[Hoot Gibson]

Thank God you guys don't serve!

When you raise your hand and take that oath it means something.

All of it!

Sitting there in your easy chair and making judgments on which parts of the constitution you want to defend and which to disregard isn't very patriotic.

What part of the US Constitution do you think these Navy Seals failed to defend and what part do you believe requires non-uniformed enemy non-combatants be afforded any constitutional rights or civil trial? Throughout most of this nation's history, those fighting this country and captured out of uniform were given a quick military trial and executed - including those captured in this country during wartime. Neither the Taliban nor al Qaeda are parties to the Geneva Conventions, so their "soldiers" are not covered by those documents either.

By criminalizing the war on terror, the Obamao administration is risking setting precedents that could severely restrict our armed forces' ability to defend this nation in the future.

So, please list what constitutional rights the terrorists who captured four US civilians on Iraqi soil and tortured them to death should enjoy, in your opinion.