[CatDawg]

The last line you asked what is the difference I would say that needs to be asked of the families that have suffered since we did go back in. He was contained with the UN regulations and the no fly zones. We waste millions everyday so I don't think it is about money. We have troops keeping areas contained all over this world. Why split your forces and resources to open another front when you haven't finished the main mission of getting Bin Laden. I would still like to know why Iraq was more dangerous than North Korea. North Korea is further along with nuclear capabilities, they continue to do missle test, they've shipped arms against UN regulations, while Iraq was contained, UN inspectors on the ground, No fly zones, The President was in power by name only. If Iraq was a deserved target then we should have been hitting North Korea as well. What is the difference between the two that would justify letting them continue to do as they want but not Iraq?