[Hoot Gibson]

Highlands Defense only allowed a legit 7pts against both teams. Both offenses control the clock well. JC is too weak in the 2nd half to stop an aerial attack from JH. JH doesn't have guys going both ways. JH pulls away with a sustained aerial attack and JC has another year of what could have been's.....

It would be a close game, regardless of how many "illegitimate" points each team scored. John Hardin may play guys one way but it does not have the depth of talent that Highlands does and simply playing a two-platoon system does not ensure a win against a quality team. JC's size and running game would wear down the John Hardin defense.

Just out of curiosity, how many of Highlands' points against JH and JC were "legitimate," in your opinion? For example, were the touchdowns that resulted from Johnson Central's three second half turnovers less legitimate than the ones that the Bluebirds scored in the first half?

Let me guess, all of Johnson Central's turnovers were forced, so all of Highlands' points were legitimate. Only Johnson Central scored points that were not legitimate in your opinion. Am I right? :popcorn: