[mr.fundamental]

Lol boys, it is going to plan. Lets look up at the top of the thread. So far, so good.

Hoot; President Obama appoints a judge. Judge does not get hearing.
During an election President Trump appoints judge, judge gets hearing, during an election.
Now logically Hoot says Constitution grants that right to the current president.
However, logically the constitution does not apply in the first case because party affiliation is different. Exactly where was that in the constitution?

Point is boys, there is nothing you can ever say without being a pure hypocrite other than, my party is in charge and that is the way it is.

Now just remember that has a consequence as well. Anyway have a great week.