[Scotty doesn't know]

[quote=Scotty doesn't know]They split in the reg season. WVU was on the rise at the end of the season hence the reason that they were a stronger seed worthy of the last 1. Villanova was on a little bit of a slide down so it was a shock for them to get a strong two seed.[/Q#1 UOTE]

WV was worth of a #1 seed, i agree 100%! however it should have been syracuse or someone not duke! Duke has played great all season! They have beaten the teams they had to play! Its not there faught that UNC was down this year (that the execuse you use for UK's weak schedule) I think the seeding was right! I think that duke had the 2nd toughest bracket of the 4!

SOrry man. I have to disagree. When you give a team the opening round winner and the worst 2 and 4 seeds that qualifies as a weak field. Duke did what they needed to and they should be congradulated on winning and beating who was placed in front of them. But you can not convince me that Duke had the second hardest bracket.. Come on now.