[Aslan]

Look, Knott should never have let Perry back into the game in the first place, it is their fault they lost. They got a RARE second chance and that was taken from them. Knott got lucky with that last shot and the win would have been theirs. Without that call KCC would have won. Regardless of the fact that KCC beat themselves, they would have won. Second chances like that are rare, but I think the call against Davis was wrong. But like I said, Knott beat themselves by giving PCC the opportunity.

So to simplify that:

Do I think that KCC lost entirely bc of the refs?
No, they should have won by 8 or 10 pts.

Do I think they lost on the second chance bc of the refs?
Yes

When we go to Hindman we will see this. Where there is unbiased, or less unbiased officiating.

No, Knott didn't "let" Perry back in the game. Perry was never out of the game. They was down 2-8 points most the game, they was NEVER out of it. Perrys played better teams than Knott and not got beat by more than 5, so now Knott can beat them by double digits at Perry? Cmon, theres no logic in that.
Once again, would of, could of, should of, Knott didn't and Perry did.
And Knott didn't beat themselves, Perry beat them. Also, Knott will get calls at Knott, it's only natural the home team gets a few calls, but it won't decide the game.