Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rush: "The replacement for coal doesn't exist."
#41
Old School Wrote:Hey, I not against nuclear power, in fact I think nuclear power is a must if we want to become engery independent. I just don't think 10 years is a reasonable time table to replace 40% of their electricity, I think a 20-25 year timetable is more reasonable.

As I've said many times before as a nation we need to be engery indepentent and to do this we will need energy from all sources including wind, solar, coal, gas, oil , nuclear and whatever else we can think of.
Again, a statement I totally agree with.:Thumbs:
Messages In This Thread
Rush: "The replacement for coal doesn't exist." - by TheRealVille - 07-22-2009, 08:57 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)