[Hatz]

You need to read a little closer next time. I did not say Boyle was bush league. I said other places that I had been.
I don't know anything about the filming. Matter of fact, could care less. I know that they put the radio announcers "eventually" in a corner and they couldn't see past the 30 yd line. I asked a question. I didn't try to start an argument.
Bottom line is this, both places should do better than that. If we meet up next year, it will happen again. That's what we're looking at now.

No, you need to construct your sentences a little better next time.

What was the deal with the Boyle fans and officials who were refusing to let Bell's announcers broadcast the game friday night? Noticed the police had to step in to allow them access. I've seen that happen at some bush league facilities before but never thought I would see that at Boyle.

Grammatically speaking it's very clear that your last sentence equates what you have seen at some "bush league" facilities with what "I would see that at Boyle" states. :ChairHit:

You equated the two as equal. That may not be what you meant but that is what you typed.

Bottom line is that Bell gave the shoddy treatment out last year. This year Boyle wanted to but chose not to because of safety and the fact that they did not want to sink that low. Boyle could have made the film crew stand over there and film (unless it has to be agreed upon by the commissioner, board of reveiw and both teams :biggrin.

As to your last part, whether you thought you were starting an argument or not, that is what you did by your inferences and the fact that after posting so boldly in the pregame thread, the first posts you make are critique and criticism with little to no Congrats to the victors. Pretty poor. :dontthink