Thread Rating:
01-22-2010, 04:48 PM
Stardust Wrote:Is it possible that Mason forced Ashland to be less disciplined? Usually a team does not play their game due to what the other team is showing them on defense.
Just giving Ashland a little credit where credit is due. I thought the passing lanes were open, and that doesn't take anything away from Mason. Both games were competitive by anyone's definition. If just one game had been close between them it would be hard to support what I said but, they were both close with the one played at your gym being the closest. Congratulations on the win, I thought the Royals earned it.
Messages In This Thread
Mason Co. 58 - Ashland 54 - by homeless_camel - 01-19-2010, 10:44 PM
Mason Co. 58 - Ashland 54 - by fp_atl - 01-19-2010, 10:45 PM
Mason Co. 58 - Ashland 54 - by Gold Charger - 01-20-2010, 12:10 AM
Mason Co. 58 - Ashland 54 - by Squid - 01-20-2010, 01:30 AM
Mason Co. 58 - Ashland 54 - by homeless_camel - 01-20-2010, 02:42 AM
Mason Co. 58 - Ashland 54 - by Gold Charger - 01-20-2010, 07:08 AM
Mason Co. 58 - Ashland 54 - by Stardust - 01-20-2010, 09:11 AM
Mason Co. 58 - Ashland 54 - by OORAH - 01-20-2010, 09:16 AM
Mason Co. 58 - Ashland 54 - by Squid - 01-20-2010, 09:35 AM
Mason Co. 58 - Ashland 54 - by Captain Backdoor - 01-20-2010, 09:42 AM
Mason Co. 58 - Ashland 54 - by Peacedomes85 - 01-20-2010, 09:54 PM
Mason Co. 58 - Ashland 54 - by back_in_black - 01-21-2010, 12:24 AM
Mason Co. 58 - Ashland 54 - by Gold Charger - 01-21-2010, 07:59 AM
Mason Co. 58 - Ashland 54 - by The Iceboxx - 01-21-2010, 10:50 AM
Mason Co. 58 - Ashland 54 - by gapman - 01-22-2010, 02:05 PM
Mason Co. 58 - Ashland 54 - by Stardust - 01-22-2010, 02:08 PM
Mason Co. 58 - Ashland 54 - by gapman - 01-22-2010, 04:48 PM
Mason Co. 58 - Ashland 54 - by Squid - 01-22-2010, 06:06 PM
Mason Co. 58 - Ashland 54 - by Peacedomes85 - 01-22-2010, 07:54 PM
Mason Co. 58 - Ashland 54 - by Gold Charger - 01-22-2010, 09:58 PM
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)