out the black unis
Hey now... the BLACK unis belong about 26 miles down US 23 from you !!
:dontthink nicker:
09-20-2014, 06:51 AM
PHSForever Wrote:But it was just one time and required a beautiful job of blocking. :lmao:
And everyone was flat and cramping.:biggrin:
09-20-2014, 06:51 AM
skully03 Wrote:You can ask any Belfry fan and they will tell you the same thing. The pursuit that Belfry had in the last 3 weeks was not there tonight. Belfry didn't want it. Pikeville did.
Does this mean Haywood has lost the passion and unable to motivate his team? on the hot seat? nicker::trolldad:
09-20-2014, 06:53 AM
pjdoug Wrote:Does this mean Haywood has lost the passion and unable to motivate his team? on the hot seat? nicker::trolldad:Unless HAYWOOD was in pads and playing D, then No.
09-20-2014, 06:53 AM
PHSForever Wrote:But it was just one time and required a beautiful job of blocking. :lmao:
I had said that Belfry could only be blocked if it was done beautifully,and only once per game. I was wrong and admit it. Pikeville blocked beautifully on several occasions nicker:
Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)