[Hoot Gibson]

Uh, two can be a duality... not to quibble over your little illiteracies. "Overwhelming majority"? I think not.

I would ask you to provide a link to support your assertions but the absence of such links in your previous posts suggest that you may lack the ability to comply to such a request.

Duality is to multiplicity as triangle is to polygon. (The preceding sentence contains two analogies - just let me know if I need to post the definition of an analogy.)

[INDENT]From The Free Dictionary (note the bold definition below)
multiplicity [ˌmʌltɪˈplɪsɪtɪ]
n pl -ties
1. a large number or great variety
2. the state of being multiple
3. (Physics / General Physics) Physics
a. the number of levels into which the energy of an atom, molecule, or nucleus splits as a result of coupling between orbital angular momentum and spin angular momentum
b. the number of elementary particles in a multiplet

mul·ti·ple (mlt-pl)
adj.
Having, relating to, or consisting of more than one individual, element, part, or other component; manifold.
n.
A number that may be divided by another number with no remainder: 4, 6, and 12 are multiples of 2.
[/INDENT]

Now, if there is a multiplicity of recognized legal scholars who believe that Obama was right when he asserted that the Supreme Court decision will open the floodgates of donations from foreign corporations, you should have no trouble providing the names of at least two of those brilliant legal scholars. If you prefer to cling to your definition of multiplicity, then perhaps you can produce three or more such opinions.

BTW, Obama does not count as a "recognized legal scholar." He has a master's degree and once was a Senior Lecturer - he was never a tenured professor and he never held the title of "Professor," despite his claims to the contrary.