[thecavemaster]

Because of my frequent use of the very unambiguous phrase "global warming hoax," I assumed that your question was rhetorical...and to think I was worried about overusing that phrase! :HitWall:

Let me be clear, (using a favorite meaningless Obama phrase to focus your attention on my answer), any impact that mankind's production of CO2 on our climate is so small as to be inconsequential. Our species does not have the technology to produce enough CO2 to make any serious impact on the global climate without bankrupting every man, woman, and child on this planet - even if that was our objective.

The global warming hoax is nothing but a vehicle to help deliver socialism to the inhabitants of our world who still enjoy a measure of freedom.

Does that answer the question for you? Just say no to the global warming hoax.

You wouldn't think that a small percentage of organisms within an overall much larger system could kill a host, would you? However, the behavior of a small percentage of cancer cells can do just that. I hope your "negligible human impact" theory is correct.