[Hoot Gibson]

This thread reads like it was written by someone who was let out of a rubber room and let out of their straightjacket just long enough to write it and then immediately was put back in their straightjacket and put back in their rubber room. Then some liar made up a fake thread title that has nothing to do with what the crazy person wrote. Somebody tell the deranged author and the fake thread title writer that another woman (E. Stefanik) is a huge favorite to replace Liz Cheney.

She is just going to be a pawn.  She has already shown that she will kiss the ring and do as she is told.  We need more strong leaders, such as Cheney and Romney, who are not afraid to go against the grain to try and do what's right.  It's obvious that does not work in Washington at this time, and it may never again.  

Nixon would have never been brought to justice in today's world and Howard Baker and others would have been shamed from the Party for doing the right thing.

So name the Democrats who are strong leaders who are not afraid to go against the grain and do what's right. None, thanks for playing.
Your idiotic sexism lie gets blown out of the water and you come back with an even more idiotic pawn lie. Due to extreme brainwashing, you guys have literally zero critical thinking skills.

Claire McCaskill, Chrissy Houlahan, Donnelly, Manchin. 

Most politicians are more concerned with the needs of the Party as opposed to the needs of the people.  Although I will have to admit that the needs of the Party run a distant second to getting themselves reelected.

Disagreeing with one's party position does not make a politician a strong leader. John McCain was and Lindsey Graham is a great example of this fact. Strong leaders persuade others to support their principled positions. Neither Cheney, Romney, nor any of the Democrats that you listed are what I would consider strong leaders.