[thecavemaster]

I have only been a member since last fall, but since I have joined I have not seen anybody equate Obama to Mao or Hitler. I have seen people falsely accused of doing so, and I myself was recently falsely accused of being a racist.

Millions have identified themselves as fascists but there was only one Hitler. Pointing out the fascist nature of Obama's bailout of GM and Chrysler, including the firing of GM's CEO, and the unconstitutional actions of the "Pay Czar" is not the same as calling Obama "Hitler." Nor is pointing out the socialist aspects of Obamacare the equivalent of labeling him "Mao."

I truly believe that Obama's goal is to move this nation's government to the far left, so I will continue to call him a socialist when the shoe fits. Most radical leftists like Obama never become blood thirsty mass murderers, but it is best to throw radical leftists out of office while we can do so through the ballot box, just to be on the safe side. To paraphrase Barney Fife, we must nip socialism, communism, and fascism in the bud.

November offers an opportunity to send Obama a rebuke of his socialist agenda the likes of which this nation has never seen. How he reacts to the message will determine whether he is remembered simply as a mediocre president or a miserable failure. His first year's performance has already put "average," "good," and "outstanding" permanently beyond his reach.

Question: was the sending of troops into the South to enforce equality in education via integration a violation of State's rights? NOTE: I am not setting a trap to call you a racist. I am wondering how far you take the state's rights thing. If a State lacks the will to recognize and accept essential liberties, has the Federal Government no recourse? Aren't we United States citizens above and beyond all?