[Stardust]

SC won, not Downey!

He went 9/29 and people think he is amazing, because he made a few lucky shots. Any other night and he's 4 or 5/29.

But, still 9/29 is horrible.

Cousins and Wall had 46 of 62. Patterson had 5, Miller had 0, Bledsoe had 4. Thats why UK lost. Not because Downey was amazing.

What if UK played about as good as they did against Ark. and Downey still puts up these numbers?

Everyone would be saying Downey is selfish and needs to get his teammates involved. But, UK played horrible.

Alright, Downey Was terrible, absolutely horrible, just stunk the place up. You are absolutely right - AND THANK GOD HE WAS BAD!

1. Cats lose by 6

2. Downey was 9/29. Thank god the UK defense was able to hold him to only 9 made baskets, so let's go the other direction. Let's say Downey shoots at a 50% clip on the night instead, that means he makes 15 shots instead of 9, so there is 12 more points at the bare minimum, but I give him at least two more made three pointers, which adds 14 total points to his game and makes him have a pretty good game from the field.

3. Downey's 14 points makes this a 20 point Blowout win for USC, all without their #2 scorer and their #1 rebounder. Thank God USC didn't have any body else that could rebound better than they already did.

4. If Downey has a better shooting night and the Cats are down 20, then they don't pound the ball inside and start firing three-pointers. The rate they were making three-pointers they would have had even fewer points than 62, so now this turns into a 20-25 point win for USC and everybody in the nation laughing at UK and their #1 ranking.

5. Thank God Downey was terrible last night!:yawn: