[PC_You_Know]

Head to head I would say that UK and Duke got about an even draw. BUT the teams that their respective opponents had to beat causes more or less rest and pushes the team further. UK had a weak WF team but NO WAY is it close to a struggling pac 10 school to play in the second round. Either game was not even close so it is not an issue. Purdue with their 2nd leading scorer missing caught up with them and they struggled against the Blue Devils where as Cornell was an up-start club with energy but I will say it was a wash. Now in the regional final Baylor was a hard draw but they where now where close to as good of a team as WVU even without Bryant. UK played the potential 4th number one seed in as their 2 seed and Duke got to play (arguably the 2rd best 3 seed) Baylor. I know that you will disagree but I will not make a statement that Duke had a hard run to the final four.

This is the problem most people have with die hard UK fans. You are claiming that your team is dead even with the national champion, yet your team couldn't get out of the Elite 8. WOW!

That struggling Pac-10 team knocked off Louisville who almost beat your Wildcats.

WVU didn't have their PG and they kicked UK's butt.