[tradition]

I have no opinion on the Dunn case, but it is more interesting how these cases continually seem to go in different directions on what appear to be similar facts. Sometimes it appears that celebrity programs and athletes get more leniency and sometimes, like with Dunn and Boyle, it seems the KHSAA bends over backwards not to appear to show favor to the more successful programs that are being closely watched.

Regardless of the outcome in this case, I think most everyone can point to a very similar case where the decision went the opposite direction...just wish you could explain why or predict future decisions. Maybe unpredictable is the way it is supposed to be?

Would you like to explain which cases you are comparing this case to? Might help my feeble mind understand what you are trying to say.