[congressman]

Did you or did you not make an argument that extended to states an almost imperial power? If you do extend to states that extreme unction, doesn't that end up with black students staring at the gate of the University of Mississippi? I am not suggesting you are a racist. I don't know you. I was asking a question about the "end up place" of your philosophy. I'm not sure it's me who's not tracking.

Ok, I see where you decided to go off the deep end. If you honestly believed I meant imperial power for a state, then this is surely a topic beyond what you can comprehend. However, at the risk of doing so in vain, I'll try to explain it as simple as possible....

States have rights protected by the constitution that you mention in every post.

Where the constitution that you mention in every post speaks on federal power, states gave up that right/power.

Where the constitution that you mention in every post doesn't grant federal power, states have power.

I like this. Alot.

I wish the federal government would follow these guidelines today, and in the future.

The nation would be a better place than it is, if they did.

You don't understand this.

Its ok.

I do.

:Thumbs:

CaveMaster, I seriously don't understand you or your reasons for acting as you do. I'm assuming its an act... Eitherway, there's no excuse for intentionally twisting simple ideas into complexities far beyond the original intent. As I said, its partly my fault for not yielding to your learning curve, and for that I'm sorry. In the future, I will take this into consideration and if possible I'll gladly do my part to help you out on this board by breaking it down into a simple, easy to read/easy to understand style of writing. Is it my font? Maybe?

------------

Now back on topic! Anyone have anything to add? Surely there's some ideas about how to improve this document. I'm always looking for new suggestions on how to do so, because this nation currently needs all it can get. :Thumbs: